Back to @Ei_Nerd's profile

Ei Nerd engagement report

@Ei_Nerd - 437K followers on X

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.208%
of 437K followers
Per impression
6.38%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
3.27%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
912
interactions (median)
Saved
0.126%
18 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.3/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 912 interactions against 437K followers, an engagement rate of 0.208%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 6.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 9% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 135K interactions, about 148x its own typical post.

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Ei Nerd's engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 94% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.208%, Ei Nerd sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 81 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 28, 2026148x their median

    Bro realizing he’s just a regular dude😭😭 https://t.co/zGCKgwqYoI

    129K5.4K23630921M viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202616x their median

    É difícil demais pro Tom Holland kkkkkkk https://t.co/CuFnNlpZoj

    14K40772110K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202612x their median

    Nada nos vazamentos chegou perto disso aqui: https://t.co/t0anEfoBD5

    11K3326232262K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20267.8x their median

    Não foi fácil pro Tom Holland kkkkk https://t.co/6eA9bZAvxx

    7.0K1269368K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20264.9x their median

    COM QUAL IDADE VOCÊ DESCOBRIU QUE ELES NÃO SÃO O MESMO PERSONAGEM? https://t.co/lDx1BcUEL0

    4.2K1351022487K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20261.5x their median

    Tome https://t.co/uA8ZmY4rKK

    1.3K5512420K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 2026

    Essa cena deletada de Todo Mundo em Pânico 3 KKKKKKKKKKKK https://t.co/1nr4TOZRGM

    1.2K291015K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 2026

    Admito que estou com saudades de The Boys. https://t.co/qmOGQpghwG

    1.1K207021K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 2026

    INSANO DEMAIS!! GTA 6 TÁ ABSURDO! https://t.co/luaZJA1JUF

    1.0K196113K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 2026

    E O DIA EM QUE O HOMEM-ARANHA APARECEU NO FILME DOS X-MEN DA FOX? https://t.co/c7gPb4AXjo

    967182217K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 912 interactions against 437K followers, an engagement rate of 0.208%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 6.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 9% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 135K interactions, about 148x its own typical post.

What is Ei Nerd's engagement rate on X?
Ei Nerd (@Ei_Nerd) has an engagement rate of 0.208%, based on the median interactions across 22 original posts from the last 30 days against 436,531 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.208%, Ei Nerd sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Ei_Nerd have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Ei_Nerd post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going