Eerik N Kross 🇪🇪🇺🇦🇮🇱🇪🇺 engagement report
@EerikNKross - 79K followers on X
Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 249 interactions against 79K followers, an engagement rate of 0.316%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 2.40% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 27% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 69x its own typical post.
Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Eerik N Kross 🇪🇪🇺🇦🇮🇱🇪🇺's engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 65% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.316%, Eerik N Kross 🇪🇪🇺🇦🇮🇱🇪🇺 sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 82% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 27% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 82% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 27% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 468 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Feb 15, 202569x their median
80 years ago 17 East European nations were sold out to communist tyranny so that the West could enjoy peace and liberal democracy. 30 years ago Eastern Europe won back its freedom despite efforts of our friends to “keep stability”. 1/6
- Sep 5, 202630x their median
Did the Chinese just intentionally humiliate Russia or was Beijing simply rational. Either way, asking Kyiv for assurances that Vladivostok would not be struck during a high-level Chinese visit is pure gold. https://t.co/m0a4polSM9
- Aug 17, 20268.9x their median
Ruské kamery v silničních radarech na Slovensku obsahovaly nezdokumentovaný modul, který je umožnil na dálku ovládat a získat k nim plný přístup i přes mobilní síť. K aktivaci stačilo poslat SMS z jednoho z 12 ruských čísel. https://t.co/rXXjj2ftCo
- Sep 17, 20267.2x their median
This is pure gold. What to make of Russia pretending to protect conservative values—and how to counter its aggression. The brilliant Avi Sahar at the European Parliament on why words like “hybrid,” “resilience,” and “below threshold” just hide our cowardice. https://t.co/FPcqsg2ZVp
- Aug 31, 20264.7x their median
A former president of Iceland, a NATO member, who championed the No campaign in Iceland’s EU referendum has come out in praise of a Russian document criticising NATO. Nothing to see here. https://t.co/VHXCwIt2w9
- Aug 25, 20263.4x their median
To everyone worried about the CIA director’s “secret” trip to Moscow: it is as public as it gets. He is flying from Riga to Moscow and back. That alone is part of the message: "we know what you are planning, don't" https://t.co/epK8uGmohL
- Aug 22, 20263.4x their median
🚨 NEW: The Kremlin has withdrawn it's ambassador to London - and said the UK should "reconsider it's policies" towards Russia 🚨 Andrey Kelin, who served as the Russian ambassador to the UK for over seven years, left his diplomatic posting on July 21 without any official statement or announcement. Moscow has not submitted any candidates to the Foreign Office to replace him and embassy staff are understood to have no indication of when a successor might be appointed. There are concerns the lack of a replacement has effectively downgraded diplomatic relations between the two countries, prompting fears of a complete breakdown in communication between Moscow and London. The news comes after The Sunday Times reported British drones had been used by Ukraine to attack targets on the Russian mainland, prompting the embassy in London to threaten unspecified “consequences”. Full article below 👇
- Sep 22, 20262.6x their median
A reality check on the current “war with Russia is about to start” frenzy. Russia is aggressive. It is waging a major war in Ukraine, conducting sabotage and other terror operations in Europe and yes, is testing NATO's red lines Russia probably wants us to believe so - but there is no new intelligence assessment saying Russia is about to attack NATO. There is quite a difference between THREAT and IMMINENT WAR. We should be able to understand both at the same time. So where did the current panic come from? European politicians and media created a perfect storm, (likely with the help of Russian assets) making deliberately strong statements, often for domestic political reasons. Russian intimidation and hybrid warfare is designed to frighten, divide and pacify Europe. Media/sm logic turns “NATO has plans for every contingency” into “NATO expects war any day now.” The NATO Military Committee chairman said the Alliance has 4,000 pages of plans covering everything from minor incidents to Article 5. That means NATO is doing its job. Not that war starts Tuesday. Governments need parliamentary support for defence, Ukraine aid and larger EU/NATO budgets. Russia is a real threat, so politicians are not inventing the danger. But there is an obvious temptation to use the most dramatic formulations available. Everyone exaggerates. Then Moscow adds more provocations and threats to the mix. And headlines strip away qualifications. Then algorithms reward the most frightening interpretation. Within minutes preparedness becomes prediction. Estonia’s intelligence assessment remains the same: Russia is dangerous and its military capabilities may grow, but we don't see that Russia intends to attack Estonia or another NATO country in the coming months. Believe me - we are watching very closely, literally. And we will not keep it to ourselves if we see something. We prepare. All of Europe needs to stop panicking and continue doing the same, seriously and calmly. And increase serious military aid to Ukraine. This is what the fight is about today. To make us wobble. Don't. Russia wants us uncertain, divided and sacred. Deterrence requires the opposite: strong defence, clear eyes and steady nerves. The one who stays calm wins the fight.
- Sep 30, 20262.0x their median
🇪🇪🇺🇦The Estonian Parliament has explicitly made Ukraine’s victory and Russia’s strategic defeat the objective. Today’s statement calls for air defence as the first military priority, predictable long-term support, stronger sanctions, Ukraine’s NATO membership and completion of the Special Tribunal. In a speech I argued we should go further: European NATO states should shoot down Russian missiles and drones threatening their territory already over Ukraine, with Ukraine’s consent. Start with western Ukraine. Protect Ukrainian cities and Europe’s borders at the same time. We have spent too long asking what Russia might do if we act. It is time to ask what Russia will do if we don’t. Ukraine must win. Europe must help make that happen.
- Sep 2, 20261.7x their median
The next President of Estonia is Ülle Madise, a constitutional lawyer, long time Human Rights ombudsman and marathon runner. Excellent choice! https://t.co/fQTccrqYov
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 249 interactions against 79K followers, an engagement rate of 0.316%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 2.40% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 27% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 69x its own typical post.
- What is Eerik N Kross 🇪🇪🇺🇦🇮🇱🇪🇺's engagement rate on X?
- Eerik N Kross 🇪🇪🇺🇦🇮🇱🇪🇺 (@EerikNKross) has an engagement rate of 0.316%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 78,911 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.316%, Eerik N Kross 🇪🇪🇺🇦🇮🇱🇪🇺 sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @EerikNKross have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @EerikNKross post?
- Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.53 posts per day across the measured window.