Back to @ESPNFC's profile

ESPN FC engagement report

@ESPNFC - 17M followers on X

Measured over 254 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.08%
of 17M followers
Per impression
5.04%
274K views on a typical post
Reach
1.58%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
14K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.044%
121 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
9.87/day
active 103% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 14K interactions against 17M followers, an engagement rate of 0.08%. Measured over 254 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 274K times each, and 5.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.58% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 9.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 254 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 98K interactions, about 7.1x its own typical post.

Measured over 254 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

ESPN FC's engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 90% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.08%, ESPN FC sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,491 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video96% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link5% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 96% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 144 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 23, 20267.1x their median

    Anthony Gordon had a wide open chance to score his first Barcelona goal and instead laid it off to Fermín Lopez. What an unselfish play for his second assist 👏 https://t.co/960uLGuAPL

    93K4.4K371149946K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20266.7x their median

    Ismael Saibari ran over to Jamal Musiala as soon as he saw Musiala was about to faint. Musiala partially fainted due to the heat and was cleared by Bayern's medical team after. The definition of a true teammate in Saibari ❤️ https://t.co/RE9ywir6Pq

    87K5.2K2841431.7M viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20266.5x their median

    Captain of FC Barcelona at the age of 19, Lamine Yamal ⭐️ https://t.co/sBhFMDcja2

    85K4.0K18182741K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20266.3x their median

    Fenerbahçe has some serious talent on their squad this season 😳🔥 https://t.co/AoxtiNCaxK

    82K4.0K7403712.8M viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20266.2x their median

    Pedri putting the captain armband on Raphinha ❤️ https://t.co/l5oElyJkAu

    81K4.4K1901722.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20265.8x their median

    Barcelona's summer signings so far 👀 Added quality all over the pitch 🔥 https://t.co/VpZbmjVLvt

    76K4.1K260111645K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20265.3x their median

    South Sudanese kids surrounded Hamza Abdelkarim and Omar Marmoush after their country’s 5-0 loss to Egypt. Football is for everyone ❤️🇸🇸🇪🇬 (📸 @EgyptNT) https://t.co/1iBQyIf0XS

    69K4.2K4493942.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20265.2x their median

    Leão and Osimhen together for Galatasaray. Warning to all the defenders in Türkiye 🇹🇷😈🔥 https://t.co/tSHbJPqr9I

    69K3.0K157571.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20265.1x their median

    Unai Simón, Nico Williams and Aymeric Laporte got a standing ovation with the World Cup by their side before their first LALIGA match 🏆 👏 https://t.co/bh9aU79VDY

    67K3.0K1691014.5M viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20265.0x their median

    Messi rewatching his legacy play out in a drone show 😯 https://t.co/N5u6pzTh6P

    63K6.6K15865589K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 14K interactions against 17M followers, an engagement rate of 0.08%. Measured over 254 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 274K times each, and 5.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.58% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 9.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 254 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 98K interactions, about 7.1x its own typical post.

What is ESPN FC's engagement rate on X?
ESPN FC (@ESPNFC) has an engagement rate of 0.08%, based on the median interactions across 254 original posts from the last 30 days against 17,350,007 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.08%, ESPN FC sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ESPNFC have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ESPNFC post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 9.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going