Back to @DiegoArcos14's profile

๐’Ÿ๐‘–๐‘’๐‘”๐‘œ ๐’œ๐‘Ÿ๐‘๐‘œ๐‘  ๐’ฎ๐‘Ž๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ๐‘’๐‘‘๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ž engagement report

@DiegoArcos14 - 689K followers on X

Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.017%
of 689K followers
Per impression
0.76%
15K views on a typical post
Reach
2.22%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
116
interactions (median)
Saved
0.006%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 116 interactions against 689K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 41% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 0.76% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 38K interactions, about 332x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #juevesdehistoriaenimagenes, #denunciaciudadana, #deportivocuenca.

Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026. Recurring tags: #juevesdehistoriaenimagenes, #denunciaciudadana, #deportivocuenca.

Compared with accounts its own size

๐’Ÿ๐‘–๐‘’๐‘”๐‘œ ๐’œ๐‘Ÿ๐‘๐‘œ๐‘  ๐’ฎ๐‘Ž๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ๐‘’๐‘‘๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ž's engagement rate beats 41% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 40% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.017%, ๐’Ÿ๐‘–๐‘’๐‘”๐‘œ ๐’œ๐‘Ÿ๐‘๐‘œ๐‘  ๐’ฎ๐‘Ž๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ๐‘’๐‘‘๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ž sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video65% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link7% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 65% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 174 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 23, 2026332x their median

    ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿ”ดโšช๏ธ Lille agree deal to sign Orlando Gill from San Lorenzo, here we go! ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡พ Paraguay hero at World Cup set to join Lille for โ‚ฌ3.6m and 50% sell-on, as @CLMerlo reports. Gill has already agreed on terms and will play under coach Davide Ancelotti. https://t.co/SPTpPQndjP

    36K2.0K3743933.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 2026114x their median

    Impactante este rescate de una ballena hecho por un pescador chileno. ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿณ๐Ÿšฃ๐Ÿผ https://t.co/nLJnMgZcw5

    11K1.7K18476659K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 202674x their median

    10 Mozart Classics You Know by Sound, but Not by Name https://t.co/GwmJkPaO5B

    7.5K1.0K4846897K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202629x their median

    Coors Field absolutely packed tonight for a Rockies team on pace to lose 101 games. Denver is such a great baseball city โ€” it needs a competent squad. Hopefully soon. https://t.co/9AWH6NXO79

    3.1K5918147342K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202624x their median

    Hace 25 aรฑos se estrenaba una de las miniseries mรกs perfectas jamรกs hechas. Band Of Brothers (2001) nos mostrรณ un realismo, unos personajes, un mensaje y unos testimonios muy potentes. Una obra que trasciende el tiempo. https://t.co/oDemvbkkEO

    2.5K2994227241K viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 201924x their median

    Si estas en busca de una prensa unรกnime, entregada al culto de tu personalidad o ideologรญa...no sigas esta cuenta.

    2.2K12946311View on X
  • Jul 27, 202223x their median

    Si no lo intentas nunca lo sabrรกs. ยกEnhorabuena por el regreso de la pelota chica! #VoyPorTiYeyo โšพ๏ธ๐ŸŸ https://t.co/GVIud3qhxA

    1.6K30711471View on X
  • Aug 30, 202618x their median

    Definitivamente hay alguien en el aeropuerto de Galรกpagos que recibe dinero y deja pasar las iguanas para traerlas al continente y luego llevarlas al exterior.

    1.7K33829943K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202612x their median

    #DenunciaCiudadana โ€‹Irresponsabilidad total! En Latacunga, ciclistas transitan entre los vehรญculos en medio de la vรญa arriesgando su vida de manera innecesaria. Pero cuando ocurre la tragedia buscan culpables. https://t.co/s7Vy9nhVVT

    97532210730179K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202611x their median

    Y ahora por el brasileirao!!!...y con molde similar al que hizo en libertadores...Keny Arroyo le vuelve a marcar a Flamengo...golazo!!!!...como que le soltaron amarras a los ecuatorianos este fin de semana !!! https://t.co/XLNQVINLhI

    1.1K8714030K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#juevesdehistoriaenimagenes#denunciaciudadana#deportivocuenca#flamengo#lavuelta26

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 116 interactions against 689K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 41% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 0.76% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 38K interactions, about 332x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #juevesdehistoriaenimagenes, #denunciaciudadana, #deportivocuenca.

What is ๐’Ÿ๐‘–๐‘’๐‘”๐‘œ ๐’œ๐‘Ÿ๐‘๐‘œ๐‘  ๐’ฎ๐‘Ž๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ๐‘’๐‘‘๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ž's engagement rate on X?
๐’Ÿ๐‘–๐‘’๐‘”๐‘œ ๐’œ๐‘Ÿ๐‘๐‘œ๐‘  ๐’ฎ๐‘Ž๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ๐‘’๐‘‘๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ž (@DiegoArcos14) has an engagement rate of 0.017%, based on the median interactions across 46 original posts from the last 30 days against 689,452 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.017%, ๐’Ÿ๐‘–๐‘’๐‘”๐‘œ ๐’œ๐‘Ÿ๐‘๐‘œ๐‘  ๐’ฎ๐‘Ž๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ๐‘’๐‘‘๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ž sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DiegoArcos14 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 41% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @DiegoArcos14 post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going