Back to @ESPN_FDJ's profile

Fuera de Juego engagement report

@ESPN_FDJ - 942K followers on X

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.01%
of 942K followers
Per impression
0.583%
16K views on a typical post
Reach
1.66%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
91
interactions (median)
Saved
0.006%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.83/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 91 interactions against 942K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 33% of 19,675 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.583% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.66% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.83 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21K interactions, about 234x its own typical post.

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Fuera de Juego's engagement rate beats 33% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,675 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 35% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.01%, Fuera de Juego sits above the 10th percentile of the 198,354 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.14%
p750.665%
p902.52%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 198,354 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,930 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.14%
75th percentile0.665%
90th percentile2.52%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link8% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 8% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 137 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 13, 2026234x their median

    Tal vez Jhohan Romaña representó a toda la gente que quiere a Messi con ese abrazo. 🫂❤️ https://t.co/B0nIli7sLn

    20K1.1K2224255K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202676x their median

    El homenaje de Lego para Lionel Messi. 🩵🤍 (vía Lego/IG) https://t.co/NJk8xYB4sk

    6.0K9075343K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 202640x their median

    Lo lograron, juntos. 👫 https://t.co/StsYov8KHI

    3.5K1639974K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202612x their median

    La emoción de entrar con Messi al campo.🤩⚽️ https://t.co/s5S3KLy8GJ

    1.0K253030K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20269.1x their median

    ¡A Flick le gusta el agua fría! Como la cima de #LaLiga 🥶🧊 https://t.co/RCZwt0Ys7j

    799310156K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 20266.7x their median

    Sydney Schertenleib 🤝 Lamine Yamal. Cositas del Barcelona. 😎 https://t.co/vA3lsqT8In

    585240026K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20264.5x their median

    El Espanyol no se guardó nada y le dedicó un tweet a Vinicius.👀 https://t.co/2ZT9OrQUW7

    3602916229K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20264.3x their median

    Rodrigo de Paul dedicó su gol y dio homenaje a su amigo Leo Messi y su padre Jorge Messi.🫂⚽️ https://t.co/LQlbdJ0OgS

    367165029K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20263.7x their median

    Como voló para ese 🗣️ SIUUUUU... aunque no fue el gol 980. ⚽ https://t.co/qm6IEZS8Ke

    32483129K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20263.7x their median

    El adiós del eterno ‘10’ de Argentina.🇦🇷🐐👏 https://t.co/BtAS9bMegc

    28052104.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 91 interactions against 942K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 33% of 19,675 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.583% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.66% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.83 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21K interactions, about 234x its own typical post.

What is Fuera de Juego's engagement rate on X?
Fuera de Juego (@ESPN_FDJ) has an engagement rate of 0.01%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 942,360 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.01%, Fuera de Juego sits above the 10th percentile of the 198,354 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ESPN_FDJ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 33% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,675 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ESPN_FDJ post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going