Back to @Dra_Miriane's profile

Dra. Miriane Ferreira engagement report

@Dra_Miriane - 84K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.473%
of 84K followers
Per impression
4.51%
8.8K views on a typical post
Reach
10.5%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
398
interactions (median)
Saved
0.323%
28 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.27/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 398 interactions against 84K followers, an engagement rate of 0.473%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 77% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 8.8K times each, and 4.51% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.8K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Dra. Miriane Ferreira's engagement rate beats 77% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 85% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.473%, Dra. Miriane Ferreira sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video75% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 75% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 621 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 26, 202612x their median

    https://t.co/PVwesRfIrz

    4.6K139241137K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 202611x their median

    O Afeganistão não perdeu os direitos das mulheres de um dia para o outro. Tudo aconteceu em etapas. Cada medida parecia pequena. Cada justificativa parecia razoável. Cada mudança era apresentada como modernização, proteção ou necessidade. Até que, quando perceberam, o sistema já havia mudado completamente. Foi essa lógica que me fez olhar com tanta preocupação para algumas propostas que hoje tramitam no Brasil. Este vídeo não compara a realidade brasileira com a do Afeganistão. Compara um método: quando problemas do sistema passam a ser resolvidos reduzindo a proteção justamente de quem tem menos força para resistir. Por isso, acredito que nenhuma retirada de direitos pode ser tratada como um detalhe. Assista até o fim e tire suas próprias conclusões. E, se você entende que esse debate precisa chegar a mais pessoas, compartilhe este vídeo. O abaixo-assinado está no link da minha bio.

    3.6K832442261K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 202611x their median

    https://t.co/RgsdFZabNt

    3.7K5751584258K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 202611x their median

    Absurdo! https://t.co/LSFEOtV514

    3.7K452602881K viewsView on X
  • Jul 2, 20269.6x their median

    Você já assistiu essa serie? https://t.co/1D87dX5nqg

    3.2K516492763K viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 20269.5x their median

    O que você faria no lugar dela? https://t.co/HbbDGjWyP6

    2.7K41728273423K viewsView on X
  • Jul 18, 20269.1x their median

    Qual a sua opinião? https://t.co/qdGGy7EETd

    3.4K2512420168K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 20262.7x their median

    Qual a opinião de vocês? https://t.co/pcXSCHiWCX

    1.0K367971K viewsView on X
  • Jul 12, 20262.3x their median

    Qual a sua opinião? https://t.co/Upb7iHAYZx

    8771638039K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.1x their median

    O STF decidiu que medida protetiva não depende de o homem ser marido, ex, namorado ou parente. Mas isso está sendo mal contado por aí. O caso que chegou ao Supremo foi o de uma mulher de Formiga, em Minas, perseguida pelo vizinho. Segundo o processo, ele a seguia, dizia que queria se casar com ela e ameaçava matá-la se ela não aceitasse. Ela pediu proteção e a Justiça de Minas negou, porque entre os dois não havia relação familiar nem afetiva. Ou seja, ela estava sendo ameaçada de morte e a resposta foi que ela não se encaixava. Agora, mulher perseguida ou ameaçada por vizinho, colega, chefe, cliente ou desconhecido pode pedir medida protetiva. E aqui está a parte que estão distorcendo. Não é qualquer desavença entre um homem e uma mulher. É violência baseada no gênero, aquela que existe porque ela é mulher. Perseguição, ameaça, assédio, a lógica de que ela é obrigada a aceitar. Briga por causa de barulho não é isso, e ninguém disse que é. Vale lembrar também o que se pede numa protetiva. Que ele não chegue perto e não entre em contato. Não é prisão, não é condenação, não é ficha suja. Vale enquanto durar o risco. A proteção foi ampliada e ainda assim continua insuficiente diante do que acontece com a gente todos os dias. Toda proteção para mulher é pouco. Se você está sendo ameaçada ou perseguida, procure a Delegacia da Mulher, o Ministério Público ou a Defensoria. Medida protetiva não custa nada e não precisa de advogado. O 180 atende de graça, todos os dias, a qualquer hora.

    65711441517K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 398 interactions against 84K followers, an engagement rate of 0.473%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 77% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 8.8K times each, and 4.51% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.8K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

What is Dra. Miriane Ferreira's engagement rate on X?
Dra. Miriane Ferreira (@Dra_Miriane) has an engagement rate of 0.473%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 84,108 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.473%, Dra. Miriane Ferreira sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Dra_Miriane have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 77% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Dra_Miriane post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going