Back to @DrEliDavid's profile

Dr. Eli David engagement report

@DrEliDavid - 855K followers on X

Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.08%
of 855K followers
Per impression
2.19%
31K views on a typical post
Reach
3.66%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
686
interactions (median)
Saved
0.029%
9 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.87/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 686 interactions against 855K followers, an engagement rate of 0.08%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 3,809 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 31K times each, and 2.19% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.66% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 69% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 74K interactions, about 109x its own typical post.

Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026. Recurring tag: #ื”ื‘ื•ืงืจื”ื–ื”.

Compared with accounts its own size

Dr. Eli David's engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,809 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 72% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.08%, Dr. Eli David sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.435%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,852 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,564 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 30, 2026109x their median

    ๐Ÿšจ Anthony Fauci literally wrote in his diary Covid was only a 0.2% fatality rate Anthony Fauci is confronted over writing in his diary that Covid 19 was essentially just the flu but then and locked down for a global pandemic and mandated vaccines โ€œDr. Fauci, you admitted in your own diary that COVID was nothing more than a flu โ€” Are you ever going to admit that you killed millions of people through your poison shots? โ€” When are you going to take responsibility for your mishandling of COVID Dr. Fauci?โ€œ Here is exactly what was written in Anthony Fauciโ€™s diary โ€œacting like a bad influenza in its transmissibilityโ€ โ€œand that the case fatality rate was โ€œmore like 0.2-0.3% rather than 2.0%.โ€ Itโ€™s time to arrest Anthony Fauci for crimes against humanity He literally wrote that Covid only had a 0.2% fatally rate and then tried everything possible to force everyone to get these experimental dangerous vaccines

    52K20K1.3K9101.9M viewsView on X
  • Nov 26, 202347x their median

    Most influential "Founders" on ๐• ๐Ÿ‘‡ Nice to be above OpenAI's Sam Altman, but who's that guy above me? ๐Ÿคฃ https://t.co/sQhdqnBmm1

    21K2.2K8.1K30814M viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20266.9x their median

    ื‘ื“ืจืš ื›ืœืœ ื”ืฆื™ื‘ื•ืจ ื”ื™ืฉืจืืœื™ ืœื ืžื‘ื™ืŸ ื›ืžื” ื”ื•ื ื ืคื’ืข ืžืฉื™ืจื•ืช ืฆื™ื‘ื•ืจื™ ื’ืจื•ืข, ื”ื™ื•ื ื”ื•ื ืžืงื‘ืœ ื“ื•ื’ืžื” ืœื›ืš, ื•ืžืฉืœื ืืช ื”ืžื—ื™ืจ ืฉืœ ืžืฉืจื“ ื‘ืชื”ืœื™ื›ื™ ืงืจื™ืกื” ืžืจื•ื‘ ืžื™ื ื•ื™ื™ื ืคื•ืœื™ื˜ื™ื™ื ื•ื ื™ื”ื•ืœ ื›ื•ืฉืœ. ื›ืœ ืžื™ ืฉืชืงื•ืข ื›ืจื’ืข ื‘ื ืชื‘ืดื’, ืื• ื‘ืคืงืงื™ื, ืื• ืžื—ื›ื” ืฉืขื•ืช ืœืื•ื˜ื•ื‘ื•ืก ืฉืœื ืžื’ื™ืข - ื—ืฉื•ื‘ ืœื™ ืฉืชื“ืขื• ืฉื”ืžืฆื‘ ืœื ื—ื™ื™ื‘ ืœื”ื™ื•ืช ื›ื›ื”. ื”ืจื’ื™ืœื• ืื•ืชื ื• ืœืžืžืฉืœื” ืฉืžื ืจืžืœืช ืฉืื™ ืืคืฉืจ ืœืคืชื•ืจ ื›ืœื•ื, ืื‘ืœ ื‘ืงืจื•ื‘ ื–ื” ื™ื”ื™ื” ืื—ืจืช. ื‘ืงืจื•ื‘ ืฉื™ื˜ืช ืดื”ื™ื”ืœื•ืžื™ืืด ืชืขื‘ื•ืจ ืžื”ืขื•ืœื, ื•ื”ื ื”ืœืช ืžืฉืจื“ ื”ืชื—ื‘ื•ืจื” ืœื ืชืฆื ื™ื—ื“ ืœืดื—ื•ืคืฉื” ืคืจื˜ื™ืชืด ื‘ืžืจื•ืงื• ืœืฉื‘ื•ืข ื‘ืกื•ืฃ ืื•ื’ืกื˜. ื‘ืงืจื•ื‘ ื ืงื™ื ืžืžืฉืœื” ืฉืขื•ื‘ื“ืช ืขื‘ื•ืจ ื”ืื–ืจื—ื™ื ื•ื‘ื™ื—ื“ ื ืชืงืŸ ืืช ืžื“ื™ื ืช ื™ืฉืจืืœ.

    4.0K43321635220K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20265.3x their median

    Bajar el gasto pรบblico es la รบnica manera sustentable de bajar la carga impositiva y remover ese yunque q aprieta los salarios de los argentinos. Serรญa genial q las provincias hagan lo mismo: menos gasto y menos impuestos. Ya vendrรก. Gracias @JMilei por marcar el rumbo. VLLC! https://t.co/45e9wCf8KF

    2.8K52024861111K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20264.6x their median

    Why is the U.S. Ambassador to Turkey Tom Barrack advocating directly against the policy of the United States and the policy of the president whom he serves? This guy needs to be fired immediately https://t.co/UPaM9qxfmA

    2.4K4352864548K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20264.5x their median

    ืกื™ืงืจืŸ ืื•ืชื™ ืžื™ ื–ื” ื”ื‘ื—ื•ืจ ื”ื–ื” ื•ื—ืฉื‘ืชื™ ืฉื›ื‘ืจ ืฉืžืขืชื™ ื”ื›ืœ ื‘ืžื“ื™ื ื” ื”ื–ื• ื•ืื•ืœื™ ืจืง ืื ื™ ื—ื™ ื‘ืœื”ืœื”ืœื ื“ ืื‘ืœ ืžื•ื“ื” ืฉื—ืœืง ืžื”ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืคื” ืงืจืืชื™ ืงื•ื“ื ืคืขื•ืจ ืคื”. ืคื ื—ืก ืขื™ื“ืŸ 40 ืฉื ื” ื™ื•"ืจ ื•ืขื“! ื›ืฉืœื ื‘ืจื•ืจ ืื ื–ื” ื•ืขื“ ืขื•ื‘ื“ื™ื ืื• ืืจื•ื—ืช ืฉื™ืฉื™ ืฉืœ ื”ืžืฉืคื—ื”. 1. ืคื ื—ืก ื”ืชื—ื™ืœ ืœืขื‘ื•ื“ ื‘ืจืฉื•ืช ื‘-1979 ื›ื ื˜ืœ (ืกื•ื’ ืฉืœ ืกื‘ืœ) ื•ื ื”ื’, ื‘ืขืงื‘ื•ืช ืฉื ื™ ืื—ื™ื ืฉื›ื‘ืจ ืขื‘ื“ื• ืฉื! 3 ืฉื ื™ื ืœืื—ืจ ืžื›ืŸ ื ื‘ื—ืจ ืœื•ืขื“ ื•ืž-1986 ื”ื•ื ื™ื•"ืจ ื•ืขื“ ื”ืขื•ื‘ื“ื™ื - 40 ืฉื ื” ืขื“ ื›ื”. ื™ืฉ ืขื•ื‘ื“ื™ื ื‘ื ืชื‘"ื’ ืฉื ื•ืœื“ื•, ื”ืชื’ื™ื™ืกื•, ื”ืฉืชื—ืจืจื• ื•ื”ืชืงื‘ืœื• ืœืขื‘ื•ื“ื” ื•ื›ืš ื’ื ื™ืœื“ื™ื”ื - ื•ื”ื•ื ืขื“ื™ื™ืŸ ื”ื™ื•"ืจ ืฉืœื”ื. 2. ืžื™ ืกื’ืŸ ื™ื•"ืจ ื”ื•ื•ืขื“? ืื— ืฉืœื• ืžืจื“ื›ื™ (ื‘ืืžื ืฉืœื™). ื‘ื•ื•ืขื“ ื™ื•ืฉื‘ื™ื ื’ื ืฉื ื™ ืื—ื™ื™ื ื™ื ืฉืœื• - ื™ื•ืกื™ ื•ืฉืจื•ืŸ - ืœื ืžืฉื”ื• ื—ืจื™ื’. ื•ื›ืžื•ื‘ืŸ ืขืฉืจื•ืช ื‘ื ื™ ืžืฉืคื—ื” ืžื•ืขืกืงื™ื ื‘ืจืฉื•ืช: ื™ืœื“ื™ื, ื‘ื ื™ ื–ื•ื’, ืื—ื™ื ื•ืื—ื™ื™ื ื™ื. ื—ืœืงื ื‘ืชืคืงื™ื“ื™ื ื‘ื›ื™ืจื™ื, ื•ื—ืœืงื ืžื ื”ืœื™ื ืื—ื“ ืืช ื”ืฉื ื™ ื‘ืื•ืชื ืื’ืคื™ื. ืื’ื‘, ืขื•ื“ ื‘ืฉื ืช 2000 ืžืฆื ืžื‘ืงืจ ื”ืจืฉื•ืช ืฉื—ืœืง ืžื‘ื ื™ ื”ืžืฉืคื—ื” ื‘ื›ืœืœ ืœื ื“ื™ื•ื•ื—ื• ืขืœ ื”ืงืจื‘ื” ื›ืฉื”ืชืงื‘ืœื• ืœืขื‘ื•ื“ื” - ืื‘ืœ ืฉื˜ื•ื™ื•ืช ืขืœ ื”ื–ื™ืŸ ืฉืœื”ื. 3. ืื ื›ืœ ื–ื” ืžืกืคื™ืง, ืขืœ ืคื™ ื›ืœ ืžื™ื ื™ ืคืจืกื•ืžื™ื, ืขื™ื“ืŸ ืžื™ื™ืขื“ ืืช ื‘ื ื• ื ืื•ืจ ืœื”ื—ืœื™ืฃ ืื•ืชื• ื›ื™ื•"ืจ ื”ื•ื•ืขื“. ืฉืžืขืชื™ ืฉืงื™ื ื’ืณื•ื ื’ ืื•ืŸ ืฉืžืข ืืช ื–ื” ื•ืืžืจ ืดื”ื’ื–ืžืช ืื— ื™ืงืจืด. 4. ื•ืขื›ืฉื™ื• ืœืงื˜ืข ืฉืœื ืชืืžื™ื ื•: ืœืคื ื™ 8 ืฉื ื™ื *ื‘ื™ืงืฉ* ื”ืื•ืฆืจ ืžื”ืจืฉื•ืช ืœื”ืขื‘ื™ืจ ืœืžื“ื™ื ื” 1.2 ืžื™ืœื™ืืจื“ ืฉืงืœ ืฉื”ืฆื˜ื‘ืจื• ื‘ืงื•ืคืชื” ืžืื’ืจื•ืช. ืชื–ื›ื•ืจืช ืงื˜ื ื” - ื”ืจืฉื•ืช ืฉื™ื™ื›ืช ืœืžื“ื™ื ื”. ื‘ืจืฉื•ืช ืœื ืื”ื‘ื• ืฉื ื›ื ืกื™ื ืœื”ื ืœื—ืฉื‘ื•ืŸ ื›ืื™ืœื• ื–ื” ื›ืกืฃ ืฉืœ ืชื•ืฉื‘ื™ ื”ืžื“ื™ื ื” ืื• ืžืฉื”ื•. ืื– ืื™ืš ื‘ืกื•ืฃ ื”ืžื“ื™ื ื” ืงื™ื‘ืœื” ืืช ื”ื›ืกืฃ? ื ื—ืชื ื”ืกื›ื ืฉืœืคื™ื• ื›ืœ ืขื•ื‘ื“ ืงื‘ื•ืข ืงื™ื‘ืœ ืžืขื ืง ื—ื“ ืคืขืžื™ ืฉืœ ื›-20 ืืœืฃ ืฉืงืœ!, ืชืžื•ืจืช "ื”ืกื›ืžืช ื”ืขื•ื‘ื“ื™ื" ืœื”ืขื‘ืจื”. ื›ืœื•ืžืจ: ื”ืžื“ื™ื ื” ืฉื™ืœืžื” ื›ื•ืคืจ ื›ื“ื™ ืœืงื‘ืœ ืืช ื”ื›ืกืฃ ืฉืœ ืขืฆืžื” - ื•ืื—ืจื™ ื–ื” ื ื•ืคืœื™ื ืขืœ ื’ืณืจื•ืฉื™. 5. ืื”, ื‘ื™ืŸ ืœื‘ื™ืŸ ื›ื ืจืื” ืจืฆื” ืœื”ืจื—ื™ื‘ ืืช ื”ืื™ืžืคืจื™ื” ื•ื‘-1998 ืฉื›ืจ ื“ื™ืจื” ื‘ืœื•ื“, ื”ืชืžื•ื“ื“ ื‘ื‘ื—ื™ืจื•ืช ื•ื ื‘ื—ืจ ืœืจืืฉื•ืช ืขื™ืจื™ื™ืช ืœื•ื“! ืื—ืจื™ ืฉื ืชื™ื™ื ืคื™ื–ืจ ืฉืจ ื”ืคื ื™ื ืืช ื”ืขื™ืจื™ื™ื” ื•ื”ืงื™ื ื•ืขื“ื” ืงืจื•ืื” - ืขืงื‘ ื‘ืœืื’ืŸ ืฉืฉืจืจ ื‘ืขื™ืจ ื•ื‘ืขื™ืจื™ื™ื”, ื’ื™ืจืขื•ืŸ ื—ืžื•ืจ, ืกืžื™ื, ื‘ื ื™ื™ื” ืœื ื—ื•ืงื™ืช ื•ืขื•ื“, ืื– ืขื™ื“ืŸ ืคืฉื•ื˜ ื—ื–ืจ ืœื•ื•ืขื“, ื›ืื™ืœื• ืœื ืงืจื” ื›ืœื•ื. ืงื™ืฆืจ ื‘ืฉืœื‘ ื”ื–ื” ืื ื—ื ื• ื’ืžื•ืจื™ื ืขื ื”ืจืฉื•ืช ื”ื–ื• ื•ื’ื ืœื ืžื›ื‘ื“, ื›ื™ ื‘ืืจื•ื—ืช ืฉื™ืฉื™, ืืฃ ืื—ื“ ืœื ืžื–ื™ื– ืืช ืื‘ื ืžืจืืฉ ื”ืฉื•ืœื—ืŸ

    2.6K27313038140K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20264.1x their median

    ๐Ÿšจ Breaking: Israel's Defense Minister @Israel_katz in a harsh condemnation of US Ambassador To Turkey: โ€œThe statements of Tom Barrack directly contradict the policies of President Trumpโ€ https://t.co/7KHZqG6Sst

    2.3K3831281729K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20264.0x their median

    Tom Barrack is supposed to represent the interests of the United States, yet he sounds more like Turkeyโ€™s advocate than an American diplomat. His constant praise of Ankara, his push to bring Turkey back into the F-35 program, and his willingness to bend over backward to accommodate ErdoฤŸan are deeply concerning. America needs diplomats who put American interests first, not people who seem more invested in protecting Turkeyโ€™s interests and now Syria too. If Barrack likes Turkey that much, perhaps he should stay there permanently.

    1.9K4313644435K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20263.9x their median

    Someone please let Tom Barrack know that he is the US Ambassador to Turkey, not the Turkey Ambassador to the US.

    2.3K253122727K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20263.3x their median

    Tom Barrack claims Golan Heights is Syrian territory and is "occupied" by Israel ๐Ÿ‘‡ Didn't he get the memo that Trump recognized Israeli sovereignty over Golan Heights in 2019? What an absolute retard ๐Ÿคฏ P.S. Never trust anyone who's called "Barrack", whether Obama or Tom. https://t.co/kAzmRA8ZQd

    1.8K2951332247K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ื”ื‘ื•ืงืจื”ื–ื”

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 686 interactions against 855K followers, an engagement rate of 0.08%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 3,809 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 31K times each, and 2.19% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.66% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 69% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 74K interactions, about 109x its own typical post.

What is Dr. Eli David's engagement rate on X?
Dr. Eli David (@DrEliDavid) has an engagement rate of 0.08%, based on the median interactions across 42 original posts from the last 30 days against 854,509 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.08%, Dr. Eli David sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DrEliDavid have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,809 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @DrEliDavid post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going