Back to @Dune's profile

Dune engagement report

@Dune - 842K followers on X

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.004%
of 842K followers
Per impression
0.216%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
1.74%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
31
interactions (median)
Saved
0.028%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.23/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 31 interactions against 842K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 22% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.216% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.70% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video and 91% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 377 interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Dune's engagement rate beats 22% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 16% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.004%, Dune sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video74% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link91% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 74% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 91% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 374 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 22, 202612x their median

    .@HyperliquidX HyperCore is now live on Dune. $1.43T has traded on HyperCore year to date across 785.6M trades, and that activity is now available on Dune. It includes every order, fill, and cancel, the order book itself, account activity like transfers, vaults, staking, and liquidations, and the HIP-3 and HIP-4 markets built on top of it. Explore the Hyperliquid dashboard on Dune → https://t.co/0NbXCGvSdY

    29442281350K viewsView on X
  • Jun 4, 202611x their median

    The line between crypto and finance is closing. SEC clearing agencies are crypto-native. DTCC is tokenizing on public chains. Banks are issuing stablecoins. Today we're launching Digital Asset Brief — a biweekly publication for the teams operating at the seam. https://t.co/fgkwDKzQit

    16421161568K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20267.6x their median

    Four fee streams are now routing to FIRE. FAssets minting. Redemptions. Destination tags. FDC attestations. One governed pool, one mandate: reduce FLR supply. It's early, it's on-chain, and every dollar is queryable on @Dune → https://t.co/COvLy4Dats https://t.co/spAwT1JMKq

    172518640K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20265.0x their median

    . @arc is now live on Dune. Arc, a Layer-1 blockchain developed by Circle for stablecoin finance, launches mainnet today, with DTCC, ICE, and MoneyGram among the founding validators helping secure the network. Payments, FX, lending, treasury, capital markets settlement, all Arc data is on Dune from the first block. https://t.co/imhgqjwT6I

    1161420517K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20264.8x their median

    1/5 @MidnightNtwrk is now live on Dune. The privacy-enhancing L1, and first partner chain to @Cardano, keeps sensitive data shielded. Its public state is now available on Dune, queryable, visualizable, and verifiable from day one. Here's what the data shows 🧵 https://t.co/k9qjr5YoSP

    1092210740K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20264.4x their median

    We're changing free plan access on Dune. If you created your account before July 21, 2026: starting September 10, your free plan becomes view-only. You can continue to browse everything on Dune, but running queries will require a paid plan. Your existing work stays saved, and you'll get 14 days of Plus to try out all paid features, automatically activated for your account on Sep 10th. The detailed migration plan and upgrade offers are in your inbox. If you created your account after July 21, 2026: nothing changes.

    794332135K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20263.2x their median

    1/ Who actually pays for priority on Ethereum? Continuing our Block Building series, with the first half of a two-part deep dive into the state of Ethereum block building since 2024: The demand side. We mapped Ethereum’s priority fee landscape since 2024 to understand which orderflow sources drive block values and how this composition of valuable orderflow has changed over time. All data is available in a public, forward-maintained @Dune dashboard tracking how Ethereum’s orderflow landscape evolves. Part II will examine how builders compete to serve this orderflow. @JaschaSamadi

    74851328K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20263.0x their median

    Real-world assets are moving onchain, but market size is only the first question. The harder questions are about what happens after issuance: - Who holds the assets? - Where do they move? - Which DeFi protocols use them as collateral? - How are they priced and traded? Dune’s Real-World Assets dataset gives institutions the full onchain picture of distributed RWAs: registry, transfers, trades, balances, and perpetual positioning across 5,100+ registered tokens, 19 chains, 30+ asset types, and 70+ tokenization platforms. For issuers, asset managers, banks, ratings agencies, and hedge funds, RWA data is becoming an operating layer, not just a market-size chart. Explore the RWA collection: https://t.co/Er8BUdpCis

    591217531K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20262.7x their median

    Prediction markets already function as a live read on Fed policy. The chart shows implied expected Fed cuts for 2025, Kalshi vs Polymarket, updated daily. The two venues move within a tight band of each other most of the year, with the widest gap opening up around April 2025. That gap, and how fast it closed, could be a signal. Fed-related markets have already passed 2025’s full-year count, rising from 535 in 2025 to 822 so far in 2026. Notional volume is at $984M+ YTD, already 89% of 2025’s full-year total. For a desk running its own rate view, that's a continuous cross-check sitting next to futures and swaps. Explore Prediction Markets data on Dune: https://t.co/T2Hx6yxKfS

    571016035K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20262.7x their median

    Real-world assets made up under 5% of Hyperliquid's volume in January. In July, RWA share has topped 50% on several trading days. Crude oil and silver combined have traded over $120B year to date via HIP-3, one slice of the HyperCore data Dune now decodes in full, from order flow to prediction-market trades. Explore the Hyperliquid dashboard on Dune → https://t.co/a5fB90CPn5

    62613231K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 31 interactions against 842K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 22% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.216% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.70% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video and 91% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 377 interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

What is Dune's engagement rate on X?
Dune (@Dune) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 23 original posts from the last 30 days against 842,277 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.004%, Dune sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Dune have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 22% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Dune post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.23 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going