Back to @EliseStefanik's profile

Elise Stefanik engagement report

@EliseStefanik - 1.1M followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.018%
of 1.1M followers
Per impression
0.705%
27K views on a typical post
Reach
2.51%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
187
interactions (median)
Saved
0.007%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.6/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 187 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.018%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 43% of 3,917 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 0.705% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.6 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 236K interactions, about 1260x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #flight93, #ny21.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #flight93, #ny21.

Compared with accounts its own size

Elise Stefanik's engagement rate beats 43% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,917 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 42% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.018%, Elise Stefanik sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,996 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99154.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,996 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 96,714 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile154.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%54K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%56K
04:00 UTC-6%45K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%82K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%99K
14:00 UTC-3%102K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%103K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%89K
19:00 UTC-2%84K
20:00 UTC-1%78K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%54K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%239K
Monday0%303K
Tuesday-3%305K
Wednesday-1%259K
Thursday-2%251K
Friday-3%260K
Saturday+3%234K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 23, 20261260x their median

    If you have a second home in New York City worth more than $5M, check your mailbox when you’re back in the five boroughs — because you've got mail. Today, we sent notification letters to property owners, letting them know that our new pied-à-terre tax is coming soon. The best city in the world deserves the best parks, libraries, and schools in the world. That's only possible when we all pay our fair share.

    195K14K22K3.8K20M viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 2026121x their median

    BREAKING 🚨 Mayor Zohran Mamdani responds to The Italian American Civil Rights League. We WON! But we know exactly who Zohran is, what he stands for, and we’ve only just begun this fight. https://t.co/tiI4o3My7l

    18K2.2K2.0K3192.3M viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 202641x their median

    BREAKING: Newly declassified records reveal Special Counsel Jack Smith’s team unlawfully (in violation of Constitution) accessed text messages to and from the following current and former Senators and House members: 1. Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) 2. Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) 3. Senator John Cornyn (R-Texas) 4. Senator Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) 5. Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) 6. Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah) 7. Senator Cory Booker (D-N.J.) 8. Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.) 9. Senator Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska) 10. Senator David Perdue (R-Ga.) 11. Senator Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) 12. Senator Martha McSally (R-Ariz.) 13. Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) 14. Senator Rick Scott (R-Fla.) 15. Senator Rob Portman (R-Ohio) 16. Senator Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) 17. Senator Susan Collins (R-Maine) 18. Senator Tim Scott (R-S.C.) 19. Senator Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) 20. Senator Cory Gardner (R-Colo.) 21. Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) 22. Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.) 23. Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) 24. Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) 25. Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.) 26. Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.) 27. Rep. Mark Walker (R-N.C.) 28. Rep. Bryan Steil (R-Wis.) 29. Rep. Dan Newhouse (R-Wash.) 30. Rep. Doug Collins (R-Ga.) 31. Rep. Dusty Johnson (R-S.D.) 32. Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) 33. Rep. John Katko (R-N.Y.) 34. Rep. Joshua Gottheimer (D-N.J.) 35. Rep. Karen Bass (D-Calif.) 36. Rep. Ken Buck (R-Colo.) 37. Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-N.Y.) 38. Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-Fla.) 39. Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) 40. Rep. Morgan Griffith (R-Va.) 41. Rep. Rodney Davis (R-Ill.) 42. Rep. Russ Fulcher (R-Idaho) 43. Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.) 44. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.)

    5.0K2.1K421194522K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 202638x their median

    The @CivilRights Division is probing if Harvard’s China-based student aid program—which seems to be reserved for foreign students—is national origin discrimination against US citizens. Not one dime of financial aid at any federally-funded college should exclude American students! https://t.co/6cBbYJSGNS

    5.3K1.5K19238213K viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 202614x their median

    🚨🚨FULL STATEMENT on Jack Smith’s Illegal Weaponization Spying on Congress and Subsequent Perjury 🚨🚨 “The American people have long known that Joe Biden’s hand-picked prosecutor weaponized government at the highest levels, and I have long suspected that he unconstitutionally spied on Members of Congress — including me — and then perjured himself in front of Congress. The newly declassified records confirm exactly that. Special Counsel Jack Smith’s team unlawfully and unconstitutionally accessed my private text messages, along with 43 other Members of Congress, in clear violation of the Constitution. As President Trump has said, the illegal weaponization and abuse of power was not just against the President, it was against all his supporters who spoke out against it, and now we see it extended to duly elected Members of Congress. This is not an isolated incident. It is the latest and most egregious example of the most widespread and dangerous weaponization of the federal government in our nation's history that I have spent years fighting to expose. As a leading voice in Congress on the House Intelligence Committee and the Select Committee on Weaponization, I have worked to investigate and expose the Biden Administration’s collusion with Big Tech to censor Americans, the FBI’s illegal targeting of parents at school boards and traditional Catholics, the Russia collusion hoax, lawfare against President Trump and his allies, and the broader pattern of the deep state illegally targeting political opponents. These bombshell records confirm that unaccountable special counsels and federal agencies used their power to secretly and unconstitutionally surveil elected representatives without proper legal process. Accessing the private communications of lawmakers is an assault on the separation of powers, Congressional independence, and the Constitutional rights of every American. There must be criminal consequences for this egregious, unconstitutional, and illegal abuse of power targeting duly elected Members of Congress and the American people. Those responsible must be held fully accountable, and we must enact strong reforms to prevent any future administration from weaponizing government tools against the American people or their elected representatives. The American people sent us to Washington to defend the Constitution, not to allow it to be shredded by politically motivated prosecutors. I will continue leading the fight against this weaponization and abuse of power until real accountability and lasting reforms are achieved."

    1.8K4962282283K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 202611x their median

    🚨🚨HOT off the press! 🚨🚨 Today’s @NYPostOpinion @nypost https://t.co/OIEltGfwJn

    1.6K39358225K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 202611x their median

    BREAKING: Suspect apprehended after incendiary device deployed outside 26 Federal Plaza in NYC, FBI reports https://t.co/7sZxyan0XV

    1.5K32017842235K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 202611x their median

    EXCLUSIVE: The top official in the Zohran Mamdani administration’s Office for International Affairs made plans to meet with Iran’s ambassador to the UN. Commissioner Ana María Archila was scheduled to meet with Amir-Saeid Iravani in an official capacity. The meeting was called off after the State Department—which was not informed of the meeting ahead of time—met with the Mamdani administration to clarify acceptable conduct. https://t.co/dVPtr7abQL

    1.4K300152113775K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20268.9x their median

    .@KarolineLeavitt did a phenomenal job making history serving as President Trump’s White House @PressSec. America will miss her at the podium but I know that there are fantastic chapters ahead for her and her family. So proud of Karoline and proud to call her a friend. The best is yet to come! ❤️

    1.5K10541336K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 20268.6x their median

    $7.8M $20.9M $9.78M Millions from Chinese military-linked entities have flowed to U.S. universities. Past admins let reporting of counterparties slide, but no longer. As of today, entities posing real national security risks are fully visible on https://t.co/Xk7q6xlByi.

    1.1K429561868K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#flight93#ny21

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 187 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.018%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 43% of 3,917 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 0.705% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.6 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 236K interactions, about 1260x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #flight93, #ny21.

What is Elise Stefanik's engagement rate on X?
Elise Stefanik (@EliseStefanik) has an engagement rate of 0.018%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,058,694 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.018%, Elise Stefanik sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,996 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @EliseStefanik have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 43% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,917 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @EliseStefanik post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going