Dr. Danish (official) engagement report
@DrDanish5 - 350K followers on X
Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 14 interactions against 350K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 17% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.3K times each, and 1.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.37% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 78% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.7K interactions, about 192x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #audit, #executive, #pims.
Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026. Recurring tags: #audit, #executive, #pims.
Compared with accounts its own size
Dr. Danish (official)'s engagement rate beats 17% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 49% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.004%, Dr. Danish (official) sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.016% |
| 50th percentile | 0.1% |
| 75th percentile | 0.499% |
| 90th percentile | 2.09% |
| 99th percentile | 119.6% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 78% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 13% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 78% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 363 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Feb 7, 2021192x their median
سر کریک پہ کس طرح ہمارےفوجی جوان اپنےملک کی حفاظت کےلیےجان کی بازی لگائےہوئےہیں دیکھیے👇 https://t.co/J6TTvJkBtN
- Aug 28, 20268.5x their median
یہ کوئی حادثہ یا سانحہ نہیں 14 نومولود بچوں کا قتل ہے FIR قتل کی درج ہونی چاہیے اس پہ جوڈیشل انکوائری کی ضرورت ہے https://t.co/3xJ8280JWb
- Aug 29, 20263.4x their median
کہا جارہا ہے کہ دنیا بھر میں سانحہ ہوتے ہیں لیکن دنیا بھر میں سانحہ کے بعد احتساب بھی ہوتا ہے استفی بھی آتے ہیں اور ذمداروں کو سزا بھی ملتی ہے 👇 https://t.co/jy3Qw6cria
- Aug 24, 20263.3x their median
اگر 8ویں ترمیم تبدیل ہوسکتی ہے تو 18ویں ترمیم میں تبدیلی کیوں نہیں ہوسکتی ؟ صوبے بنانے کا اختیار اب صوبے کے بجائے پارلیمنٹ کرے گی ؟ https://t.co/ZMIV9gjyHk
- Aug 20, 20262.6x their median
نوازشریف کو کب کب کن کن کیسسز میں کیا کیا ریلف ملا انکو بیل ملی ، گرفتار نہیں کیا گیا ، سزا ختم ہوئی ، جلاوطنی کی اجازت ملی۔ میڈیکل گراؤنڈ پہ اسپتال ، گھر۔ اور لندن تک جانے کا موقعہ ملا 👇 https://t.co/sWpoH5Ju4q
- Aug 15, 20262.5x their median
اگر ملک سے محبت ہے اور پاکستان کو ترقی کی طرف کامزن کرنا ہے اور اپنے مفادات کو چھوڑ کر ملکی مفاد کی طرف جانا ہے تو انا اکڑ گھمنڈ ضد کو چھوڑ کر ان تین باتوں پہ عمل کرنا ہے چاہے اسکے لیے 5000افراد کو لٹکانا پڑے ؟ اسکے بغیر ان ہی چہروں کے ساتھ کچھ بھی کرلیں ملک پستی میں گرتا ہی رہے گا اور عوام مہنگائی ، بیرزگاری اور غربت سے مرتی ہی رہے گی ! انسان عقلمند ہوسکتا ہے عقلِ کُل نہیں ! 👇
- Aug 29, 20262.1x their median
Demand for a High-Level #Audit of the Use of Billions of Rupees in #PIMS Funds Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS), Islamabad, is one of the country’s major public teaching and healthcare institutions, where thousands of patients seek treatment every day. According to available information, #PIMS received approximately Rs. 22 billion in funding from the federal government over the past three years, in addition to revenue and funds received from other sources. Against this backdrop, it is a matter of serious public interest that, despite such substantial funding, there are persistent complaints regarding the availability of medical facilities, medicines, equipment, machinery, and other essential services at the hospital. Therefore, a high-level, transparent and independent #forensic audit of the use of these funds should be conducted. In particular, the following matters should be thoroughly investigated: Complete details of all grants and funds provided to PIMS by the federal government during the past three years. Details of the approved budget, funds released, and actual expenditure for each financial year. Complete records of procurement of medicines, medical equipment, machinery, repairs, construction, and other items. Audit of all major tenders, contracts, suppliers, and payments. Examination of expenditure incurred on the purchase, repair, and maintenance of faulty or non-functional medical equipment. Investigation into the reported shortage of medicines and the system for procurement and distribution of medicines. A complete account of PIMS’s own revenue and funds received from other sources. If evidence of financial irregularities, negligence, misuse of authority, or loss to the public exchequer is found at any stage, action should be taken against those responsible in accordance with the law. Since the #Executive Director is the key administrative head of the hospital, the role of #Dr. Rana Imran Sikandar, along with all current or former officers and officials responsible for financial or administrative decisions during the relevant period, should also be examined as part of an impartial investigation. This money does not belong to any individual or institution; it is the taxpayers’ money. Therefore, the public has the right to know where billions of rupees were spent, under which heads, what outcomes were achieved from this expenditure, and who should be held responsible if any irregularities are found. The Government, Ministry of Health, Auditor General of Pakistan, and relevant investigative authorities are urged to conduct an independent, comprehensive and forensic audit of PIMS’s financial and administrative affairs for the past three years and make the findings public. The public deserves an account of how its tax money has been spent. @CMShehbaz @PresOfPakistan @OfficialDGISPR
- Sep 2, 20261.8x their median
حکومت کی معاشی پالیسی اور انکی کاردگی کے بدولت ملک میں غریبوں کے بےپناہ اضافے کے ساتھ ساتھ۔ بھکاریوں۔ چوروں۔ ڈاکوں۔لٹیروں سمیت دہشتگردوں میں بھی کافی اضافہ ہوچکا ہے 👇 https://t.co/UocOVSejc5
- Aug 29, 20261.7x their median
چودہ نومولود بچوں کے قاتلوں کو عبرت کا نشان بنایا جائے سب سے پہلے پمز کے Executive Director کو نوکری سے ہٹایا جائے اور جوڈیشل انکوئیری کرائی جائے !👇 https://t.co/gdTMLq9GCW
- Aug 27, 20261.7x their median
تعجب ہے کہ اتنے سنگین سانحے کے باوجود اب تک PIMS کے Executive Director کو عہدے سے نہیں ہٹایا گیا۔ کسی بھی ادارے میں سربراہ انتظامی ذمہ داری کا سب سے بڑا جواب دہ ہوتا ہے۔ جب تک وہ عہدے پر موجود ہیں، شفاف اور غیرجانبدار انکوائری پر سوالات اٹھتے رہیں گے۔ معلوم ہوا ہے کہ ان اہم عہدوں پر اہلیت کے بجائے سفارشی لوگوں کو تعینات کیا گیا، اور آج اسی ناقص نظام کا یہ افسوسناک نتیجہ ہمارے سامنے ہے۔ ذمہ داری طے ہونی چاہیے، عہدے نہیں بچنے چاہئیں !
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 14 interactions against 350K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 17% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.3K times each, and 1.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.37% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 78% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.7K interactions, about 192x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #audit, #executive, #pims.
- What is Dr. Danish (official)'s engagement rate on X?
- Dr. Danish (official) (@DrDanish5) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 350,200 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.004%, Dr. Danish (official) sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @DrDanish5 have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 17% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @DrDanish5 post?
- Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.