Back to @DmytroKuleba's profile

Dmytro Kuleba engagement report

@DmytroKuleba - 1.1M followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.028%
of 1.1M followers
Per impression
0.742%
43K views on a typical post
Reach
3.81%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
322
interactions (median)
Saved
0.021%
9 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.17/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
07:00 UTC
Friday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 322 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Posts are seen about 43K times each, and 0.742% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.81% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.17 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 36K interactions, about 111x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026. Recurring tag: #ukraine.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.028%, Dmytro Kuleba sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,583 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 255 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Nov 25, 2024111x their median

    Hi @joerogan, freaking at Ukrainians without giving them a chance to speak isn’t a fair fight. If you ever feel like having a real conversation, let’s sit down and chat about anything Ukraine-related – dragons included. You know your stuff, I know mine. Cigars on me.

    30K3.8K1.9K3082.2M viewsView on X
  • Nov 29, 202459x their median

    The fall of Aleppo in 2016 was a grim prelude to Bucha, Mariupol, and Bakhmut in 2022. It was in Syria that Russian pilots learned how to raze Ukrainian cities to the ground. The world’s failure to stand up to Putin and Assad back then became an open invitation for Putin to invade Ukraine. Today’s rebel success in Aleppo is promising. With Putin’s army being decimated in Ukraine, he likely can’t spare sufficient forces to save Assad. But the lesson remains: 2016 and 2022 could’ve been avoided if from the very beginning democracies had fought tyrants instead of just shaking the air with words.

    15K3.5K651260952K viewsView on X
  • Dec 7, 202453x their median

    As I predicted here a week ago, Putin has thrown Assad under the bus to prolong his war in Ukraine. His resources are scarce, and he is not as strong as he pretends. To those claiming Russia cannot be defeated and that Ukraine must concede, or to those arguing the West lacks resources to confront Putin—you better stop misleading the public and advancing the agenda of a “great” Russia. Being eventually exposed as fools and losers is likely not something you’re looking forward to. The strategies that gained prominence during the Cold War on the assumption that Russia matters now risk leading the West to defeat in this era of hot wars waged by Russia to showcase Western weakness to the whole world.

    13K3.0K485122635K viewsView on X
  • Nov 18, 202446x their median

    The new Russian UAV ‘Gerbera’, which imitates the Shahed-136/Geran-2 to overload Ukrainian air defence, turned out to be a modified prototype of the Chinese aircraft model manufacturer Skywalker Technology Co., Ltd. This was reported by the Defence Intelligence of Ukraine on their website "War & Sanctions". Russia is only assembling the drone at its Alabuga factory, using kits originally imported from China. Moreover, it contained electronics from 18 Western companies. List of companies whose components were detected in the drone: 6 companies from China: Skywalker Technology Co, Ltd, Mile Hao Xiang Technology, Topotek, Xingkay Tech, UIY Inc and XLSEMI. They also use elements from 18 international companies: Texas Instruments, National Semiconductor, ATMEL Corporation, U-blox, STMicroelectronics, NXP Semiconductors, Altera Corporation, Infineon Technologies, Ampleon, Xilinx Inc, Realtek, Pulse Electronics Corporation, Micron Technology, Analog Devices, Integrated Silicon Solution, Monolithic Power Systems, Linear Technology Corporation. @AD_News @NXP @GregAbbot_TX @ST_World @broadcom @monolithicpower @EllieTopotek @Mary39420834 @ublox @AmpleonRF @Carolin30198767 @AMD @XilinxInc @MicronTech @NatSemiNet @MicrochipTech

    6.6K6.2K1.3K762669K viewsView on X
  • Nov 29, 202424x their median

    The Georgian government cloaked its creeping concessions to Russia with promises to avoid the so-called “Ukrainian scenario,” referring to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Tragically, what we are witnessing in Georgia today is precisely a Ukrainian scenario - but of a different kind. Georgia in November 2024 mirrors Ukraine in November 2013. Ivanishvili, like Yanukovych back then, is following the same playbook. Exactly 11 years ago, Ukraine’s Revolution of Dignity began in November 2013, when Yanukovych announced he would not sign the EU Association Agreement, sparking nationwide protests. Ukrainians stood up then, refusing to let their freedom be taken, and their fight changed the course of history. Today’s pattern for Georgia is clear: first, they take away freedom, then they start beating you, prosperity vanishes next, and then Russia consumes you. To those in the streets of Tbilisi: your fight today is about more than being pro-European or pro-Russian; it’s about the fundamental right to live freely. You are a proud nation. Fight and prevail - don’t let them steal your future.

    6.0K1.5K18271276K viewsView on X
  • Apr 30, 202624x their median

    “Putin is dangerous, but he is not 10 feet tall. Nor is he invincible. He has been made to appear stronger than he is by years of wishful thinking, self-deterrence and delay in the West. Russia can be contained. Ukraine can prevail. All that is required is clarity: to call Putin what he is – an enemy” More in my piece for @theipaper at https://t.co/rti44FyxyP PS: The text delivers. The photo, less so.

    5.5K1.5K53358109K viewsView on X
  • Nov 16, 202422x their median

    A few months ago, Chancellor Scholz asked President Zelensky whether a call to Putin would be appropriate. Zelensky opposed the idea, and Scholz refrained. However, after the US elections, Scholz decided the time had come and made the call. Zelensky publicly but gently criticized him for it. What’s the result? 1. The call doesn’t seem to mean anything significant to improve Scholz’s image among German voters sympathetic to Russia. 2. Putin broke out of European isolation, and Germany paved the way. Right after Hungary. 3. Trust between Zelensky and Scholz has been strained. Keep in mind, Germany is Ukraine’s second-largest provider of military assistance after the US. 4. Germany’s hard-won reputation among Ukrainians has taken a significant hit. 5. Putin showcased to the world that his strategy is working - the West will eventually bow its head under the cover of urging him to stop the war which he is not going to do. I may not be privy to all the arguments in favor of the call, but I struggle to see how it was justified. In English, they call it a “false start.” What’s the equivalent term in German?

    5.5K1.2K32574372K viewsView on X
  • May 8, 202621x their median

    Kyiv drew its own long-range map — and threw it on the table. A great achievement for Ukraine. A lesson for others. For years, Ukraine asked its partners for long-range weapons to strike deep inside Russia. Guided by escalation concerns, some refused outright (Germany and Taurus); some provided them only in very limited quantities and long barred strikes against targets inside Russia (the US and ATACMS); while others agreed but supplied them in limited batches and imposed restrictions on their employment (the UK with Storm Shadow and France with SCALP). It was a hard fight with friends. Meanwhile, Ukraine did not sit still. It spent these years developing its own capabilities. Today, Kyiv produces enough long-range drones and missiles of sufficient quality to strike Russia regularly and deep behind the front lines. This is not a turning point in the war. But it is a qualitatively new instrument of pressure on Putin at a time when Trump is unwilling to bear down on him and Europeans lack the ability to do so. Most importantly, it is a powerful example of how a nation builds its own capabilities and reduces critical dependence on partners.

    5.5K1.1K18945195K viewsView on X
  • May 12, 202620x their median

    A German friend told me today he was struck by how Ukraine seemed to be regaining control over the dynamics of the war. I would not call it a strategic turn yet. But the shift is real. Here are three reasons why👇

    5.7K65917226391K viewsView on X
  • May 28, 202620x their median

    News of the Gripen deal for Ukraine is another major achievement by Zelenskyy in strengthening the country’s defense. And another step in deepening Ukraine’s special relationship with Sweden. But the bigger question is this: is Ukraine becoming a Nordic country? Not geographically. Strategically. For decades, Ukrainians thought of their place in Europe through the lens of Central and Eastern Europe. Some dreamed of an arc from the Baltic to the Black Sea. After 2022, reality began to change doctrine. A renaissance in Ukraine’s relations with Northern Europe began. It was driven by three forces: the North’s leadership in supporting Ukraine, backed by resources; frictions with partners in Central Europe; and Ukraine’s search for more strategic anchors in Europe. For Ukrainians, this movement makes sense. More than a thousand years ago, the Varangians were an important part of the rise of Rus. In the early 18th century, Sweden was already an ally of Ukraine’s attempt to break free from Moscow’s rule. But this is not only about history. Ukrainians are drawn to the Nordic world, where strength does not contradict democracy, defense does not contradict prosperity, technology reinforces resilience, and cool-headedness serves freedom and dignity. Kyiv will not change its geography. But its center of gravity is changing. The Vikings are returning to Ukraine. And Ukrainians are charting their country’s path to the North. It is still unclear where this will lead. But it is already a fascinating turn of history.

    5.2K82120267237K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ukraine

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 322 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Posts are seen about 43K times each, and 0.742% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.81% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.17 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 36K interactions, about 111x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Dmytro Kuleba's engagement rate on X?
Dmytro Kuleba (@DmytroKuleba) has an engagement rate of 0.028%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,138,068 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.028%, Dmytro Kuleba sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DmytroKuleba have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @DmytroKuleba post?
Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going