Back to @EclecticMethod's profile

Eclectic Method ♻️ engagement report

@EclecticMethod - 356K followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.01%
of 356K followers
Per impression
1.92%
1.8K views on a typical post
Reach
0.52%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
36
interactions (median)
Saved
0.054%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.13/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 36 interactions against 356K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 34% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.8K times each, and 1.92% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.519% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video and 5% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 311 interactions, about 8.6x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #videoremix, #aliens, #atomic.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026. Recurring tags: #videoremix, #aliens, #atomic.

Compared with accounts its own size

Eclectic Method ♻️'s engagement rate beats 34% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 65% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.01%, Eclectic Method ♻️ sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,782 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.7%
p902.61%
p9982.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,782 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,357 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.7%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video55% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 55% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 104 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 19, 20268.6x their median

    Hi I'm Jonny, 30 years I been a video music creator collaborating with Brian Eno, Public Enemy, Donald Glover, MTV, Adult Swim, Fatboy Slim, Madness, Motown, Sundance, BBC, Casey Neistat, Monty Python, Redbull, Snoop, Apple, Lionsgate. Been on Fallon, Colbert, Norton, CNN.. shwr: https://t.co/9Fo6FjhvtO

    2244042510K viewsView on X
  • May 3, 20234.9x their median

    EVIL A.I. #ArtificialIntelligence https://t.co/BHPkispbfc

    1174119838K viewsView on X
  • May 3, 20234.9x their median

    "Sacred Bionic Choir - Yaao" by @money_alotta and @EclecticMethod https://t.co/Jf4dcKPHJG

    1441813314K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20263.4x their median

    Video DJing in my living room 16 years ago https://t.co/D7GThlwWaR

    9516823.9K viewsView on X
  • May 11, 20263.2x their median

    Dorsal Fin @runwayml https://t.co/Ug4r46FP81

    991010211K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20262.8x their median

    "If that leads to the end times, OK." 🎸🔥 Turned the latest JD Vance quote into an absolute brutal heavy metal remix. Sound on for the breakdown 👇 https://t.co/TplAfWg6SP

    67141644.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20262.7x their median

    Just got a DM from someone who bought a video DJ mixer that was stolen off me asking why the fader doesn't work. It had my sticker still on it so he was asking me

    6932404.1K viewsView on X
  • Jun 26, 20232.4x their median

    SKIT FACE 001 https://t.co/US3outuz1n

    61217313K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20262.5x their median

    From now on I'm only listening to AI music, I'm sick of human music

    7121713.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20262.5x their median

    In 1999 I made the tune "Y2K" with Brian Eno. Back then I was called B.R.K. and the Y2K virus was a few months away. Only ever came out on CD so here it is https://t.co/rtJwoCFAxx

    61131702.6K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#videoremix#aliens#atomic#baseball#beatbox

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 36 interactions against 356K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 34% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.8K times each, and 1.92% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.519% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video and 5% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 311 interactions, about 8.6x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #videoremix, #aliens, #atomic.

What is Eclectic Method ♻️'s engagement rate on X?
Eclectic Method ♻️ (@EclecticMethod) has an engagement rate of 0.01%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 355,571 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.01%, Eclectic Method ♻️ sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,782 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @EclecticMethod have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 34% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @EclecticMethod post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going