Back to @EPLBible's profile

EPL Bible engagement report

@EPLBible - 646K followers on X

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.028%
of 646K followers
Per impression
0.429%
42K views on a typical post
Reach
6.57%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
182
interactions (median)
Saved
0.021%
9 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 182 interactions against 646K followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 42K times each, and 0.429% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.57% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 97x its own typical post.

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

EPL Bible's engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 29% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.028%, EPL Bible sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,258 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,968 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video92% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link8% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 92% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 8% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 89 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 1, 202697x their median

    I can’t believe this is the Premier League champions 😳 https://t.co/7L6ZGBfYBW

    16K1.1K3562671.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202676x their median

    A reminder how Enzo treated Mount on his return to Stamford Bridge. What a pretender! 😂 https://t.co/SngqzkJmhu

    13K7661311181.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202644x their median

    That is absolutely shocking by Kyle Walker. 🤣 https://t.co/4lZmGzgXYv

    7.6K22498822.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202614x their median

    A real generational talent. https://t.co/WpoIoBac9M

    2.4K1152717242K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202614x their median

    So Maguire handballs it, goes on then to shoot, the ball goes in And the goal still stands, what have I just watched 😂 https://t.co/0UQC2lmoRf

    1.9K211268102348K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20266.6x their median

    That response is 10/10. 😂👏 https://t.co/i9cQ9dChq7

    1.1K5233169K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20264.5x their median

    Match-day two and prime suspect Gabriel is starting where he left off It’s all so tiresome 😴 https://t.co/Yr6ZNxff7E

    6984165997K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20264.0x their median

    Cole Palmer’s goal from this angle… What a player! 🎯 https://t.co/vlIr8Lp9PP

    689325542K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20263.9x their median

    Old Trafford season tickets have been upgraded with a free shower this season. 😍👏 https://t.co/aDZM3pU2bs

    61278131455K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20263.6x their median

    Van Dijk wiping his snot on McAtee’s back. VAR must have been sleeping 😴 https://t.co/ZRCXsq1z9U

    6172611798K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 182 interactions against 646K followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 42K times each, and 0.429% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.57% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 97x its own typical post.

What is EPL Bible's engagement rate on X?
EPL Bible (@EPLBible) has an engagement rate of 0.028%, based on the median interactions across 39 original posts from the last 30 days against 646,038 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.028%, EPL Bible sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @EPLBible have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @EPLBible post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going