Dr. Nauman Niaz engagement report
@DrNaumanNiaz - 405K followers on X
Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 122 interactions against 405K followers, an engagement rate of 0.03%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 33% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 1.21% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.49% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 11% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 34% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 888 interactions, about 7.3x its own typical post.
Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Dr. Nauman Niaz's engagement rate beats 33% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 47% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.03%, Dr. Nauman Niaz sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.081% |
| 75th percentile | 0.439% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 158.1% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 52K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 51K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 55K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 44K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 43K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 50K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 54K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 62K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 72K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 74K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 81K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 89K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 98K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 101K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 104K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 102K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 94K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 88K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 83K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 77K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 68K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 59K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 237K |
| Monday | 0% | 300K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 299K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 256K |
| Thursday | -1% | 249K |
| Friday | -3% | 258K |
| Saturday | +3% | 232K |
Best tweets
- Aug 19, 20267.3x their median
May be Stuart Broad was right when he expressed ‘Pakistan is a poor team & England should win 3-0’. They can’t play pace, they can’t bat against seam & swing & are suspect against quality spin. Such a sad sight.
- Aug 3, 20266.1x their median
Well played Abdullah Shafiq, attractive, disciplined, & capitalizing an unexpected opportunity. Well done Abdullah.
- Aug 4, 20264.6x their median
Babar once again fell short. The batsmanship was of the highest order, pure class throughout, and yet the long-awaited hundred continued to elude him. There was, unmistakably, something altered about him: the stroke play, the deft and unhurried driving, were a manifestations in themselves. One is left to wonder whether the impediment is a mental one. Whatever the cause, he remains a batsman of genuine refinement, plainly a cut above his contemporaries, even if his returns over the past three years scarcely vindicate the reputation he has come to enjoy.
- Aug 22, 20263.2x their median
Our ex cricketers presently running the Pakistan team think the world rotates around them, and they have presumably start to believe in their own egos….
- Aug 28, 20263.1x their median
We kept on crying about our bowling? What about our elite batsmen? The test weather permitting is over in day and a half. Rest is just a formality?
- Aug 5, 20263.1x their median
This is indeed a sign of worry. Out batters would have to override these stats. (Data courtesy @KamranMuzaffer via @iRashidLatif68 ) https://t.co/xRwJwDnZvb
- Aug 21, 20262.7x their median
Pitiable. And yet we retain the effrontery to admonish the foreign former cricketers who tell the world, however plainly, how far we have fallen. Might an Associate side now be the superior of this Pakistan team? An innings defeat looms with a session and a half still remaining on the third day & this despite almost three full sessions surrendered to rain. As Zimbabwe once did, Pakistan might do well to relinquish their Test status altogether and content themselves with the stewardship of Mike Hesson, Wahab Riaz and the ostensibly most capable Aaqib Javed. They will furnish their justifications, as a few other former players attach themselves to the procession. And so the apathy shall endure. The humiliation likewise. Bizarre @iramizraja @MuhammadWasim77 @KamranMuzaffer @ShahzadIqbalGEO @AbdurRoufKhan6 @iRashidLatif68
- Aug 30, 20262.5x their median
Ironically Imam Ul Haq has been diagnosed Grade I tear of the calf & she’ll be out of action for 10 days. A Grade I calf strain (gastrocnemius/soleus tear) requires the muscle to be loaded and stretched or contracted forcefully. Standing still in the slips, with no sudden movement, is not a plausible mechanism on its own. But slip fielding isn’t purely static. A Grade I tear could occur without any obvious “stretch” if there was: a. A sudden dive, lunge, or push-off to a catch b. An explosive first step to move for the ball c. Rising abruptly from the crouched slip stance d. A quick change of direction or awkward planted-foot movement Any of these can produce the rapid eccentric load that tears a few muscle fibres, even if the fielder felt they were “just standing there” a moment before. Purely standing motionless, weight-bearing but without acceleration or forceful contraction, would not cause it. The injury needs a triggering load, however brief. So the honest answer is: not from standing alone, but yes from the small dynamic movements that slip fielding involves, & those can happen fast enough that the cricketer may not register them as a “stretch. @iRashidLatif68 @MuhammadWasim77 @KamranMuzaffer @ShahzadIqbalGEO
- Aug 17, 20262.3x their median
Who is Pakistan’s vice captain, if Babar fails to regain fitness ahead of the Headingley Test, who’ll stand in for him as captain? Saud, Agha, Rizwan or who?
- Aug 30, 20262.2x their median
Just wild thought? Can Pakistan pull this off?
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 122 interactions against 405K followers, an engagement rate of 0.03%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 33% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 1.21% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.49% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 11% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 34% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 888 interactions, about 7.3x its own typical post.
- What is Dr. Nauman Niaz's engagement rate on X?
- Dr. Nauman Niaz (@DrNaumanNiaz) has an engagement rate of 0.03%, based on the median interactions across 35 original posts from the last 30 days against 405,420 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.03%, Dr. Nauman Niaz sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @DrNaumanNiaz have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 33% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @DrNaumanNiaz post?
- Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.8 posts per day across the measured window.