Back to @DolceeKarma's profile

Chicas Karma 😏 engagement report

@DolceeKarma - 159K followers on X

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.004%
of 159K followers
Per impression
0.078%
7.7K views on a typical post
Reach
4.80%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
6
interactions (median)
Saved
0.013%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.33/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Tuesday

Early reading. We have captured 7 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 159K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Posts are seen about 7.7K times each, and 0.078% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.80% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.6K interactions, about 605x its own typical post. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.004%, Chicas Karma 😏 sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,186 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,186 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,400 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video43% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 43% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 54 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 11, 2026605x their median

    Sábado por la tarde 😉😏 https://t.co/CU95VVENjv

    3.5K81470174K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 2026171x their median

    Buenas noches, respetables autoridades @Profeco @SEGOB_mx. Quisiera exponer el robo que nos está haciendo el proveedor de estadísticas en México para casinos (@OptaSTATS @StatsPerform) ya que hubo 3 atajadas por parte del jugador Camilo Vargas (se anexa evidencia) y solo nos están marcando dos, las del minuto 45+6 y 45+9, si bien las acciones de juego son a criterio, me parece que es muy evidente que esta jugada al minuto 78 llevaba dirección de portería. Esta situación no debería afectar al consumidor ni justificar el incumplimiento del pago de una apuesta válida, así que en nombre del pueblo mexicano, solicito la revisión del caso y una solución justa conforme a los derechos del consumidor. Protesto lo necesario. https://t.co/p5Pc61V1a9

    7641351168229K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 202623x their median

    Hay miradas que te desvisten mucho antes de tocarte.

    112230010K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20266.5x their median

    😴 https://t.co/iRyDCSgufn

    390005.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20265.5x their median

    Unos ojitos 😍 https://t.co/eZ7M21wwQf

    321006.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20265.3x their median

    📸 https://t.co/bDAFS6oqr3

    320004.6K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 20264.7x their median

    No te deseo el mal, pero ojalá te enamores de alguien que sea exactamente igual a ti. 🙏🏻

    244006.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20264.3x their median

    Tu error fue asumir que mi paciencia era infinita y mi memoria muy corta.

    206004.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20264.3x their median

    No me dolió perderte, me dolió el tiempo que perdí convenciéndome de que valías la pena.

    215005.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20263.7x their median

    Empezando el día con algo básico https://t.co/E4AZTmxsZu

    211006.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 159K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Posts are seen about 7.7K times each, and 0.078% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.80% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.6K interactions, about 605x its own typical post. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Chicas Karma 😏's engagement rate on X?
Chicas Karma 😏 (@DolceeKarma) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 7 original posts from the last 30 days against 159,350 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.004%, Chicas Karma 😏 sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,186 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DolceeKarma have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @DolceeKarma post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going