Back to @ErikSolheim's profile

Erik Solheim engagement report

@ErikSolheim - 357K followers on X

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.075%
of 357K followers
Per impression
1.97%
13K views on a typical post
Reach
3.78%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
266
interactions (median)
Saved
0.104%
14 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.3/day
active 83% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 266 interactions against 357K followers, an engagement rate of 0.075%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 1.97% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 26% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 60x its own typical post.

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026. Recurring tag: #netzero2070.

Compared with accounts its own size

Erik Solheim's engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 67% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.075%, Erik Solheim sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,258 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,968 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link26% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 26% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 723 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 9, 202660x their median

    This is a view of India 🇮🇳 you could hardly have imagined ten years ago ! I have been traveling extensively in India and its is amazing to see how infrastructure is improving by the day: * Trains are much more reliable and comfortable. Next year first high speed line will open. * Airports are modern and new airports are coming up by the day - in Mumbai, greater Delhi and more. * 25 Indian cities are constructing metros. * Roads are drastically improving - both highways and may be most importantly the last mile connection to the hundreds of thousands of villages. There is an old saying that if you want to get rich you should start by building a road. The infrastructure revolution in India is a marvelous step towards Viksit Bharat - the modern India. Well done India! Thanks @IAjitDoval_IND

    13K2.6K284119566K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 202618x their median

    Everyone knows China is the world leader on green technologies. But not everyone is aware China is also the lead tree planter and the source of best practice for greening of deserts. https://t.co/3S8soHjV5L

    3.5K87021371203K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202612x their median

    When most of the world was sleeping China became the global leader in electric vehicles: https://t.co/3sbe6IVL6O

    2.3K64411785273K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 202610x their median

    Sometimes the anti-China bias in Western media turns hilarious. The Economist believes China should apologize to the world for making the best and cheapest green products - solar panels, wind mills, batteries and electric cars. Why dont we in West show our Chinese friends the way?? We Norwegians will start with a big, big appology for our huge overcapacity in salmon. We produce a lot more salmon than we can realistically eat, staying in good health. Such a bad show of Norwegian might makes right! By the way we have overcapacity in cod and oil also - so may be a triple appology from Norway would be appropriate? The US can follow suit and tell the world how much they regret being home to Apple, Google and Microsoft? The US should also stop producing soy beans and wheat at low price? Italy and France also have a lot to regret. Why do they provide fashion products we all admire? Such regrettable overcapacity in ladies bags! And even worse in wine. It’s time to get started, folks! Its time for apologies!

    2.1K4431282587K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20264.7x their median

    Solar will become the dominate source of energy this century - as fossils were in the last. One third of the world’s total solar capacity was installed in the last 19 months. The first terawatt took decades to build – the latest one took just over a year and a half. China is the global leader, but India has moved to the second spot. The number of countries with at least 1 gigawatt of solar has risen from 42 in 2020 to 74 now. The underlying direction remains clear: Annual solar additions are moving towards 1 terrawatt while deployment continues to spread across all continents.

    862278912830K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20264.0x their median

    Denmark 🇩🇰 shows the way - from 15 to 90% renewables since 2000. In 2000 renewables generated 15% of Denmark’s electricity. Today they provide over 90%. Denmark shows how quickly an electricity system can change when policy, markets and infrastructure move in the same direction. Here is why: * Denmark scaled wind steadily and consistently. Deployment was not driven by short-lived booms; capacity expanded year after year, allowing industry capability and public acceptance. * Interconnection is vital. Denmark is tightly linked to neighbouring European grids, allowing surplus wind to be exported and flexibility to be imported when needed. Denmark is a reminder of something important in energy debates: Its about political leadership and the buy in from business, the technolgy is available in abundance. Every country is different, but we can do worse than learning from Denmark.

    687272922624K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20263.4x their median

    Brilliant program to turn pine leaves into biochar in Indian 🇮🇳Himalayas. Pine leaves and needles are a major hazard in Himachal Pradesh. Dry at the forest floor they create ample conditions for forest fires. Now the Government of Himachal Pradesh and local people are turning the problem into an opportunity ProClime has developed an indigenous Indian technology turning the leaves into biochar, oil and vinegar. Creating jobs, protecting nature and people. Bravo!

    70517413831K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20262.9x their median

    China develops the electro stat, the US the petro state. We all know who is winning. China now generates 45% more electricity than the US and EU combined. When the world is facing the warmest temperatures in modern times and forest fires are devastating in Europe and America and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz puts energy security front and center - China is the future, the US is the past. Fortunately the US historically has shown a remarkable ability to course correct when heading the wrong way. I am confident we will see the US bouncing back China and the US use electricity very differently. The US consumes most of its electricity in the residential and commercial sectors, while China uses much more for industry. China's industrial electricity use is now higher than the US even on a per-person basis. Electricity output is a fairly good proxy for industrial capacity. This put China ahead in the race for leadership in AI, advanced manufacturing, robotics and everything that depends on access to abundant electricity.

    514179671530K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20262.8x their median

    If you wish to seek wisdom - go to Nalanda in India 🇮🇳! For hundreds of years Nalanda University in Bihar was the intellectual center of the world. This weekend I visited both the old Nalanda and the brand new University opened by Prime Minister Modi, showcasing modern India. In the 630s the Chinese monk Xuanzang embarked upon a trip to Nalanda. He left Xian, by far the biggest city in the world at the time with a milion or more people. The journey to India took 17 years. It was an incredible dangerous travel - wars, criminals, diseases, natural catastrophes. Bu he left for one reason we should all emulate today - he wanted to find the truth. He was a seeker. He believed the ultimate wisdom was to be found in India, at Nalanda. Today a lot of what we know about Nalanda is thanks to his writings after returning to China. He claimed there were 10 000 students and 2 000 monks and scholars at Nalanda. It may have been up to 9 million books. After returning Xuanzang was offered the highest positions in the state by the emperor but said no thanks. He wanted to spend the rest of his life translating the Indian Buddhist wisdom into Chinese. In a world which sometimes rejects wisdom and where some leaders prefer stupidity to common sense - we can do much worse than to follow the example of Xuanzang and look for wisdom and truth.

    583122191036K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.5x their median

    I am so happy to see the great vindication of The Art of Living and Gurudev Sri Sri Ravi Shankar. In a a remarkable ruling The Indian 🇮🇳 Supreme Court this week set aside the anccusations against The Art of Living for alleged environment damage during World Culture festival in 2016. It clarified what many of us always knew - that no environmental damage was done. After a decade-long fight, truth has triumphed. It has taken ten years - no less. I still recall visiting India during the World Cultural Festival 2016. There was an unprecedented media frenzy on the Yamuna River event attacking it morning, midday, evening. The Supreme Court ruling should act as a severe warning against such one sided media onslaughts. The World Culture Festival 2016 was a historic celebration of India’s cultural heritage and soft power, bringing together 3.5 million people from 155 countries, including world leaders, heads of state, 37,000 artists and 2,500 spiritual leaders. It was inaugurated by Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi. It was unprecedented in size. My warmest congratulations to Gurudev Sri Sri and the entire Art of Living family! This is a day of huge relief. It inspires to future good work for india and the world.

    4592095313K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#netzero2070

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 266 interactions against 357K followers, an engagement rate of 0.075%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 1.97% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 26% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 60x its own typical post.

What is Erik Solheim's engagement rate on X?
Erik Solheim (@ErikSolheim) has an engagement rate of 0.075%, based on the median interactions across 39 original posts from the last 30 days against 356,706 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.075%, Erik Solheim sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ErikSolheim have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ErikSolheim post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going