Back to @DrNaumanNiaz's profile

Dr. Nauman Niaz engagement report

@DrNaumanNiaz - 405K followers on X

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.034%
of 405K followers
Per impression
1.27%
11K views on a typical post
Reach
2.69%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
138
interactions (median)
Saved
0.028%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.93/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 138 interactions against 405K followers, an engagement rate of 0.034%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 1.27% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.70% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 31% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.4K interactions, about 18x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cricket, #ppp, #pti.

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026. Recurring tags: #cricket, #ppp, #pti.

Compared with accounts its own size

Dr. Nauman Niaz's engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 54% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.034%, Dr. Nauman Niaz sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video25% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link31% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 25% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 31% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 898 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 31, 202618x their median

    وہاب ریاض ہر آفس میں ناکام ہوا اس کے باوجود اس کی سیلری بھی بڑھتی رہی اور اسے نیا آفس بھی ملتا رہا ! ڈاکٹر نعمان نیاز ۔۔۔ https://t.co/zq1s0vHdtj

    1.9K513131041K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20266.4x their median

    May be Stuart Broad was right when he expressed ‘Pakistan is a poor team & England should win 3-0’. They can’t play pace, they can’t bat against seam & swing & are suspect against quality spin. Such a sad sight.

    7795844517K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20265.4x their median

    Well played Abdullah Shafiq, attractive, disciplined, & capitalizing an unexpected opportunity. Well done Abdullah.

    711239213K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20264.7x their median

    What could be the reason to release Ali Usman?

    483231251223K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20264.6x their median

    Raza equals world record of Tim Southee hitting 9 sixes on Test debut & the highest individual score of 81 beating that’s Milan Rathnayake's 72 for Sri Lanka against England at Manchester in August 2024, breaking Balwinder Sandhu's 71 from 1983.

    6002811012K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20264.1x their median

    Babar once again fell short. The batsmanship was of the highest order, pure class throughout, and yet the long-awaited hundred continued to elude him. There was, unmistakably, something altered about him: the stroke play, the deft and unhurried driving, were a manifestations in themselves. One is left to wonder whether the impediment is a mental one. Whatever the cause, he remains a batsman of genuine refinement, plainly a cut above his contemporaries, even if his returns over the past three years scarcely vindicate the reputation he has come to enjoy.

    5242021020K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20263.2x their median

    It’s embarrassing. Let’s see now what numbers or reasons Mike Hesson comes up with. And how Aaqib Javed shall defend this all. Not a Test, it seems a school team being bullied by ‘big boys’ of the street. Just remember in the last 05 innings Pakistan hasn’t been able to post a total of 200 or above?

    3525632616K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20262.8x their median

    Our ex cricketers presently running the Pakistan team think the world rotates around them, and they have presumably start to believe in their own egos….

    3294418213K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.8x their median

    We kept on crying about our bowling? What about our elite batsmen? The test weather permitting is over in day and a half. Rest is just a formality?

    3382616211K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20262.7x their median

    This is indeed a sign of worry. Out batters would have to override these stats. (Data courtesy @KamranMuzaffer via @iRashidLatif68 ) https://t.co/xRwJwDnZvb

    3271924929K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#cricket#ppp#pti#arynews#cricketanalysis

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 138 interactions against 405K followers, an engagement rate of 0.034%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 1.27% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.70% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 31% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.4K interactions, about 18x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cricket, #ppp, #pti.

What is Dr. Nauman Niaz's engagement rate on X?
Dr. Nauman Niaz (@DrNaumanNiaz) has an engagement rate of 0.034%, based on the median interactions across 32 original posts from the last 30 days against 404,730 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.034%, Dr. Nauman Niaz sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DrNaumanNiaz have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @DrNaumanNiaz post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going