Back to @DonAlt's profile

DonAlt engagement report

@DonAlt - 798K followers on X

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.33%
of 798K followers
Per impression
1.81%
145K views on a typical post
Reach
18.2%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.6K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.035%
51 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.23/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 2.6K interactions against 798K followers, an engagement rate of 0.33%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 145K times each, and 1.81% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 18.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 24% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.3K interactions, about 3.1x its own typical post.

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

DonAlt's engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 64% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.33%, DonAlt sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video24% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 24% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 162 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 7, 20263.1x their median

    JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Trump Media terminates planned crypto deals with Crypto․com

    6.9K6285721941.7M viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20262.2x their median

    If I'm right and we'll head into the next stage of the bull market soon-ish We'll have one big price event where most things reprice all at once That'll be the sign for most sidelined people that we are indeed in a bull market Which is as usual late but that's just how it goes

    5.2K28018945652K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20261.7x their median

    Crypto mooning as Trump's chances and approval fall to new lows We never needed a crypto president, especially not one that rugs the community over and over again What we need is scammers going to jail while builders are allowed to build Everything else we can do ourselves

    4.2K22814615131K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20261.6x their median

    Crypto is a miserable market 90% of the time And it's absolutely godlike 10% of the time Knowing this why the fuck are so many of you trying so hard to be miserable 100% of the time Just enjoy when this shit pumps It won't be good forever It's simply a brief window of bliss

    3.7K17015116171K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20261.5x their median

    $BTC This looks like it wants to explode Tiny push and this garbage resistance finally goes and we teleport to the next one https://t.co/1zX6twh27p

    3.5K24226357946K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20261.5x their median

    Think you guys underestimate how much Trump has tanked the economy He loses big time in the midterms and his tariffs / war in Iran gets rolled back and everything full sends Inflation gonna resolve itself the moment he's gone too IMO Just a couple more months 🙏

    3.6K11831818235K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 2026

    People are looking for excuses to sell non stop Brothers, have some faith for once You're in this industry for it's upside Why are you acting like such pussies then when it goes up Plenty of room for being a beartard when things turn bearish Until then grow a spine

    3.5K25214638197K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 2026

    BTC is finally at the only resistance I deem serious enough to prevent a new ATH Am I changing my positioning? No Am I taking profits? No Am I a retard? Yes I've been calling bears retards since 60k, I think here you can at least make a compelling case I just don't wanna

    3.5K12012917272K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 2026

    You all are so gay You're not even short but cheering for down The only reason you're doing so is because you recently sold for a loss and you don't want a market rally to make you look dumb Newsflash, you're retarded accept it and move on You'll make much more money that way

    3.3K13817439661K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026

    How funny would it be if we went up to $90k in one candle I think that'd be pretty funny

    3.3K10520425169K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.6K interactions against 798K followers, an engagement rate of 0.33%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 145K times each, and 1.81% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 18.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 24% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.3K interactions, about 3.1x its own typical post.

What is DonAlt's engagement rate on X?
DonAlt (@DonAlt) has an engagement rate of 0.33%, based on the median interactions across 29 original posts from the last 30 days against 797,682 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.33%, DonAlt sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DonAlt have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @DonAlt post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.23 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going