David Rosenberg engagement report
@EconguyRosie - 310K followers on X
Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 120 interactions against 310K followers, an engagement rate of 0.038%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 0.575% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.69% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.6K interactions, about 5.1x its own typical post.
Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
David Rosenberg's engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 29% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.038%, David Rosenberg sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,782 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.679% |
| 90th percentile | 2.56% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 50% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 75% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 75% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 242 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Dec 23, 20255.1x their median
If you think the CPI data was manipulated, so was today’s GDP report. Strip out government, sliding imports and the sharp drawdown in the personal savings rate in support of consumption (in the face of flat personal disposable income growth), and guess what? Real GDP growth was +0.8% SAAR in Q3, nowhere near +4.3%. A fugazi if there ever was one.
- Jan 23, 20261.7x their median
The two items most inversely correlated with risk assets continue to surge – silver breaking above $100/oz today and gold on the precipice of testing $5,000/oz. That this is happening with the major averages hovering near their all-time highs may well go down as the most bizarre circumstance in modern history. The precious metals complex and the stock market cannot both be right and something is going to have to give at some point. Make your choice.
- Jan 24, 202613x their median
Now that Trump has threatened Canada with a 100% tariff, which would drag both countries into an unnecessary recession, the Supreme Court should probably rethink its four-week recess and finally rule on these cockamamie levies. If you think tax refunds and accelerated bonus depreciation allowances are antidotes, buy yourself a calculator and do the math.
- May 28, 202612x their median
After today’s news that new home sales collapsed by -6.2% in April to a three-month low of 622k annualized units, I must observe that it really says something about the state of the U.S. residential real estate market that they are lower now than they were in late 2007, when the unexpected housing-led recession began to take hold.
- Sep 17, 202612x their median
Not once in the post-WWII era, outside of 2022 when the American consumer was swimming in a $2 trillion pool of fiscal stimulus checks, has the Fed managed to avert a recession when they tightened policy into an energy price shock. The 2s/10s curve is only 30 basis points away from inverting. Keep an eye on it. Nobody, including the Warsh-led Fed, believes a recession is even a remote possibility. A big surprise is coming their way. As we saw with the Internet boom in the early 2000s, AI is not bigger than the business cycle.
- Jan 5, 2026
Apparently, we have a reported +4% growth economy on our hands at the same time that the ISM tells us that only 11% of U.S. industries reported any growth at all in December, down from 22% in November, 33% in October, and 39% a year ago. That 11% share of industries in expansion mode, as an aside, is tied for the second-lowest reading since … wait for it … April 2009, when the Great Recession hadn’t even reached its worst point.
- Jan 12, 2026
Former Fed Governor Larry Lindsey was just on CNBC waxing on about soaring GDP growth but never once mentioning that three-quarters of that +4.3% third-quarter print came from a huge savings rate drawdown and a contraction in import volumes. Strip those contributions out, and the economy expanded at the grand annualized pace of +1%. The Atlanta Fed is north of +5% for Q4 because of surging gold exports. Big deal. No mention either of the fact that real organic personal disposable incomes stagnated for the second quarter in a row in Q3. It’s amazing how even the most brilliant macro minds are duped by this Potemkin economy.
- Apr 17, 20267.9x their median
The Fed is saying it has no intention of cutting rates. But it’s not about any inflation concern. It’s because the central bank has already been easing through the back door with its renewed balance sheet expansion – increasing at a 10% annual rate over the past four weeks! This liquidity bulge has added rocket fuel to the end-of-war market euphoria. Never mind Donald Trump – Jay Powell still has your back!
- May 11, 20267.2x their median
It’s tiring having to listen to talk on bubble vision about how great the U.S. economy is, as has been the case this morning. Good grief. Everyone is fixated on the +115k nonfarm payroll gain in April, with nary a comment anywhere on how the Household survey flagged a -226k job plunge after a -64k pullback in March – now riding a three-month losing streak. The most critical aspect to the report was the sub-0.2% uptick in average hourly earnings, which means that in real terms, take-home pay fell -0.4% last month and that followed a -0.6% March contraction and a flat February. If that is classified as a solid economy and well-balanced labor market, let’s redefine the terms.
- Feb 20, 20266.8x their median
Now what happens to the $5 trillion of foreign direct investment pledges into the U.S. that were made this past year to avoid the Trump tariff threat? Isn’t that why the stock market learned to love tariffs?
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 120 interactions against 310K followers, an engagement rate of 0.038%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 0.575% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.69% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.6K interactions, about 5.1x its own typical post.
- What is David Rosenberg's engagement rate on X?
- David Rosenberg (@EconguyRosie) has an engagement rate of 0.038%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 310,295 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.038%, David Rosenberg sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,782 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @EconguyRosie have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @EconguyRosie post?
- Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.3 posts per day across the measured window.