Back to @Eiichi_Kimura's profile

木村英一 engagement report

@Eiichi_Kimura - 157K followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.003%
of 157K followers
Per impression
0.303%
1.3K views on a typical post
Reach
0.84%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.37/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 157K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 8% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.3K times each, and 0.303% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.84% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31 interactions, about 7.8x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #成長組織の作り方, #リーダー育成, #規律.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026. Recurring tags: #成長組織の作り方, #リーダー育成, #規律.

Compared with accounts its own size

木村英一's engagement rate beats 8% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 16% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, 木村英一 sits below the 10th percentile of the 213,381 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.699%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,381 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,403 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.699%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 164 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 12, 20267.8x their median

    「君の、今の最重要領域は何?」 明日、部下の誰か一人に 抜き打ちで聞いてみてください。 即答できたら、運用は本物。 考え込んだら、それは その社員の問題ではなく 会社の宿題です。 Podcast 第 14 回 約 16 分。 https://t.co/XV2fUBCSpX #成長組織の作り方 #最重要領域

    301004.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20267.5x their median

    【新エピソード公開】 理念も、行動指針も、 壁には貼ってある。 それでも現場が動かないのは 「意識」ではなく「運用」の問題。 決めるのはリーダー。 証拠は立ち話の即答。 姿勢は「やる」か「もっとやる」か。 ▼ 聴く (約 16 分) https://t.co/r10MiZuZ4w #成長組織の作り方 #最重要領域

    281103.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20266.3x their median

    同期入社、共に優秀だった50代の二人。 Kさんは新システムを拒み、 今は「最近の若い奴は」が口癖。 M常務は年下に操作を教わり、 今は経営幹部。 差は能力ではありません。 自分の“象”を御せたかどうか。 Podcast 第 15 回 約 16 分。 https://t.co/qCtzf2eUSY #成長組織の作り方 #人材育成 #マックのチョコミントフラッペ帰ってきた

    250003.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20266.3x their median

    【新エピソード公開】 「昔はこのやり方でうまくいった」 「俺の経験ではこれが正解だ」 その言葉は、脳内の“象”への餌。 象は太り、理性の言うことを 聞かなくなる。 育つかどうかは才能ではなく 「階段」の問題です。 ▼ 聴く (約 16 分) https://t.co/m2liYkUZwi #成長組織の作り方 #人材育成 #マックのチョコミントフラッペ帰ってきた

    250001.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20264.0x their median

    本日 8/12(水) 10:30、 Podcast「成長組織の作り方」 第 14 回 配信。 『掲げるだけでは、機能しない』 ── 理念も目標も、壁には貼ってある。 それでも動かないのは 「意識」でなく「運用」の問題。 ▼ 記事で先読み https://t.co/gqeb8eh3bX #成長組織の作り方 #最重要領域

    150102.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20263.5x their median

    Podcast「成長組織の作り方」 第 18 回、配信中。 挨拶。報告。整理整頓。 言えば、その週はやる。 翌月には、元通り。 ── 「言えばやる。でも、元に戻る」。 これを何年も、繰り返していませんか。 ▼ 記事で読む https://t.co/znAXxlDVxQ #成長組織の作り方 #人材育成

    121102.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20263.0x their median

    【新エピソード公開】 日本の教育水準が高いのは、 遺伝子でも根性でもなく、 全国統一の「カリキュラム」があるから。 誰が教えても成果が出る 「構造による育成」の証明です。 御社に、社員のカリキュラムはありますか。 ▼ 聴く (約 9 分) https://t.co/KE7Mk85vPA #成長組織の作り方 #人材育成

    120002.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20262.8x their median

    【新エピソード公開】 「昔はこのやり方でうまくいった」 「俺の経験ではこれが正解だ」 その言葉は、脳内の“象”への餌。 象は太り、理性の言うことを 聞かなくなる。 育つかどうかは才能ではなく 「階段」の問題です。 ▼ 聴く (約 16 分) https://t.co/sNmXqLoe9O #成長組織の作り方 #人材育成

    110001.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20262.5x their median

    社長の言葉をそのまま流すのは 「伝書鳩」 チームの言葉に訳すのが 「翻訳機」 今日のワンアクション: 方針を一つ「そのために」で 二段降ろし、役職者に渡す。 「君のチームの言葉に 訳してくれ」と。 Podcast 第 13 回 約 14 分。 https://t.co/HymikKZh3T #成長組織の作り方 #最重要領域

    100003.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20262.3x their median

    「自分でやったほうが早い」。 鍛えるのは処理能力ではなく「自分の円を意図的に縮める力」。 落ちそうなボールを一つだけあえて拾わない。 ✕ 貸してごらん、私がやるから ◯ あえて任せて失敗させる Podcast 第 21 回 約 13 分。 https://t.co/LX3elFZL7A #成長組織の作り方 #リーダー育成

    90002.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#成長組織の作り方#リーダー育成#規律

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 157K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 8% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.3K times each, and 0.303% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.84% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31 interactions, about 7.8x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #成長組織の作り方, #リーダー育成, #規律.

What is 木村英一's engagement rate on X?
木村英一 (@Eiichi_Kimura) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 157,467 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, 木村英一 sits below the 10th percentile of the 213,381 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Eiichi_Kimura have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 8% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Eiichi_Kimura post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going