Eriks Stendzenieks engagement report
@E_Stendzenieks - 45K followers on X
Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 136 interactions against 45K followers, an engagement rate of 0.303%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.9K times each, and 1.37% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 22.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 48% carry an image or video and 52% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 572 interactions, about 4.2x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #višvanatgeita, #bollywood.
Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #višvanatgeita, #bollywood.
Compared with accounts its own size
Eriks Stendzenieks's engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 4 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 40% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.303%, Eriks Stendzenieks sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.147% to 0.698%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.147% |
| 75th percentile | 0.698% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.8% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 48% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 52% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 48% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 52% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 359 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 27, 20264.2x their median
Tā nu gan ir odziņa uz tortes! 😂 Kas tad te ieperinājies LZA ēkas 13. stāvā, 1301. kabinetā? Noformē dokumentus pastāvīgās un termiņuzturēšanās atļaujas saņemšanai. Vai tas ir all-inclusive serviss - ar iespēju uzreiz ieguldīt €50K piedāvātā uzņēmumā? Avots: Panorāmas sižets https://t.co/CUC4tigu1P
- Oct 25, 20264.0x their median
NRA: "Bērklijas profesors Darvins šokā par to, kā Latvija izrīkojusies ar Divju Višvanatu". Ko raksts nepasaka. #Višvanatgeita Raksts stāsta par "pazīstamu amerikāņu zinātnieku", kurš "daudzu gadu garumā vadīja Garvuda centru prestižajā Bērklijā" un tagad ir "satriekts". Pārbaudāmie fakti: 1. Darvins nav neitrāls novērotājs - viņš ir lietas dalībnieks. 2022. gada maijā Kanans Višvanats viņu iecēla sava Honkongas uzņēmuma Rupus Global padomē (Rupus paša relīze 09.05.2022). Pēc Google saglabātajiem datiem 07.09.2026 Zoar Limited - Višvanata uzņēmuma, kura dēļ VID pārbauda Kalviņu un Rivžu - vietnē bija "Advisory Board" lapa ar Darvinu, Kalviņu, Rivžu un Lindi; tās atpublicētas pēc VID paziņojuma. Darvins ir līdzautors Kanana grāmatai "Smart Villages" (2022) un galvenais runātājs institūta forumos Rīgā. NRA to nepiemin ne ar vārdu. 2. "Profesors" un "zinātnieks". Darvins bija Garwood centra izpilddirektors (2009–2025), ne mācībspēks; Haas lapā - emeritus. Iegūta zinātniskā grāda nav, ir divi goda doktorāti (viens no CapStone University Pasadena). Scopus: tiaki 4 dokumenti, h-indekss tikai 3. Tagad - UC Santa Cruz Extension. 3. "Izraudzīta dalībai Inovāciju pētnieku programmā, ņemot vērā kompetenci". Garwood "Innovation Fellow" ir izpildvadītāju statuss bez publicētas atlases, bez publicētas maksas, ko piešķir centra vadītājs - tas pats Darvins. Haas oficiālajā viesu zinātnieku sarakstā šo cilvēku vārdā nav. Tajā pašā programmā 2022–23 bija Kanans - to LZA 2022. gadā pārvērta par "UC Berkeley profesoru emeritus". 4. Divjas ieraksts Berkeley lapā ("Lead Data Scientist at the Institute of Economics of the LZA") ir gandrīz vārds vārdā pārkopēts darba sludinājums "Data Scientist, Specialist" - tajā palikusi frāze "the company’s analytics community". Tas pats modelis kā publikācijām: svešs teksts, nomainīts vārds. Kanana ierakstā foto saite ved uz cita cilvēka LinkedIn profilu. 5. "Programma sniedz iespējas publicēt pētījumu rezultātus." Divjas "publikācijas" ir maksas Indijas žurnālos, izgatavotas 17.-19.10.2026 - PĒC Saeimas balsojuma - pārrakstot Kanana bijušā direktora rakstus. Ar Bērkliju tām nav sakara. 6. "Diskreditācijas kampaņa". Raksts nepiemin nevienu dokumentēto faktu: Kalviņa vēstules reģistrācijas numuru, Rivžas neparakstīto vēstuli, publikāciju laika zīmogus, Divjas darba vietu Lindes institūtā, Kanana vietu tā paša institūta padomē kopš 2024. Tā vietā - Bērklijas Nobela laureātu skaits. 7. "Pati to nenojaušot". Divja ir Kanana sieva, kopš 2024 Dr.Vishys "MI laboratorijas vadītāja" - uzņēmumā ar nulles ieņēmumiem, -434K € pašu kapitālu un 1,16 milj. € saistībām. "Vēlējusies investēt naudu" Kalviņa vēstulē ir solījums. 8. "Brutāli piesmējusi". Saeima atcēla likumu pirms tā spēkā stāšanās. Nekas neliedz iesniegt jaunu iesniegumu - ar diplomu un īstām publikācijām. Beigās raksts pārvērš faktu lietu par LZA intrigu pret Kalviņu. Bet VID pārbaudi, prezidenta vēstuli un Saeimas likuma atcelšanu neizraisīja intrigas - tos izraisīja dokumenti, kurus raksts nepiemin.
- Oct 22, 20263.2x their median
Esmu nepatīkami pārsteigts, ka gaišreģi, kuri praktizē LZA ēkā, nespēja šo jezgu savlaicīgi paredzēt, bet lāsta noņēmēji - novērst :(
- Oct 27, 20263.0x their median
Kur visi ReBaltica @jemberga un Progresīvo partijas valdes protesti, ka šādas ziņas nekādā gadījumā nedrīkst publicēt??? Upuris, pusaudze, tak to nelūdza! Viņu mazā pilsētā tagad visi identificēs. Kad vajadzēja atbalsīt Progresīvo politiķi, kurš seksuāli izmantoja pusaudzi, tad tak te sarakstīja pilnu internetu. https://t.co/lHecbpqPy7
- Oct 25, 20263.0x their median
Šis gan ir KAUT KAS… visu cieņu cilvēkiem un mākslīgajiem intelektiem, kas roku rokā šo ir radījuši. (Lai saite darbotos, izņemiet atstarpi pirms ws.) https://lzagate.ct. ws/
- Oct 25, 20262.3x their median
Kāds ir papētījis B. Rivžas akadēmisko rakstu kolekciju? Tā ātrumā pārskatot, rodas pamatoti jautājumi. Piemēram, 2 publikācijas ir gandrīz identiskas: https://t.co/we3SS2Gp21 un https://t.co/I9GvkIDqX7 78,6 % no Agronomy Research raksta vārdiem (4559 vārdi) burtiski atrodami JESI rakstā. Saskaņā ar Publikāciju ētikas komitejas (COPE) terminoloģiju šis gadījums atbilst dubultai publikācijai (redundant/duplicate publication), proti, kad vienu un to pašu pētījumu ar būtībā vieniem datiem, tekstu un secinājumiem autori publicē divreiz, otrajā publikācijā skaidri un redzami neatsaucoties uz pirmo (https://t.co/8GOPAfZ33W) @ilmarmors @ancetetere @2_teikumi @AtminaLV
- Oct 20, 20261.9x their median
Turpinot @ancetetere iesākto, paskatījos tikai vienai publikācijai "puncītī". Publikācijas datums - 2018. gads. Atsaucēs ir minētas 2019., 2021. un 2024. gada publikācijas. Tas ir dīvaini, vai kāds ir spējis lasīt citu pētnieku domas, vai arī... falsifikācija?? @Lato_Lapsa https://t.co/7UYUCAAyH1
- Oct 22, 20261.8x their median
"Tviteris ir miris!" / Inga Spriņģe/ Kaut kas līdzīgs Nīčem bija gadījies ar to Dievu... https://t.co/8lpDIDFmT2
- Oct 22, 20261.6x their median
"Šo Indijas pilsoni Latvijā vispār nevarētu saukt par zinātnieci. Par ko viņa varētu saukties? Par viltvārdi!" Latvijas Universitātes Medicīnas un dzīvības zinātņu fakultātes dekāns Kristaps Jaudzems asi kritizē pamatojumu Saeimas sākotnējam lēmumam piešķirt Latvijas pilsonību Indijas pilsonei Divjai Višvanatai. Skaties raidījumu "Kāpēc": https://t.co/wWR2uLQhhn
- Oct 25, 2026
Es visiem iesaku izlasīt, ko raksta Pakistāna un ko raksta Latvija!!! No LV puses sarunas tik nevainīgas. Par ko tika runāts?? @Arlietas Mobilitāte tika apspriesta??? https://t.co/Ijmplm3hru
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 136 interactions against 45K followers, an engagement rate of 0.303%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.9K times each, and 1.37% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 22.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 48% carry an image or video and 52% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 572 interactions, about 4.2x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #višvanatgeita, #bollywood.
- What is Eriks Stendzenieks's engagement rate on X?
- Eriks Stendzenieks (@E_Stendzenieks) has an engagement rate of 0.303%, based on the median interactions across 27 original posts from the last 30 days against 44,854 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.303%, Eriks Stendzenieks sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @E_Stendzenieks have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @E_Stendzenieks post?
- Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.8 posts per day across the measured window.