Back to @DiamondandSilk's profile

Diamond and Silk® engagement report

@DiamondandSilk - 2.4M followers on X

Measured over 265 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.004%
of 2.4M followers
Per impression
0.884%
10K views on a typical post
Reach
0.42%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
90
interactions (median)
Saved
0.01%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
21.13/day
active 103% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 90 interactions against 2.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 265 original posts, its engagement rate beats 22% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 0.884% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.423% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 21.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 265 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video, 48% are part of a thread and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 36K interactions, about 405x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #diamondandsilk, #breakingnews, #politics.

Measured over 265 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #diamondandsilk, #breakingnews, #politics.

Compared with accounts its own size

Diamond and Silk®'s engagement rate beats 22% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 44% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.004%, Diamond and Silk® sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video74% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link29% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 74% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 29% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 273 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 18, 2026405x their median

    🚨 BREAKING: Jaw-dropping undercover footage reveals Minnesota will allow MEMBERS OF HAMAS — foreigners without ID — to VOTE as long as someone “vouches” for them They straight up ask her — could Hamas vote? She says YES, if he’s VOUCHED for 🤯 This is utter insanity. Minnesota is literally acting like a 3rd world country The vouching law must be STRUCK DOWN and we need the SAVE AMERICA ACT! 🇺🇸 https://t.co/0qK5hnUG5v

    24K11K617431274K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 2026284x their median

    🚨🚨 SCANDAL: "Anthony Fauci illegally experimented on orphaned children"... "He buried their bodies in an unmarked mass grave to cover it up".... "Fauci made sure none of those children had guardians, which is illegal, and then hid from the boards what he was doing. He took in foster homes across six states and handed them over to the pharmaceutical industry"... "He made sure the people running those foster homes didn't even have medical training. Most of them were immigrants from the Dominican Republic. They knew nothing about medicine or responsibilities and were sick themselves"... "And little by little they realized what was being done to those children, that they were torturing them. And, you know, there are videos of those children, an old BBC documentary that'll make you cry". "I promise you can watch this without crying. One of these kids, 12 years old, is trying to protect an 8-year-old boy and has a tube in his stomach. And he says to them: 'I tried to fight them' and that's what they do"... "If you fight them, you can't fight them. You just have to take the medications, and the kids didn't want to take them because they were making them terribly sick. And Celia Farber was this incredible investigator who worked on this chapter for me and did a lot of the original research on it"... "She went to Hawthorne, New York, to the Gates of Heaven cemetery. She found the cemetery where Fauci was disposing of the bodies of these children who died in his illegal experiments"... "She found an open pit, covered by a carpet of artificial grass. She pulled back the carpet and saw hundreds and hundreds of little coffins stacked haphazardly on top of each other, because they were children with no parents and no one there to protect them"... "And Tony Fauci treated them like collateral damage and, you know, his goal was to expand markets for these pharmaceutical companies he'd partnered with by allowing toxic chemotherapy drugs against HIV to be administered to the children"... "And then the next experiments, which are in the following chapter and are equally horrific, are his experiments in Africa"... Robert F Kennedy Jr.

    15K8.4K1.7K8601.2M viewsView on X
  • Oct 17, 2026184x their median

    🤣 LMAO! This MAGA patriot is the life of the party at the Trump rally in Kentucky — Democrats cannot STAND he's black "Do you see how happy he is?" "That is a man who loves his country, who LOVES his president, and LOVES TO DANCE!" 😅🔥 This man is LIGHTING UP THE ROOM! Democrats hate this sight. WE are the REAL party of joy 🇺🇸

    13K3.1K378122336K viewsView on X
  • Oct 22, 2026160x their median

    LeBron James is facing massive backlash after cameras caught him practicing an imaginary golf swing during the National Anthem before the 76ers' opener. Fans are calling the move "insufferable" and "disrespectful" to the flag. 🇺🇸⛳ https://t.co/l4M3TWEy44

    10.0K2.6K1.6K23885K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 2026157x their median

    🚨 BREAKING: New records prove disgraced Special Counsel Jack Smith not only obtained FINANCIAL RECORDS from EVERY DAY AMERICANS donating to Republicans — but Smith spied on communications between JOURNALISTS and GOP or Trump-aligned officials, per Fox JACK SMITH HAS TO BE LOCKED UP!! SEN. CHUCK GRASSLEY RAGES: "Every member of this committee ought to be OUTRAGED for what happened to their constituents!" Apparently, some of the donations were as little as $5...THAT'S who Jack Smith was worried about Per Grassley, the feds will "forever possess" thousands of people's bank information as part of this sham investigation Jack Smith trampled justice. CRIMINAL REFERRAL!

    9.7K3.7K607151325K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026157x their median

    Do yourself a favor and watch a father whose daughter was permanently disabled by an illegal alien with a CDL completely roast Democrats to their faces. https://t.co/WKz4pTUE8t

    11K2.7K289238330K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 2026147x their median

    Happy 80th Birthday to my amazing Father, Mr Hardaway. Hope your day is full of Love, Peace, Joy and Happiness. Love you Daddy 🥰 https://t.co/pERM4L2pDm

    12K8415362676K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026143x their median

    🚨 BREAKING: Donald Trump just dropped a bombshell in an interview with Glenn Beck, stating he would "absolutely prohibit" Sharia law in America. Pointing to Europe, he emphasized that the U.S. must remain governed by a single legal system. "We have one system. We have a great system." Do you agree with his stance? 👇 #Trump #Election2026 #AmericaFirst #BreakingNews

    10K2.5K2898674K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026138x their median

    Where the hell is Maxine Waters? #DiamondandSilk https://t.co/HkYeiotCFq

    9.7K2.3K3025368K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 2026105x their median

    Fox News is sparking intense backlash after hiring former Andrew Cuomo aide Melissa DeRosa as a contributor and podcast host. Former Fox weathercaster Janice Dean unloaded on the move: “Melissa DeRosa helped smear the women who came forward about Andrew Cuomo’s harassment, and played a hand in undercounting nursing home deaths during COVID. Also tried to silence my advocacy.” Is this a step too far for the network's viewers? Share your thoughts below. 📷

    6.3K2.5K51613797K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#diamondandsilk#breakingnews#politics#shorts#trump

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 90 interactions against 2.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 265 original posts, its engagement rate beats 22% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 0.884% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.423% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 21.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 265 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video, 48% are part of a thread and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 36K interactions, about 405x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #diamondandsilk, #breakingnews, #politics.

What is Diamond and Silk®'s engagement rate on X?
Diamond and Silk® (@DiamondandSilk) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 265 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,410,367 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.004%, Diamond and Silk® sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DiamondandSilk have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 22% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @DiamondandSilk post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 21.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going