PlayerSells
Back to @ESPNBET's profile

ESPN BET engagement report

@ESPNBET - 4.9M followers on X

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.003%
of 4.9M followers
Per impression
0.185%
82K views on a typical post
Reach
1.67%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
152
interactions (median)
Saved
0.005%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.87/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 152 interactions against 4.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 82K times each, and 0.185% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.67% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21K interactions, about 141x its own typical post.

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

ESPN BET's engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 20% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, ESPN BET sits above the 10th percentile of the 9,981 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.007%.

p100.001%
p250.007%
p50 (median)0.047%
p750.325%
p902.60%
p99357.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 9,981 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 447,404 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.007%
50th percentile0.047%
75th percentile0.325%
90th percentile2.60%
99th percentile357.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%15K
01:00 UTC+4%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-5%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%17K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%29K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%30K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%24K
20:00 UTC0%22K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%17K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+8%59K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%94K
Wednesday-4%78K
Thursday-3%71K
Friday-5%73K
Saturday+2%64K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+79%+73% to +85%5.8K
Outbound link0% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.1K
Typical length--7%-8% to -5%9.0K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 104 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 7% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 12, 2026141x their median

    Everyone was betting on Conor McGregor 😬 https://t.co/yGYMLJKNFn

    18K9011.4K9631.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202668x their median

    THE CHRISTMAS DAY SPORTS SCHEDULE IS INCREDIBLE πŸ˜±πŸŽ„ https://t.co/iD8NHJFBUt

    8.4K1.4K195361805K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 202612x their median

    The Eagles are calling three-peat πŸ¦… You betting on Philly going back-to-back-to-back in the NFC east? https://t.co/0nV48nrhLa

    1.7K1291815157K viewsView on X
  • Jul 12, 202612x their median

    Tough way for the fight to end and to lose a Conor McGregor bet 😭 https://t.co/lwKTD1pBRW

    1.5K10216979111K viewsView on X
  • Jul 12, 20269.8x their median

    PADDY THE BADDY WAS THE UNDERDOG AND GOT THE SUBMISSION IN 52 SECONDS 🀯 https://t.co/h7WrJfBeqT

    1.4K516148K viewsView on X
  • Jul 8, 20269.4x their median

    The Notorious hasn't fought in almost five years 😳 Are you betting for him to win in his first fight back? πŸ’° https://t.co/YTPHUiTjgu

    1.3K436724196K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 20267.9x their median

    Lionel Messi and Argentina are inevitable 🐐 https://t.co/J7rPArLZVE

    1.1K5315227K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20267.6x their median

    After working out for the Rams this past Wednesday, Aaron Donald jumps to the 4th favorite for Comeback Player of the Year 😳 https://t.co/nuHc3wNwak

    1.1K51256158K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20267.1x their median

    Who are you betting for NL MVP? πŸ’° πŸ’Έ Pete Crow-Armstrong (-120) πŸ’Έ Shohei Ohtani (+100) https://t.co/srwzh8024i

    970454416110K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20266.3x their median

    Are you betting on the King taking his talents back to South Beach? πŸ‘‘ https://t.co/jvbMaKrGmt

    812616710112K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 152 interactions against 4.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 82K times each, and 0.185% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.67% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21K interactions, about 141x its own typical post.

What is ESPN BET's engagement rate on X?
ESPN BET (@ESPNBET) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 22 original posts from the last 30 days against 4,904,218 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, ESPN BET sits above the 10th percentile of the 9,981 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ESPNBET have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ESPNBET post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going