Back to @DrTomFrieden's profile

Dr. Tom Frieden engagement report

@DrTomFrieden - 234K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.007%
of 234K followers
Per impression
0.306%
5.1K views on a typical post
Reach
2.16%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
16
interactions (median)
Saved
0.049%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.27/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 16 interactions against 234K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.1K times each, and 0.306% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 63% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.4K interactions, about 85x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Dr. Tom Frieden's engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 17% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.007%, Dr. Tom Frieden sits above the 10th percentile of the 68,879 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.5%
p902.09%
p99116.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 68,879 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 55,257 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.5%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile116.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video88% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link63% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 63% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 298 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 27, 202685x their median

    The screwworm barrier worked for nearly six decades because people funded and staffed it. Because we let down our guard, the vampire pathogen is back, and could cost billions of dollars to control. https://t.co/InRVNWVyTO https://t.co/9P9nhei6ZS

    90642216924K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202632x their median

    Federal vaccine recommendations may change, but the facts haven’t. Vaccines have saved millions of lives from preventable disease and are essential to children's health. https://t.co/sxKYc7ftLX

    346103115181K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 202621x their median

    A new executive order injects disproven claims into the process by which doctors and nurses advise parents and, if followed, will result in more illness, hospitalizations, and deaths of American children. Although concern for the number of childhood vaccine doses is understandable, multiple studies show the plain truth: —Spreading vaccines out over more visits does not reduce any risk of adverse reactions, but is certain to increase the number of children unprotected from serious, preventable illness because vaccine series aren’t completed, and to increase parental days lost from work and patient costs; —There is no evidence that subjecting children to three shots instead of one with the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine would do anything to protect children, and it would result in more stressful and painful vaccinations; —Although moving to "shared clinical decision-making” for vaccines such as hepatitis B and rotavirus sounds reasonable, it would be a deadly mistake. Shared decision-making is appropriate when the risks and benefits of an intervention are equally balanced. In the case of these and other vaccines, the risks are vastly lower than the benefits of vaccination. Doctors don’t engage in shared clinical decision-making about whether to suture a bleeding wound. Parents are always free to accept physician recommendations or not, but failing to recommend something that is proven to be beneficial is an abdication of federal responsibility. For more than 60 years, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) was a model for the world in transparent, fact-based decision-making. Replacing that process with a presidential directive and pressuring states to weaken school requirements are giant steps backward. Parents have to make tough decisions every day to care for their children and need sound, evidence-based guidance. This executive order undermines the ability of doctors and nurses to provide accurate information to their patients.

    228999710K viewsView on X
  • Jun 25, 202618x their median

    The State Department’s plan will basically destroy PEPFAR and lead to the closure of many CDC country offices—a scenario that would jeopardize the health of millions and make Americans less safe. https://t.co/UiLFoOXTg4

    170114527.9K viewsView on X
  • Jun 10, 202615x their median

    Erica Frazier Stum died at 33 of cervical cancer—a disease a vaccine could have prevented. HPV vaccination reduces cervical cancer risk by up to 80%. Australia is on track to eliminate cervical cancer entirely. Yet only 63% of U.S. teens are up to date on the vaccine. Read this powerful piece by @LizSzabo. https://t.co/dvKkWOU3po

    18649368.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 202615x their median

    Although some evidence suggested that getting vaccinated against shingles also lowers your risk of dementia, it wasn’t enough to be a slam dunk. New studies now offer stronger evidence. So how do we adjust our baseline thinking and recommendations when new information arises? https://t.co/Vlr0Ps8Cil

    1744221210K viewsView on X
  • Jun 6, 202614x their median

    Ebola is an unforgiving enemy and requires a massive, immediate, and meticulous response, as I write in @statnews. Contact tracing, quarantine, and rapid isolation control spread. A vaccine and treatment are urgently needed, but we can control the outbreak without them—if the world acts to support communities, health workers, and patients in DRC right now. https://t.co/EPoBYGB3K8

    135681518.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 202613x their median

    A public health system at full strength catches threats when the risk is low and an effective response is easy. A weakened system finds outbreaks late, when they are big and much harder to stop.

    16048349.7K viewsView on X
  • Jun 22, 202610x their median

    Turning CDC into a vendor will destroy lifesaving programs and undermine health security around the world and in our own country. This isn’t global health reform, it’s abandonment. https://t.co/7OjwELAiDu

    10947524.5K viewsView on X
  • Jun 3, 202610x their median

    Ebola has a running head start. By the time the outbreak in DRC was detected, there were already many suspected cases and deaths. We’ve seen that if you reach an Ebola outbreak in days, you can stop it in weeks. Months of delay? It will take much, much longer. That’s why countries need to surge support to affected communities now. https://t.co/jkMXQwZ55w

    1074511010K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 16 interactions against 234K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.1K times each, and 0.306% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 63% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.4K interactions, about 85x its own typical post.

What is Dr. Tom Frieden's engagement rate on X?
Dr. Tom Frieden (@DrTomFrieden) has an engagement rate of 0.007%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 234,236 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.007%, Dr. Tom Frieden sits above the 10th percentile of the 68,879 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DrTomFrieden have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @DrTomFrieden post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going