Back to @EdKrassen's profile

Ed Krassenstein engagement report

@EdKrassen - 1.1M followers on X

Measured over 200 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.182%
of 1.1M followers
Per impression
4.56%
44K views on a typical post
Reach
4.00%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.0K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.092%
40 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
10.13/day
active 100% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 2.0K interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.182%. Measured over 200 original posts, its engagement rate beats 80% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 44K times each, and 4.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.00% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 10.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 200 posts sampled, 78% carry an image or video and 16% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 129K interactions, about 64x its own typical post.

Measured over 200 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tag: #potus.

Compared with accounts its own size

Ed Krassenstein's engagement rate beats 80% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 88% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.182%, Ed Krassenstein sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video78% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link16% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 78% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 16% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 195 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 26, 202664x their median

    The disgraced former mayor of New York, Rudy (I was just tucking in my shirt) Giuliani, has threatened to sue me for defamation over an interview in which I never said his name. No one even mentioned him. I want to apologize to Rudy. Going forward I will be certain to say his name directly. Rudy, you worked with known Russian agents and their proxies to spread lies about me and my father. Their names are Andrii Derkach, Konstantin Kulyk, Andriy Telizhenko and Oleksandr Dubinsky and more. Kulyk handed you a dossier filled with disinformation. You flew to Kyiv in December 2019 to sit down with Derkach, then went on television with him to sell his bullshit tapes. Trump’s own national security adviser warned the White House that what you brought back was Russian disinformation. You kept going. Then Trump’s own Treasury Secretary, Steven Mnuchin, sanctioned Derkach in September 2020 as an active Russian agent for over a decade, for spreading the same lies you are still spitting. Four months later, on his way out the door, Mnuchin sanctioned the rest of your sources. Kulyk. Telizhenko. Dubinsky. Eleven people and four media front companies in all. Not sanctioned by me. Not by my father. By Donald Trump’s Treasury Department. And remember Vienna Rudy. In October 2019 you, Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman had tickets to fly there to collect a hard drive, courtesy of Dmytro Firtash, an indicted oligarch who has spent a decade in Vienna fighting extradition to the United States. Lev and Igor were arrested at Dulles holding one-way tickets. You canceled yours the next morning. That was way before a computer repairman in Wilmington was ever a twinkle in your eye. So please, @RudyGiuliani. Please, please sue me. Discovery will be a joy for everyone.

    111K14K2.4K6793.7M viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202649x their median

    Hey! Listen! https://t.co/brGDWq89fV

    74K9.7K8.5K6.3K16M viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202626x their median

    Three years apart. Never surrender. https://t.co/SEUlrGsiU4

    41K6.0K3.5K394984K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202624x their median

    If you can still support Republicans after Jack Smith said this, there is something wrong with you. "We found that [Trump] caused that violence, that it was foreseeable to him, and that he sought to exploit it." https://t.co/i1emxWkrnZ

    35K9.3K3.9K223739K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202621x their median

    BREAKING: Mayor Zohran Mamdani just released 170,000+ pages of long-hidden NYC 9/11 records, including the Harding Memo. Additionally he launched a public portal. After 25 years of delays by prior administrations, he delivered the transparency first responders and survivors deserved. This is what accountability looks like.

    34K7.8K752178640K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202620x their median

    This morning, ABC tried to claim the Biden White House didn’t cut off press access for over 400 journalists. The facts say otherwise... https://t.co/lzghqdhfuk

    28K8.3K3.5K3601.4M viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 202618x their median

    Talafreako supported, encouraged and enabled Biden’s decision to flood Texas with illegal alien criminals from 100+ nations who committed one vile atrocity after another. He aided and abetted the cartels — foreign terrorist organizations.

    28K5.3K2.4K182405K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202616x their median

    Barrack Obama is spotted at Martha’s Vineyard. Who else misses this guy? https://t.co/hXK7Vx4GZR

    24K2.2K5.4K3151.7M viewsView on X
  • Oct 23, 202615x their median

    Kushner also failed to disclose himself as an agent of a foreign government, having been paid nearly $2 billion in total by foreign leaders. https://t.co/fyqxxyuYyp

    23K6.7K475379472K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202615x their median

    This is absolutely devastating for Donald Trump. The president of the Cattleman's Association just tore Donald Trump apart. "You don't put America first by putting US Cattle Producers Last." https://t.co/aaTI3L4qBw

    23K6.4K859220481K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#potus

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.0K interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.182%. Measured over 200 original posts, its engagement rate beats 80% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 44K times each, and 4.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.00% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 10.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 200 posts sampled, 78% carry an image or video and 16% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 129K interactions, about 64x its own typical post.

What is Ed Krassenstein's engagement rate on X?
Ed Krassenstein (@EdKrassen) has an engagement rate of 0.182%, based on the median interactions across 200 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,096,570 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.182%, Ed Krassenstein sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @EdKrassen have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 80% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @EdKrassen post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 10.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going