Back to @DuncanBannatyne's profile

Duncan Bannatyne engagement report

@DuncanBannatyne - 648K followers on X

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.293%
of 648K followers
Per impression
2.35%
81K views on a typical post
Reach
12.5%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.9K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.026%
21 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.7/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 648K followers, an engagement rate of 0.293%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 81K times each, and 2.35% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 39% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 28K interactions, about 15x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #agenda2030, #istandwithsallgrover.

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026. Recurring tags: #agenda2030, #istandwithsallgrover.

Compared with accounts its own size

Duncan Bannatyne's engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 71% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.293%, Duncan Bannatyne sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video39% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link17% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 39% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 17% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 369 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 8, 202615x their median

    A Restore Britain investigation has uncovered that hundreds of thousands of asylum seekers have been given 'free NHS prescriptions, dental treatment, wigs and fabric support, sight tests, vouchers towards the cost of glasses or contact lenses, and necessary travel costs to and from hospital for NHS treatment'. This is not a joke, or a hoax. It is a piss take. This has been uncovered through FOIs, directly from the NHS Business Services Authority, about HC2 certificates which qualify them. There is a simple answer. Mass deportations. That is exactly what a Restore Britain Government will do. No 'reviews', just deportations.

    22K4.8K502110334K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 202615x their median

    So many people on X now saying the government is the people smugglers Do you agree with them?

    21K3.0K2.9K301158K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20267.6x their median

    So lets get this right. Our unelected pm andy Burnham has said we should stockpile food because of a Russian attack, but he's stopped the armed forces from training to save money. This guy is a bigger cxxt than starmer. https://t.co/mY32IHisth

    12K2.1K40663104K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20266.2x their median

    FYI… here’s the next Queen, the future King and the current 3rd-in-line to the Throne walking to school in central London. Perfectly safe, with no issues. So tell us - why can’t the current 5th, 6th and 7th-in-line to the throne do the same? 🤷 https://t.co/8qdq3i6wgh

    11K72843847457K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20265.3x their median

    Andy Burnham says when people are "causing fear and intimidation in communities" by covering their faces you "have to prevent them doing that" The people who are causing fear and intimidation in our communities are unvetted illegal migrants. The man is completely out of touch https://t.co/lOkNqUXZv2

    7.7K1.6K62981100K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20264.9x their median

    This month’s Prime Minister Andy Burnham @andyburnham has just announced he’s increasing foreign aid to 0.7% of GDP, which is £21 billion per year. Let me put that in context for you. The average amount of income tax paid per year by basic rate taxpayers in the UK is £2,700. So that means that nearly 8 million taxpayers in the UK are working all year ONLY to give their wages to foreign governments. There are 30 million basic rate taxpayers in the UK, so one in four people that you see working in restaurants or pubs, nurses, cleaners and many more are paying all of their tax to foreign countries. Countries like Pakistan that can afford nuclear weapons, to India that can afford a space programme, to China that can afford to buy the world, to Somalia that doesn’t have a government, only warlords. Etc etc etc etc etc. One in eight British basic rate taxpayers are paying all of their money not to schools in this country. Not for hospitals in this country, nor to fix the roads, nor anything whatsoever in Britain. Every penny goes abroad. Eight million people here giving their hard earned money to the British government who then give every penny away. Every single penny. So, if you’ve ever wondered why things aren’t improving in this country and wonder what happens to the money you’ve made from your toil and your sleepless nights of wondering how you’ll pay the next bill, that’s what happens to it. 8 million of you are working for foreign governments. Think about that.

    6.4K2.4K386166159K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20264.9x their median

    Notice how barely any newspapers have mentioned the Reform scandal? Not one front page. Farage doesn’t usually struggle to make the news. This is how the media operates. That’s why I call for press regulation. They’re apparently ‘against him’ yet close ranks to protect him.

    7.6K1.6K9814107K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20263.9x their median

    The Uk doesn’t have a First Lady!

    6.5K4783353681K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20263.4x their median

    This is a must watch if you really want to understand what Labour are doing to our economy.. https://t.co/zqkHNTr2DF

    4.4K1.8K176158304K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20263.2x their median

    Nottingham’s “face-covering ban” has a HUGE loophole. The burka is exempt. So you can be fined £70 - or face further prosecution - for covering your face, but certain people can still legally completely conceal their identity behind a burka. Nottingham's Labour council leader says this is about keeping people safe. Then apply the rules to everyone. No loopholes. No exemptions.

    5.1K7172482195K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#agenda2030#istandwithsallgrover

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 648K followers, an engagement rate of 0.293%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 81K times each, and 2.35% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 39% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 28K interactions, about 15x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #agenda2030, #istandwithsallgrover.

What is Duncan Bannatyne's engagement rate on X?
Duncan Bannatyne (@DuncanBannatyne) has an engagement rate of 0.293%, based on the median interactions across 23 original posts from the last 30 days against 648,233 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.293%, Duncan Bannatyne sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DuncanBannatyne have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @DuncanBannatyne post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going