Back to @ESPNLunardi's profile

Joe Lunardi engagement report

@ESPNLunardi - 290K followers on X

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.029%
of 290K followers
Per impression
0.162%
52K views on a typical post
Reach
17.8%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
84
interactions (median)
Saved
0.008%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.27/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Thursday

Early reading. We have captured 4 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 84 interactions against 290K followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Posts are seen about 52K times each, and 0.162% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 29K interactions, about 340x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.029%, Joe Lunardi sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,583 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video25% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link50% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 25% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 50% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 329 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 5, 2026340x their median

    Just received good news from my oncologist that my bloodwork results were very good. I keep 🙏🙏🙏 that the Immuno Therapy treatments are very effective in wiping out the cancer.

    27K51759038477K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 2026331x their median

    I am excited to report that my bloodwork reports came back that everything is positive - certainly happy to get that report from my oncologist. 🙏🙏🙏 were answered!

    27K45252333376K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026323x their median

    Just had the call I was 🙏🙏🙏 all day for from my oncologist Dr Rick Brown. He stated that my bloodwork results were very good . Great way to head into Labor Day weekend! Yes all the 🙏🙏🙏 I received were answered ! Let the parties begin baby !

    26K51265748437K viewsView on X
  • May 19, 2026105x their median

    Had exam this morning & happy to report from my oncologist that the bloodwork report was very positive . Now getting IMMUNOTHERAPY treatment ! 🙏🙏🙏 that these treatments wipe out the Melanoma found in my lungs & liver . Pray for minimum side effects ! https://t.co/WQYlDMr6DX

    5.4K110421114K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202625x their median

    On what would have been her 107th birthday, Loyola is proud to unveil a commemorative statue of Sister Jean Dolores Schmidt, BVM. https://t.co/lsTxqQfYjo

    1.9K1721927152K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202619x their median

    NEW: Former Florida State QB Thomas Castellanos and former Missouri forward Mark Mitchell have been granted a temporary injunction for a fifth year of eligibility, @TexasTrialGroup reports. https://t.co/MHkY1QINmp

    1.3K12475821.7M viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20269.9x their median

    Who do you want to see tee it up at Medinah in September? https://t.co/oPWLB1iWv9

    6152716623289K viewsView on X
  • Jun 29, 202613x their median

    🚨⛳️🏌️ #DISCUSSION — What club in your golf bag goes 75 yards? https://t.co/jABzt5QWr9

    2041541036232K viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 20267.5x their median

    545 yard Par-5 What are you hitting off this tee box 😵 https://t.co/Yln34AR5ej

    3131627228328K viewsView on X
  • Apr 7, 20215.0x their median

    Two shameless plugs: A cool read from @TriumphBooks and a silent version of me from @BobbleheadHall. One is actual size... 🏀🏀 https://t.co/mXLJGLHGUd

    2521714311View on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 84 interactions against 290K followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Posts are seen about 52K times each, and 0.162% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 29K interactions, about 340x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Joe Lunardi's engagement rate on X?
Joe Lunardi (@ESPNLunardi) has an engagement rate of 0.029%, based on the median interactions across 4 original posts from the last 30 days against 290,053 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.029%, Joe Lunardi sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ESPNLunardi have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @ESPNLunardi post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going