EU Science & Innovation ๐ช๐บ engagement report
@EUScienceInnov - 133K followers on X
Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 27 interactions against 133K followers, an engagement rate of 0.02%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 29% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.4K times each, and 1.95% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.04% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 27% are part of a thread and 68% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.8K interactions, about 105x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ridayseu, #sciencediplomacy, #horizoneu.
Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026. Recurring tags: #ridayseu, #sciencediplomacy, #horizoneu.
Compared with accounts its own size
EU Science & Innovation ๐ช๐บ's engagement rate beats 29% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 61% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.02%, EU Science & Innovation ๐ช๐บ sits above the 10th percentile of the 200,870 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.141% |
| 75th percentile | 0.671% |
| 90th percentile | 2.53% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 68% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 68% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 317 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 28, 2026105x their median
In broad daylight, Russia struck a building of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine in the very heart of Kyiv. Tragically, there are reports of people killed and injured in the attack. There is no bottom to Russiaโs cynicism. A scientific institution full of people in the middle of a working day has become another target of its terror. Russia is deliberately expanding the boundaries of what it believes the world will tolerate. Every attack left without a strong response only encourages the next one. Our partners have the means to change this calculation. Ukraine urgently needs more missile interceptors to protect our cities, tougher sanctions to deprive Russia of resources for its war, and stronger pressure on everyone who helps Moscow sustain its killing machine. Russia must learn that every attack has consequences. The price of attacking Ukrainian civilians must become unbearable for the aggressor. We also call upon @UNESCO โ the Organization dedicated, among other things, to protecting science and the scientific community โ to strip the aggressor state of its voice, voting rights and its eligibility for election to any governing or working bodies.
- Sep 24, 20263.2x their median
๐ข Registrations for the European Research and Innovation Days 2026 are now open! Join us for top conversations on startups and scaleups, AI, investment, scientific freedom, and beyond. ๐ 10โ11 November ๐ Brussels + online Save your spot: https://t.co/uCHkLUV4te #RiDaysEU https://t.co/WFIgJ4xQjX
- Sep 11, 20262.2x their median
How can Europe become the best place to research, innovate and grow? Join the conversation at the European Research and Innovation Days 2026. ๐ 10โ11 November ๐ Brussels + online Save the date - more details coming soon! #RiDaysEU https://t.co/L87m7QSobM
- Sep 16, 20262.0x their median
From an Erasmus encounter to one of the worldโs leading space-tech companies ๐ช๐บ๐ฐ๏ธ Backed by #HorizonEU funding, @iceye_global shows that EU is the home of innovation and what science, talent and entrepreneurship can achieve together. #SOTEU https://t.co/WC6rOPUs9f
- Sep 29, 20261.6x their median
The @HorizonEU Work Programme 2026โ2027 was reinforced to: ๐ถProtect biodiversity ๐ทStrengthen competitiveness & bring products to market A large part of this additional budget is dedicated to 2 new large-scale calls that will allow R&I to have concrete societal & market impact. https://t.co/gMe7Obeomj
- Sep 9, 2026
Two new proposals adopted today aim to create better conditions for innovators so that they can grow & succeed in the EU. - The European Innovation Act - The Proposal for a Council Recommendation on regulatory sandboxes See how weโll make it possible! ๐https://t.co/TS9gqV0arm https://t.co/ROa2uhpoE6
- Sep 14, 2026
Let's help visionary European ideas scaleup in the EU and compete globally. Discover the European Innovation Act with @EZaharievaEU โฌ๏ธ https://t.co/CUKgMcKpBe
- Sep 28, 2026
Congratulations to the winners of #EUCYS 2026 who were announced last Saturday in Kiel ๐ฉ๐ช! We look forward to seeing their ideas shape the future of European science! Discover all the winners๐https://t.co/05wJ3f7HfH https://t.co/EqFK672m6I
- Sep 18, 2026
What can European science achieve with artificial intelligence? Find out at the AI in Science Summit, 15โ16 October, Dublin. Join the discussion on Resource for AI Science in Europe (RAISE) and on our future engine for scientific discovery. ๐ https://t.co/vEUxXdZKBc https://t.co/ijvVrqJG8P
- Sep 24, 2026
๐ข Just a few days left until the Knowledge Exchange Platform seminar โFrom Innovation Act to Regional Imp(Act)โ! Discover the full programme and secure your spot for the KEP seminar before itโs too late: https://t.co/fPS7huLpv3 https://t.co/NRHz6qwsrK
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 27 interactions against 133K followers, an engagement rate of 0.02%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 29% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.4K times each, and 1.95% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.04% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 27% are part of a thread and 68% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.8K interactions, about 105x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ridayseu, #sciencediplomacy, #horizoneu.
- What is EU Science & Innovation ๐ช๐บ's engagement rate on X?
- EU Science & Innovation ๐ช๐บ (@EUScienceInnov) has an engagement rate of 0.02%, based on the median interactions across 22 original posts from the last 30 days against 132,891 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.02%, EU Science & Innovation ๐ช๐บ sits above the 10th percentile of the 200,870 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @EUScienceInnov have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 29% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @EUScienceInnov post?
- Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.93 posts per day across the measured window.