Back to @ESEA's profile

ESEA League engagement report

@ESEA - 212K followers on X

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.017%
of 212K followers
Per impression
0.518%
6.8K views on a typical post
Reach
3.19%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
35
interactions (median)
Saved
0.015%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.43/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 35 interactions against 212K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.8K times each, and 0.518% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.19% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video, 44% are part of a thread and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.4K interactions, about 41x its own typical post.

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

ESEA League's engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 27% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.017%, ESEA League sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video92% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link8% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 92% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 8% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 264 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 2, 202641x their median

    After years of grinding @ShindeNgg are the first all-Argentine team to reach an ESL Pro League LAN. During their climb, they played 16,658 FACEIT games, and each player earned Challenger Rank in every CS2 season. Congratulations @tom1jed @abizzcs_ @ivzquintana @naz_cs @FraGuTyy https://t.co/YkBOENLlRa

    1.3K83191165K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 202629x their median

    An iconic return to ESEA. Three years after his last match, @summit1g found D1NK Esports through our new Team Finder. Here’s how he performed in his first match back. Check out the Team Finder today and connect with active rosters looking for players. https://t.co/k9mKB0Yu2l

    9782121274K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202614x their median

    .@summit1g's first step into ESEA League began in 2009, at 22 years old. 17 years and three versions of Counter-Strike later, he's still hungry to compete. Sign up to compete in Season 59 below. https://t.co/Dw5AZoDDJV

    458812247K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 202611x their median

    Turning 1,600 applicants into a full lineup. @izaklive dedicated 50 hours of tryouts to scout for top talent and give four rising players the chance to team up alongside him in ESEA Entry. Take a look at their team stats so far. https://t.co/wuPQNrxp9E

    38575030K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20267.9x their median

    Summit joins a new roster for Season 59. 16 years after saying “nobody ever quits, they always come back” in an ESEA reply, @summit1g is now listed alongside @Mendo and company for the upcoming season. Build or join a team and register by September 29. https://t.co/GPXTajRWL1

    26275331K viewsView on X
  • Jul 5, 20265.5x their median

    Server location is moving away from vetoes. Instead, captains rank their team’s server locations from best to worst, and for each match, the system uses both teams’ rankings to determine the fairest shared location. Rank your location preferences today. https://t.co/4yIvzOFc9h

    23147030K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20264.7x their median

    Important update regarding the Season Finals in Europe. Fever Squad has been disqualified after one of its players, bAtoNn52, was banned for ban evasion. The affected branch of the bracket will be replayed from Round 3 tomorrow.

    14886216K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20264.6x their median

    Last week, we banned a player on team Flat Earth for ban evasion. As a result, four of their matches in the North America Intermediate group have been overturned. Good luck to all legitimate teams ahead of playoffs.

    15613014K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20263.7x their median

    Some of Counter-Strike's top creators have stacked up in ESEA. With a lineup featuring the likes of @Stewie, @tarik, @Ska, @autimaticTV, and more, the squad is taking on the league and currently sits in 1st place in their group standings. Take a look at their team stats so far. https://t.co/3Bv6akdJHS

    12432111K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20263.6x their median

    The ESEA League Season 58 Finals are underway. 20 EU teams, 16 NA teams, and 4 OCE teams have secured their spots, with matches covered by @HLTVorg and VRS points on the line. Good luck to those who qualified! https://t.co/OfCESTNndr

    104125514K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 35 interactions against 212K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.8K times each, and 0.518% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.19% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video, 44% are part of a thread and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.4K interactions, about 41x its own typical post.

What is ESEA League's engagement rate on X?
ESEA League (@ESEA) has an engagement rate of 0.017%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 211,551 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.017%, ESEA League sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ESEA have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ESEA post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going