Back to @Dr_SadiaAz's profile

Sadia A πŸ‡΅πŸ‡° engagement report

@Dr_SadiaAz - 77K followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.091%
of 77K followers
Per impression
2.05%
3.4K views on a typical post
Reach
4.44%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
70
interactions (median)
Saved
0.059%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 70 interactions against 77K followers, an engagement rate of 0.091%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.4K times each, and 2.05% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.43% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 45% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.7K interactions, about 124x its own typical post.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Sadia A πŸ‡΅πŸ‡°'s engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 4 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 62% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.091%, Sadia A πŸ‡΅πŸ‡° sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.5%
p902.09%
p99119.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,536 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,995 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.5%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video45% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 45% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 221 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 21, 2016124x their median

    "If a Durood z written in a book by someone, Angels of Allah shower blessings on him till it remains in that book" https://t.co/qsN93XQaif

    6.9K1.3K42726View on X
  • Sep 6, 20265.3x their median

    پی ٹی ؒئی Ψ’ΩΫŒΨ΄Ω„ Ω†Ϋ’ ٹویٹ ΪˆΫŒΩ„ΫŒΩΉ Ϊ©Ψ± دی https://t.co/2NYrwf9TGt

    3122130633K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20264.9x their median

    Ziarat Cross Attack On 3 September, terrorists from FAK/FAH ambushed the Assistant Commissioner Harnai's convoy under FC escort. Troops fought back, but we lost 8 brave sons in the line of duty. Reinforcements are now on-site conducting area sanitisation.

    24528531491K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20262.9x their median

    If you are looking to find residence in Lahore, DONOT CONSIDER DHA!!!🀬😑 There is no GAS facility! If there is, its just for 3 4 hours distributed in the day! Thats it! You'll have to buy electric stove and give thousands in electricity bill. Or get a gas cylinder and fill it by going on your car, fuel your car (in petrol hike) and deal with the day! This is Maryam safdar ka Lahore. Jab lahore ati hoon i cant get access to basic necessities even! SHAME ON PUNJAB GOVT! SHAME ON LAHORIS who have normalised this gas and electricity loadshedding shit!

    1461638511K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20262.6x their median

    Petrol up by rs 12 New market price 359 Mian jee tun k rakhoo

    15618726.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026

    Balochistan bleeds again!!!! And u wont hear the noise much! Front line soldiers deserve alot more than living like lone warriors thrown time and again in front of the enemy without revenge. Their blood cant be so cheap! When will they wake up to protect their own instead of meddling in politics!

    6212522.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026

    Saim Ayub traveled from Caribbean to Birmingham for this duck πŸ˜” https://t.co/6hFHEn2oPf

    5441113.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 2026

    I still cant get over the fact that this drunk woman Natasha, who was behind the Karsaz incident is acquitted!!! Unreal!!! Ye kon log hain jinko adaaltain day rakhi hain! Heard Gul ahmed, the brand is behind her!πŸ₯² https://t.co/R8brnxzxD2

    36171012.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 2026

    Call for Charity! A genuine case of househelp who needs medical assistance with treatment of a patient with persistent pain who happens to be her husband. Due to financial turmoil and recent health issues, the husband isnt able to fulfil the needs of family of 6. Now with hospital visits everyday, they've reached a point where they are forced to ask for donations to bear a living! Doctor has advised tests, medicines and then further treatments for which she needs help. Target amount 25k Anyone interested, please dm.

    1816413.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 2026

    call me antisocial, but please don’t call me!

    202312.2K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 70 interactions against 77K followers, an engagement rate of 0.091%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.4K times each, and 2.05% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.43% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 45% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.7K interactions, about 124x its own typical post.

What is Sadia A πŸ‡΅πŸ‡°'s engagement rate on X?
Sadia A πŸ‡΅πŸ‡° (@Dr_SadiaAz) has an engagement rate of 0.091%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 76,902 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.091%, Sadia A πŸ‡΅πŸ‡° sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Dr_SadiaAz have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Dr_SadiaAz post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going