Back to @Eomzo1's profile

Elite Eomzo engagement report

@Eomzo1 - 469K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.236%
of 469K followers
Per impression
2.78%
39K views on a typical post
Reach
8.49%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.028%
11 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.33/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 469K followers, an engagement rate of 0.236%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 39K times each, and 2.78% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 10x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Elite Eomzo's engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 76% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.236%, Elite Eomzo sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,349 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.696%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.696%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,349 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,452 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.696%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video88% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 39 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 24, 202610x their median

    On Thursday evening, more than a dozen teams received either warnings or disqualifications from a recent event. As a result, some teams were disqualified from the heats, others from evaluation Cup, and some received only warnings. Several participants were using an earlier version of a tool developed by JoshuaSlugger (creator of droppingcalc), specifically the auto bus importer. A newer version 1.4 has recently begun rolling out as of 2days ago , which includes more advanced features such as storm tracking, teammate materials, and in-game bus angle calculations. Most of the disqualifications were related to the auto bus calculator 1.0 which was released 3 weeks ago which is part of the same software used for 1.4 which i didn't use. If the ban reason is exploiting, then how is it fair to exclude some players from grands when others did the exact same thing? In a situation like this, it should be either everyone or no one—anything else is inconsistent and unfair. As you can see in the first video this is what the 1.0 does. we were told that it was white listed application meaning epic allowed it to be used and Josh told us that epic approved him for the auto bus importer prior to us downloading this Josh's words "its a white listed application that's been around for 5+ years and the company is like 15 years old if it wasn't allowed epic wouldn't have approved being able to get the bus path a month ago". We were under the assumption that it was allowed by epic. Aussie clip for context: https://t.co/vU4KJ3xcva 5 teams that currently got disqualified from heats and grands Ozone Golden. Rise Curly. Eomzo Josh. Vergo Shadow. S1ned,G13ras have received a different punishment compared to Other pros. Many other pros also used this program and received warning and notification but were never removed of heats leaderboard. Bugha Kraze Veno Curve Vico Malibuca Acorn Boltz Juufn Kantri and more who haven't spoken up or are afraid I reached out to Hogman to clarify if something like the 1.4 version was allowed and never got a answer. i only ever used the 1.0 version which only has the Auto import bus. We would never knowingly or intentionally try to cheat or exploit this game. For years, we’ve followed the guidelines and upheld the integrity of competition. This game means everything to us, and being disqualified from one of the biggest events of all time is truly heart breaking. For many of us, this isn’t just a hobby—it’s our full-time career. Some of us have even moved countries, leaving behind family and friends, to compete at the highest level. We care deeply about this community and the standards it represents, and we’re committed to continuing to compete fairly and honestly. GRAND FINALS IS TOMMOROW PLEASE MAKE THIS RIGHT @FortniteStatus @FNCompetitive @Fortnite

    9.5K832622861.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20265.1x their median

    https://t.co/7gARbu4Zjs

    5.3K1971009146K viewsView on X
  • Apr 30, 20264.8x their median

    Back where i belong 🇩🇪 @Joshreyli https://t.co/FxqipKxHLw

    5.0K1181183106K viewsView on X
  • May 30, 20263.3x their median

    Finals @Joshreyli https://t.co/ToEBXeapVH

    3.4K62843155K viewsView on X
  • Apr 20, 20263.3x their median

    Grands @Joshreyli @tezsi7 https://t.co/qo3DFwvL56

    3.4K891157391K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 20263.2x their median

    grands 11/12😱 @Fredoxie_ https://t.co/WWeB0xTiIS

    3.4K35756202K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20262.9x their median

    20🎈

    2.7K43346165K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20262.7x their median

    qualed Belgium $14k @Joshreyli @tezsi7 https://t.co/nFaXqk4W93

    2.8K4986174K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20262.6x their median

    Faxuty 10k win how is NAW still a region

    2.8K23190112K viewsView on X
  • Jun 6, 20262.6x their median

    major 2 @Joshreyli @tezsi7 https://t.co/iWjF39t32z

    2.8K5226095K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 469K followers, an engagement rate of 0.236%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 39K times each, and 2.78% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 10x its own typical post.

What is Elite Eomzo's engagement rate on X?
Elite Eomzo (@Eomzo1) has an engagement rate of 0.236%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 469,197 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.236%, Elite Eomzo sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,349 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Eomzo1 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Eomzo1 post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going