Back to @Erik_Seidel's profile

Erik Seidel engagement report

@Erik_Seidel - 90K followers on X

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.118%
of 90K followers
Per impression
0.912%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
12.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
106
interactions (median)
Saved
0.009%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.17/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Wednesday

Early reading. We have captured 3 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 106 interactions against 90K followers, an engagement rate of 0.118%. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.912% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.17 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 40K interactions, about 380x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.118%, Erik Seidel sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.5%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.5%
p902.09%
p99119.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,536 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,995 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.5%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link33% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 33% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 129 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 8, 2026380x their median

    Today is World Donkey Day. https://t.co/qFqrZkTOol

    30K6.1K1.7K3.0K3.3M viewsView on X
  • Mar 10, 202628x their median

    Doris Kearns Goodwin and Jon Meacham join Ari and Ben to debate which historic figures deserve to be on the Mount Rushmore of U.S. Non-Presidents. Legacies examined. Impact measured. History debated. But only 4 will be etched in Rushmore history. HOW'D WE DO? https://t.co/zHaVEA4mLN

    2.4K238272274.1M viewsView on X
  • Nov 27, 201623x their median

    Overheard on subway: "Hey, that guys a poker player" "No he's not" "He is" "Oh, well that's why he's riding the subway"

    2.1K2507220View on X
  • Jun 29, 20258.9x their median

    No vote, just stick @TheGrinder44 straight into HOF

    87345262102K viewsView on X
  • Jul 11, 20258.2x their median

    I get lots of positive feedback at WSOP for things I haven’t done, books I haven’t written, podcasts I haven’t been on. It feels good

    7871462263K viewsView on X
  • Jan 6, 20265.9x their median

    I spoke with poker legend @Erik_Seidel about the negative impact of leaving the tax deduction for gambling losses at 90%. Despite what some of my colleagues like @SenatorLankford believe, inaction will have serious, concrete consequences on the gaming industry and economy across the country including Oklahoma which has over 140 tribal casinos. It will also force gamers to pay taxes on income they never earned which is just unfair. If we don't get this fixed, many gamers will face a difficult choice of whether they can afford to play or not. #FAIRBETAct

    4928343681K viewsView on X
  • Jun 12, 20265.4x their median

    Just want to say I really respect how Soverel handled that last night. Also respect to @WSOP for posting the clip. Most operators get shook at the mere mention of cheating and sweep it under the rug, thought it showed integrity to not hide the incident and share it. The single biggest threat to the game we love, nice to see it being taken seriously

    5286323131K viewsView on X
  • Jun 13, 20264.6x their median

    Not enough talk about @ikepoker for HOF. Crushed the biggest games online, live & 65m in tournament cashes. He should be a 1st ballot shoo in

    4062064174K viewsView on X
  • Dec 8, 20254.3x their median

    Very concerned about the tax change next year. It’ll put me in semi-retirement. Open to any opportunities, especially if it involves traveling to new spots. DM here or on IG

    362206710181K viewsView on X
  • Apr 21, 20263.4x their median

    Anyone who thinks the new tax law will result in more revenue for the govt is completely delusional https://t.co/4SHirWEvEe

    29339226104K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 106 interactions against 90K followers, an engagement rate of 0.118%. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.912% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.17 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 40K interactions, about 380x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Erik Seidel's engagement rate on X?
Erik Seidel (@Erik_Seidel) has an engagement rate of 0.118%, based on the median interactions across 3 original posts from the last 30 days against 90,015 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.118%, Erik Seidel sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Erik_Seidel have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @Erik_Seidel post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going