Dr. Li-Meng YAN engagement report
@DrLiMengYAN1 - 184K followers on X
Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 58 interactions against 184K followers, an engagement rate of 0.031%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.2K times each, and 1.37% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.29% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 11% carry an image or video and 89% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 30K interactions, about 518x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #israel, #jews, #ludemedia.
Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026. Recurring tags: #israel, #jews, #ludemedia.
Compared with accounts its own size
Dr. Li-Meng YAN's engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 52% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.031%, Dr. Li-Meng YAN sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 11% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 89% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 11% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 89% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 162 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 12, 2026518x their median
Mentions of the word "Fauci" on X have fallen off a cliff since the data centres in Russia were hit Makes you wonder... https://t.co/6ooWFcMeKt
- May 6, 202310x their median
中共制作的一个用蚊子运载病毒的动画视频 @LawrenceSellin @Michael_Yon @DrLiMengYAN1 @lude_media https://t.co/gOX2zpyI79
- Feb 13, 20228.0x their median
#每日开智 2/11/2022 反超限战情S1E18 1💥达雷妥尤❗️CD38❗️ 🔸雷冒死递出四个字:达雷妥尤 🔸达雷妥尤只针对CD38靶点 强生公司研发 一般用于治疗恶性骨髓瘤 🔸中共科研文章:西安68个出血热病例 都针对CD38治疗 证明有效 🔸中共破解了达雷妥尤并大量复制 https://t.co/9kiWW4gfbo
- May 9, 20247.2x their median
【路德时评】严重事故!来自“中央军委”的顶级机密报告:新交付到孟加拉59改坦克打靶测试,造成人员伤亡,中孟军方严密封锁消息,牵扯中共对一带一路国家军方大规模腐败;5/8/2024【路德/Mascot】 https://t.co/0d3fbmroYT 孟加拉59改坦克在部队打靶事故简报 2024年5月5日,孟59改专家组接到孟加拉902车间通知,孟加拉七团使用我方交付的59改坦克,在坦克打靶过程中,出现人员事故,其中一台坦克的车长、炮长烧伤以及一名填弹手死亡。专家组立即汇报到相关部门。5月6日,接到孟方通知,专家组和军委代表处会同孟方装甲局人员,乘机前往吉大港事故现场。 一、5月7日,中方现场事故调查组了解和汇报如下情况: 1、 事故车辆编号260198,车辆为近期交付孟方的第四批车辆中的一台(第四批于2024年3-4月,对外共交付30台坦克。车辆完全按照验收技术要求,陆续部队使用,用户之一,孟7团按照原计划,在5月初提走4台新交付的坦克后,立刻到吉大港进行打靶训练)。该车在事故前共射击了60发弹药。 1.1 其中30发弹药为坦克验收时射击(22发穿、7发榴、1发破,全部弹种由我方供应,打靶试验合格)。 1.2 其余30发是5月1日至4日射击,均为穿甲弹。事故弹药是本次射击的第31发穿甲弹,当天射击的第5发。本次射击所有弹药均为巴基斯坦POF生产。生产日期2022年。 2、 事故发生时间为5月4日下午2:40左右,射击前装弹等操作正常。射击使用简易工况模式,手动击发。射击后,火药正常驻退,但复进行程约有152mm未完成,炮栓未打开,弹壳仍留在炮膛内。弹药向前发射约700-800米左右掉落(未能到打靶距离) 3、经现场士兵描述,为观察弹药装填位置,孟方因此在右侧未安装铝合金防护板。另外,射击前未检查火炮初压,末压等。 4、射击后,车长被烧伤,炮长被烧伤,且右脸下巴被栓体挡板飞出击碎,栓体挡板变形;装弹手死亡,被烧伤,左半边头颅被挡板盘飞出击碎。导致栓体挡板及档盘飞出伤人的力的来源,现场无法判断,需相关国内专家分析。 5、现场工作组观察车体内部,基本没有看到火烧伤到坦克内部的痕迹。 6、现场见车辆孟方使用的部分125穿。(孟加拉从巴基斯坦购买,较便宜),除了个别有外部积水情况(5月7日早晨刚下雨)。弹药处于干燥状态。干燥剂,弹药包装等处于完好状态。 二、孟方态度:今天孟方现场开会,装甲局局长一秘G1牵头,7团CO及部分军官,中方工作组和我军方代理在场。会上G1表示,坦克内部应该是个安全的与炮膛隔绝的空间,这种坦克内部出现的伤亡很难接受,并希望中方回答三个问题: 1、 事故发生的原因: 2、事故相关的保护措施在车上是否存在,为何没有作用; 3、复进为什么没有完成。 另外,孟方在整个调查过程中,未对北方公司进行抱怨,他们只是感觉到中方59改车的防护设计,有些单薄,可以无法有效避免恶性事件中的人员伤害。 三、 孟加拉现场的技术小组工作 事故发生的第一时间,军项一部及时汇报公司相关部门,并在第一时间向国内工厂,包括447、803等部门沟通。现场成立中方工作小组,进行现场勘查和记录,情况如下: 1、坦克内部核实,没有发现火烧情况。坦克三防系统未启动,坦克内部清洁。 2、坦克受伤人员情况,只能看到照片。造成人员伤亡的档盘破片和栓体破片,留在现场,并进行拍照。孟方操作人员违反打靶要求,未安装右侧火炮防护板。 3、坦克栓体卡死,目前无法打开,弹药发射的钢底状态无法看到,(此故障现象,孟方在今年2月吉大港日常打靶训练中,使用我方2022年提供的第三批59改坦克打靶中,6台坦克中有2台发生该类故障。击发后栓体卡死。故障坦克在野外无法排出故障,孟方故意将故障坦克送到902车间,请中方专家帮助排除。中方专家组用特制工装等技术措施,也无法打开栓体取出弹底,因此我方特派遣447火炮拆解专家一人,在4月中旬赴孟工作,准备在5月下旬完成炮塔和火炮拆解。2024年3月在卡弹故障发生后,中方专家组已经告知902工厂,故障原因不是坦克问题,而是使用巴基斯坦弹造成的卡弹,并且存在未来的使用风险。中方提醒孟方弹药问题,902工厂也同步电话汇报了装甲局) 4、现场中方工作组在孟方人员的配合下,用现场铁丝测试,基本能发现卡住的钢底,下面出现了破洞,铁丝能轻易穿过。使用的老巴弹的钢底,已经被击穿,出现破洞。 5、孟方已经使用的AP弹药钢底,现场抽样了10套,钢号完全一样,无法区分。中方已要求孟方,将部分未使用的弹药,一起会同前3项内容,进行封存,并送至902工厂,等待中国国内的进一步指示。 四、国内工作组及相关厂家研究结果 经过一天研究,针对孟方提供出的三个问题,国内意见如下: 1、事故发生的原因: 国内专家已初步判断,造成的事故的伤害肯定来自于弹药,并且由于弹的问题,还造成火炮内部严重烧蚀进一步损伤,拟采用下面方法: 1.1 将坦克送到902厂,中孟双方共同开栓,如果不能开栓,必须拆解火炮取出卡住的钢底。然后在无弹药情况下,检查开栓动作是否正常,从而判断火药的性能是否正常。 1.2 观察卡住的钢底,判断弹壳的状态,包括裂缝及变形等。(根据现场跑尾喷射气流的位置判断,应该是弹壳钢底的右上方及右下方都有裂缝击穿,具体要打开栓体后观察钢底情况。 1.3 钢底被击穿,属于严重弹药事故问题,建议外方立刻停止该批弹药的使用。 2、事故相关的保护措施在车上是否存在,为何没有作用。 坦克厂为了安全原因,特意有火炮防危板设计,包括左侧安装有护闩板,右侧安装有护闩盖。 但防危板的设计,无法对严重的弹药事故起到全部保护作用,左防护板已经在恶性事故中起到保护车长和炮长的一些作用,但装弹手为观察弹药装填位置,将右侧铝板-护栓板拆除,最终造成恶性事故。 3、复进为什么没有完成 复进不到位问题,火炮发射过程中的机构动作 炮弹入膛关闩后,点燃底火,膛内产生高压,高温气体推动弹完向前运动。后坐部分向后运动,后坐到位时依靠复进机储存的能量推动后坐部分向前运动。复进运动过程中,通过半自动机将炮闩打开,抽出药筒,同时抽筒子挂住闩体。 根据现场实测复进未到位距离为152mm,经分析,该位置为开闩起始位置,符合火炮正常工作状态。现场炮闩未打开,弹壳留膛,复进不到位,与复进开闩受到阻力有关,阻力来源于弹壳对闩体和跑尾的挤压。 五、北方公司国内处理情况汇报 1、北方公司地区部、质量部、代表处、军项一部和相关工厂,成立了事故调查小组。 2、中方现场工作小组,已经协调孟方,将事故涉及到的坦克、弹药等物资进行必要封存,并送902工厂。 3、中方专家将安排现场中方人员或国内人员,进行事故火炮相关的技术鉴定,同时准备相关弹药厂,钢底厂的技术人员出国手续,需要时给予孟方一定技术支持。 4、中方建议孟方,暂停该弹药的使用,防止出现下一次伤害,并且孟方应该尽快要求弹药供应商POF,到现场进行弹药的鉴定和处理工作。在国内给外方人员出具书面意见之前,建议代表处尽快将事故原因、国内措施,告知孟方。 2024年5月7日 国防工业科技局调查小组
- Sep 11, 20262.3x their median
【2026年9月10日 “路德社-闫博士说”直播】 美俄“驱猎”见效,习不得不窜访印度!青岛船厂大火,孟加拉T-59改坦克再炸膛! https://t.co/qsRnpSwvDr
- Sep 11, 20262.0x their median
【2026年9月9日 “路德社-闫博士说”直播】 Putin喊Trump一起见习,习的小伙伴越来越靠不住了!中共在马达加斯加发展电诈供应链,被美查封5200万美元 https://t.co/8pA85NGSGx
- Sep 9, 20261.8x their median
【2026年9月8日 “路德社-闫博士说”直播】 共慌了!“经济D-Day”迫使习致电英首相,求保障投资安全!“纽约时报”帮中共争夺秘鲁,可惜没用! https://t.co/ql5g26QWhH
- Oct 9, 20261.8x their median
【2026年10月8日 “路德社-闫博士说”直播】 美国会紧盯F-35零件流入中国案!俄“鼠疫”死者母亲否认“实验室打碎试管”说;马杜罗夫妇被追加“酷刑”指控! https://t.co/5S0CY4uIUM
- Oct 8, 20261.7x their median
【2026年10月7日 “路德社-闫博士说”直播】 FBI破获ISIS购物中心恐袭案;俄“鼠疫”让全球重审“中俄生物武器”,中共打算让妇联书记当WHO总干事 https://t.co/Tl8GaRZ1VW
- Sep 9, 20261.6x their median
【路德社】中共突然动用财政部和中烟真金白银注资八大金融央企直接补核心一级资本,不是降准更不是MLF!美金融战围剿中共影子金融网络损失惨重已打到中资银行资产负债表!9/9/2026 Candy https://t.co/nqE3GR8GRl 来自 @YouTube
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 58 interactions against 184K followers, an engagement rate of 0.031%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.2K times each, and 1.37% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.29% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 11% carry an image or video and 89% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 30K interactions, about 518x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #israel, #jews, #ludemedia.
- What is Dr. Li-Meng YAN's engagement rate on X?
- Dr. Li-Meng YAN (@DrLiMengYAN1) has an engagement rate of 0.031%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 183,819 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.031%, Dr. Li-Meng YAN sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @DrLiMengYAN1 have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @DrLiMengYAN1 post?
- Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.57 posts per day across the measured window.