Back to @DonAlt's profile

DonAlt engagement report

@DonAlt - 795K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.281%
of 795K followers
Per impression
1.82%
123K views on a typical post
Reach
15.5%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.032%
40 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.83/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 2.2K interactions against 795K followers, an engagement rate of 0.281%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 123K times each, and 1.82% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 15.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video and 10% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.3K interactions, about 3.7x its own typical post.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

DonAlt's engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 67% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.281%, DonAlt sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.439%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99158.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,409 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-4%101K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-3%102K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-2%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%237K
Monday0%300K
Tuesday-3%299K
Wednesday-1%256K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%258K
Saturday+3%232K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 7, 20263.7x their median

    JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Trump Media terminates planned crypto deals with Crypto․com

    6.9K6305751931.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20261.8x their median

    $BTC This looks like it wants to explode Tiny push and this garbage resistance finally goes and we teleport to the next one https://t.co/1zX6twh27p

    3.4K25326155744K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20261.7x their median

    You all are so gay You're not even short but cheering for down The only reason you're doing so is because you recently sold for a loss and you don't want a market rally to make you look dumb Newsflash, you're retarded accept it and move on You'll make much more money that way

    3.3K13817439651K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20261.5x their median

    It's not even pulling back when it has every reason to Send it https://t.co/lYjRXhlkTv

    3.1K12613113261K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    Target for ETH is $4k If we're strong there $10k If we're not $4k it is I'll probably sell halfway into the rally as usual, you guys will call me washed and rinse repeat Nothing ever changes

    3.1K921027168K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 2026

    Imagine this is actually the bottom and BTC goes to $500k And instead of buying the bottom CT was busy chasing the latest influencer pump and dump Might work out for some, won't work for the majority We'd all be better off without these distractions

    2.9K13520016185K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    When you zoom out a little bit it doesn't even look like BTC just went through a bear market A modest pullback at best https://t.co/2XQyD8PmfT

    2.9K10421916177K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026

    If BTC goes up a bit more you'll start seeing Saylor rebuy what he sold at the bottom Watch

    2.9K7114512117K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026

    Can't believe ETH has been trading like a piece of shit for years until one day after I bought it And then it just goes up in a vertical line Thank you Vitalik

    2.9K55886149K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 2026

    >Market pulls back to $76k >"I just need a pullback to $74k so I can buy before it goes to $100k" >Never hits, miss entry by a couple % I never understand why people that think the market will go up a lot always hope for deep pullbacks The reason you think the market will go up is because it is strong, why are you then in turn hoping for it to show weakness before you buy it? Instead you should hope it locks people out by not giving pullbacks to bid, which in turn will provide buying pressure into much higher levels

    2.7K15117618204K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.2K interactions against 795K followers, an engagement rate of 0.281%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 123K times each, and 1.82% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 15.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video and 10% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.3K interactions, about 3.7x its own typical post.

What is DonAlt's engagement rate on X?
DonAlt (@DonAlt) has an engagement rate of 0.281%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 794,638 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.281%, DonAlt sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DonAlt have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @DonAlt post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going