EPL Bible engagement report
@EPLBible - 646K followers on X
Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 182 interactions against 646K followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 42K times each, and 0.429% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.57% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 97x its own typical post.
Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
EPL Bible's engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 29% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.028%, EPL Bible sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.016% |
| 50th percentile | 0.1% |
| 75th percentile | 0.499% |
| 90th percentile | 2.09% |
| 99th percentile | 119.6% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 92% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 8% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 92% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 8% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 89 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 1, 202697x their median
I can’t believe this is the Premier League champions 😳 https://t.co/7L6ZGBfYBW
- Sep 1, 202676x their median
A reminder how Enzo treated Mount on his return to Stamford Bridge. What a pretender! 😂 https://t.co/SngqzkJmhu
- Aug 30, 202644x their median
That is absolutely shocking by Kyle Walker. 🤣 https://t.co/4lZmGzgXYv
- Aug 31, 202614x their median
A real generational talent. https://t.co/WpoIoBac9M
- Aug 30, 202614x their median
So Maguire handballs it, goes on then to shoot, the ball goes in And the goal still stands, what have I just watched 😂 https://t.co/0UQC2lmoRf
- Aug 30, 20266.6x their median
That response is 10/10. 😂👏 https://t.co/i9cQ9dChq7
- Sep 1, 20264.5x their median
Match-day two and prime suspect Gabriel is starting where he left off It’s all so tiresome 😴 https://t.co/Yr6ZNxff7E
- Aug 30, 20264.0x their median
Cole Palmer’s goal from this angle… What a player! 🎯 https://t.co/vlIr8Lp9PP
- Aug 30, 20263.9x their median
Old Trafford season tickets have been upgraded with a free shower this season. 😍👏 https://t.co/aDZM3pU2bs
- Aug 30, 20263.6x their median
Van Dijk wiping his snot on McAtee’s back. VAR must have been sleeping 😴 https://t.co/ZRCXsq1z9U
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 182 interactions against 646K followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 42K times each, and 0.429% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.57% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 97x its own typical post.
- What is EPL Bible's engagement rate on X?
- EPL Bible (@EPLBible) has an engagement rate of 0.028%, based on the median interactions across 39 original posts from the last 30 days against 646,038 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.028%, EPL Bible sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @EPLBible have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @EPLBible post?
- Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.