Back to @EiProfeta's profile

El Profeta engagement report

@EiProfeta - 542K followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
1.46%
of 542K followers
Per impression
4.86%
162K views on a typical post
Reach
29.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
7.9K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.124%
202 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.37/day
active 83% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 7.9K interactions against 542K followers, an engagement rate of 1.46%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 98% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 162K times each, and 4.86% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 30.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 25% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 78K interactions, about 9.9x its own typical post.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

El Profeta's engagement rate beats 98% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 89% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.46%, El Profeta sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 152 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 13, 20269.9x their median

    Harry Potter y el misterio de por qué pusieron a James y Lily Potter en las películas como si tuvieran 52 años cuando ambos murieron con solo 21 años. https://t.co/01g36x7tAf

    75K3.1K3702062.7M viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20266.3x their median

    Los actores que interpretan a Fred y George en la serie Harry Potter están recibiendo críticas por no ser idénticos. Madre mía cuando descubran que James y Oliver Phelps no eran gemelos y se conocieron durante las audiciones. https://t.co/viwpbqMGIL

    48K1.5K1141132.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20265.8x their median

    El crossover más grande de la historia sería que los hermanos Pevensie de Narnia fueran los 4 fundadores de las casas de Hogwarts. https://t.co/yCTpvaZo6B

    43K2.5K863503.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20265.5x their median

    Se viene la época de frío y lluvia. Automáticamente yo: https://t.co/SkvW1A6NZm

    37K6.3K451501.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20264.9x their median

    El logo de Warner Bros a medida que avanza la saga Harry Potter. https://t.co/Is9KrTuuJ2

    37K1.3K210255K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20263.9x their median

    8 días para el 1 de Septiembre y aún no he recibido la carta de Hogwarts. https://t.co/gJ9bhq3VtE

    27K3.4K46228459K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20263.6x their median

    “¿Qué planes tienes para Navidad?” Yo: https://t.co/xpMAj7jUIS

    24K4.7K37187294K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20263.5x their median

    Stuart Little es, según informes, el principal candidato para interpretar a Scabbers en la próxima serie de televisión de Harry Potter de HBO. https://t.co/9Gf7DwEmAi

    26K1.7K83158478K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20263.3x their median

    No hay nada más épico que un sangre pura y una sangre sucia se besen delante de la estatua del mismísimo Salazar Slytherin. https://t.co/ywPv4697OT

    24K1.4K3583428K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20263.2x their median

    Como ocurre cada 1 de septiembre, se puede ver esto en la estación de King's Cross. Simplemente maravilloso. https://t.co/fq6wFmjhgK

    23K2.4K43178769K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 7.9K interactions against 542K followers, an engagement rate of 1.46%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 98% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 162K times each, and 4.86% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 30.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 25% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 78K interactions, about 9.9x its own typical post.

What is El Profeta's engagement rate on X?
El Profeta (@EiProfeta) has an engagement rate of 1.46%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 541,763 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.46%, El Profeta sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @EiProfeta have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 98% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @EiProfeta post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going