Back to @EYakoby's profile

Eyal Yakoby engagement report

@EYakoby - 306K followers on X

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.133%
of 306K followers
Per impression
2.34%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
5.66%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
404
interactions (median)
Saved
0.052%
9 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.87/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 404 interactions against 306K followers, an engagement rate of 0.133%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 2.34% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.65% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 54x its own typical post.

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Eyal Yakoby's engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 70% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.133%, Eyal Yakoby sits above the 50th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99120.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 65,980 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,142 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile120.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video79% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link15% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 79% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 15% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 256 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 4, 202654x their median

    Some of you called him Goyslob. Others called him Chudley, Uncle Ham, and a dozen other names. Then a whole lot of you embraced him, claimed him, and proudly said “literally me.” Just remember: this is the only place where the Magatard lore is actually canon. And canon matters. The “literally me” folks have some explaining to do. Part II.

    17K2.5K1.4K5171.8M viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202611x their median

    NEW: Court documents reveal the former Muslim police chief of Hamramck, Mich., engaged in a “disturbing pattern of domestic violence" at home but ordered his officers not to write up incident reports because wife-beating shouldn't be handled as a "formal" criminal offense https://t.co/uZ4eHPcyuk

    2.7K1.6K10412960K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20269.7x their median

    I was told that being a genocide or holocaust denier was the worst thing in the world. Now, Washington celebrates genocide deniers, as long as it’s Israel’s genocide.

    3.3K445206751K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20266.2x their median

    BREAKING: Governor DeSantis has announced that the Muslim brotherhood and CAIR have been designated as terrorist organizations in Florida. https://t.co/vr3zAnTYLF

    2.2K269461623K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20264.1x their median

    BREAKING: About an hour ago, Hamas terrorists attacked families in Khan Younis, Gaza, opening fire on civilians and injuring several people. https://t.co/dniRt2hNC0

    1.1K4026087154K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20263.1x their median

    Palestinian journalist Rula Jebreal calls Hakeem Jeffries an 'AIPAC monkey' - claims she didn't mean it in a 'racist way' https://t.co/kedxaGxetz https://t.co/b4iPMvaU2n

    9131631334449K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20262.6x their median

    Israel First: Why do you care so much about Israel? Also, Israel First: We got politicians we bribed to pass a law attacking First Amendment on behalf of Israel today! Now, if people want to boycott US, no problem. But if they want to boycott Israel, we'll take their rights away!

    84112969420K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.5x their median

    Joe Kent drops a massive accusation about Section 219. He says Israel could gain unprecedented access to sensitive U.S. defense technology. Will Chamberlain immediately rejects it. This is where the debate goes off the rails. @joekent16jan19 @RealAlexJones @willchamberlain Watch the MAGA vs America First debate. Link in comments.

    745174100935K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.4x their median

    NYC broke record-keeping rules with Mamdani's secret influencer Signal chat, mayor's top attorney seemingly admits https://t.co/xMTYU6semR https://t.co/1s8cekR2AW

    73218438839K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20262.3x their median

    STATEMENT OF THE AMBASSADOR On the U.S. Treasury Designation of September 4, 2026   Today the United States Department of the Treasury designated a single Türkiye-based financial institution and two of its subsidiaries for their role in moving funds on behalf of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps–Qods Force. We want to place this measure in its proper context, because context is everything, and because the relationship between the United States and the Republic of Türkiye is far larger than any one institution or any one day. Throughout this process, Treasury and its Turkish counterparts have been in direct and continuous contact. The action is what a great power owes to the integrity of the international financial system. Washington’s maximum-pressure campaign against the Iranian regime depends upon closing, one by one, the channels through which Tehran launders the proceeds of its activities. This designation is aimed at the conduct of one entity, not at a nation, not at a banking system, and not at an ally. It is enforcement, precise and lawful, and the United States makes no apology for protecting the architecture on which honest commerce everywhere depends. It would be a serious error, here or in Ankara, to read this narrow measure as a judgment upon Türkiye. It is nothing of the kind. Türkiye’s own interest lies in a banking system that is clean, trusted, and beyond the reach of those who would abuse it, and no nation has a greater stake than Türkiye itself in ensuring that its institutions are not turned to purposes their own government would never sanction. The health of the Turkish financial system is not in question; the conduct of one institution was. For that reason we note with respect that Türkiye has moved as a sovereign partner should. Rather than treat an uncomfortable disclosure as an affront, the Turkish authorities have engaged to clarify the ambiguities surrounding this matter and to inaugurate a process that will strengthen transparency going forward. That is not the reflex of a state with something to conceal; it is the conduct of a mature partner determined that its own house be, and be seen to be, in order. Cooperation of this kind is worth more to the alliance than any assurance offered under pressure, because it is offered freely. Allies of long standing do not measure their friendship by the absence of difficulty. Between serious partners, friction is not the exception to the relationship but a recurring feature of it, and the test is never whether a difficult matter arises but whether it is met with candor and resolved with dignity. The stability of the region, and the security of the routes and commerce on which both our peoples rely, the United States and Türkiye stand on the same side, as they have through harder trials than this. We are confident, therefore, that this measure will in time be seen not as a strain upon the partnership but as an instance of its strength: an American action taken after great deliberation, a Turkish response to address with timely and proper investigation, and a shared commitment to transparency that leaves both our nations, and the alliance between them, stronger than before. We will continue this work together, in the same spirit of candor and common purpose that has carried the relationship this far.

    5198923282273K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 404 interactions against 306K followers, an engagement rate of 0.133%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 2.34% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.65% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 54x its own typical post.

What is Eyal Yakoby's engagement rate on X?
Eyal Yakoby (@EYakoby) has an engagement rate of 0.133%, based on the median interactions across 33 original posts from the last 30 days against 305,540 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.133%, Eyal Yakoby sits above the 50th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @EYakoby have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @EYakoby post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going