Back to @EASFCDirect's profile

EA SPORTS FC Direct Communication engagement report

@EASFCDirect - 1.3M followers on X

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.092%
of 1.3M followers
Per impression
0.446%
262K views on a typical post
Reach
20.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.015%
40 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.092%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 262K times each, and 0.446% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 20.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 20% carry an image or video, 20% are part of a thread and 40% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.7K interactions, about 4.8x its own typical post.

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026. Recurring tag: #fc27.

Compared with accounts its own size

EA SPORTS FC Direct Communication's engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 30% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.092%, EA SPORTS FC Direct Communication sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,027 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.127%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,027 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,983 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video20% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link40% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 20% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 40% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 269 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 22, 20264.8x their median

    Tomorrow we're looking to release a small update to address some of the bugs you've been telling us about, and some of your Closed Beta feedback. This will not be an update that changes gameplay balance and tuning significantly. We want to continue preserving the Early Access and launch gameplay tuning while giving you plenty of time to learn and adapt. We're also looking into other bugs you've reported to us for future updates, you can keep an eye on those investigations and see the full v1.0.1 update notes on our Tracker: https://t.co/UenZCvNb2E

    4.6K1238321371.8M viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 20264.6x their median

    We’re sorry for the ongoing matchmaking issues in Clubs, we know how frustrating it’s been to try and get matches with your squads. Title Update 1.6.4 introduced an intermittent live issue that we tried to fix with an emergency title update 1.6.5. However, final testing revealed an additional bug that could cause further issues, so we are taking extra precautions. We expect to be able to get this fix live in the upcoming days. Once the fix is live, all players will receive an Archetype progression grant. Thank you for your patience while we get this right. Full TU notes have been posted on the EASFC Tracker. https://t.co/2TAA0ZD5LJ

    4.5K1366721311.0M viewsView on X
  • Jun 12, 20266.9x their median

    We are aware of an issue where the Asia and Oceania Objectives are displaying incorrect rewards. Restarting FC 26 should resolve this issue. Players who did not receive the correct Objective rewards will be contacted at a later date with the appropriate content.

    1.5K612.0K62924K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 20263.1x their median

    We are investigating reports that some players are unable to matchmake in Clubs. We'll provide another update when available.

    2.1K641.3K1712.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20262.7x their median

    We’ve heard the feedback from the Clubs community around Stamina and how it’s impacting the Clubs experience. Based on the feedback, we’ll be re-introducing long-term fatigue in Clubs in a future title update ahead of worldwide launch. We’ll look to share further details in the Patch Notes for the Title Update, and will continue to monitor your feedback once the change is live.

    2.5K6144346525K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20262.7x their median

    Earlier today we shared some incorrect timelines for the Web App and Companion App. We've updated the Pitch Notes with the correct information, which is: Web App: The EA SPORTS FC™ 27 Web App launches on 16 September at 17:00 UTC. Companion App: The EA SPORTS FC™ 27 Companion App refresh goes live on 17 September at 17:00 UTC.

    2.8K6818028680K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20262.6x their median

    We are actively investigating reports that some players are experiencing errors when attempting to access Clubs. We'll provide another update when available.

    2.6K4128162472K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20262.3x their median

    Tomorrow we're looking to drop another small FC 27 update to tackle some bugs and stability issues. No gameplay balancing or tuning changes. Full update notes are on the EASFC Tracker. https://t.co/GD7Kw5DnT2

    2.2K6543342560K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20262.1x their median

    We are aware and investigating reports that some players are receiving Gold Player Items instead of TOTW Player Items from certain packs in FC 27. We'll provide another update when available.

    2.0K4035791735K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20262.1x their median

    We have removed the FUT Champions TOTW Player Pick Packs from the Champions Token Store as we investigate a related issue. The Champions TOTW Player Pick Packs will return in a future Champions week.

    2.1K31274321.1M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#fc27

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.092%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 262K times each, and 0.446% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 20.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 20% carry an image or video, 20% are part of a thread and 40% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.7K interactions, about 4.8x its own typical post.

What is EA SPORTS FC Direct Communication's engagement rate on X?
EA SPORTS FC Direct Communication (@EASFCDirect) has an engagement rate of 0.092%, based on the median interactions across 30 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,266,610 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.092%, EA SPORTS FC Direct Communication sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,027 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @EASFCDirect have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @EASFCDirect post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going