Back to @EmreErgenekon's profile

Pops Emre-Bonsu 🔥 engagement report

@EmreErgenekon - 386K followers on X

Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.854%
of 386K followers
Per impression
12.2%
27K views on a typical post
Reach
6.98%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3.3K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.041%
11 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.67/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 3.3K interactions against 386K followers, an engagement rate of 0.854%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 12.2% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.00% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 46K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Pops Emre-Bonsu 🔥's engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 99% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.854%, Pops Emre-Bonsu 🔥 sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.677% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video98% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 98% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 102 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 18, 202514x their median

    Şu mükemmelliğe bak… https://t.co/xnkxzzUqHL

    43K2.4K2943974K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20267.0x their median

    Madem öyle, işte böyle… https://t.co/YgIUFjMdoH

    22K663409901.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20264.7x their median

    Sen neymişsin kral be, biz seni yanlış bilmişiz kusura bakma… https://t.co/zObioYWxvE

    15K26010411277K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20263.1x their median

    Spiker 1 dakika içinde; “Fenerbahçe ait olduğu yerde Şampiyonlar Liginde” demesi üzerine ardından “18 yıllık hasret sona erdi.” diye bitirdi. Daha komik çok az şey duydum. 😁

    9.6K3851398154K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20263.0x their median

    Dipçik gibi.. 🤩 https://t.co/7XICbnFdgf

    9.9K13633072K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20263.0x their median

    Manası çok derin.. 👌 https://t.co/NwwNlLDMdm

    9.5K3655811124K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.7x their median

    Attığı gol sadece Başakşehir kalesine girmedi.. Attı iptal ettiler, daha iyisini attı. 👏👏 https://t.co/cZfp53XcOu

    8.5K31217552K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20262.5x their median

    Baba bu fizik şaka mı? https://t.co/FlaKmEZZOv

    8.1K105465266K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.2x their median

    Madem öyle, işte böyle.. 🤨 https://t.co/ttixOWR2b9

    6.8K13313326213K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20261.9x their median

    Sana hakem diyenin amk, maçın başında net kırmızıyı vermedin, rakibe penaltı hediye ettin. https://t.co/xM15Lv00wq

    5.6K3182461864K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3.3K interactions against 386K followers, an engagement rate of 0.854%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 12.2% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.00% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 46K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

What is Pops Emre-Bonsu 🔥's engagement rate on X?
Pops Emre-Bonsu 🔥 (@EmreErgenekon) has an engagement rate of 0.854%, based on the median interactions across 45 original posts from the last 30 days against 386,188 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.854%, Pops Emre-Bonsu 🔥 sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @EmreErgenekon have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @EmreErgenekon post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going