Dexconer空 空🐕 engagement report
@Dexconer - 155K followers on X
Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 50 interactions against 155K followers, an engagement rate of 0.032%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.9K times each, and 0.724% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 136 interactions, about 2.7x its own typical post.
Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026. Recurring tag: #cyberleek.
Compared with accounts its own size
Dexconer空 空🐕's engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 33% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.032%, Dexconer空 空🐕 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 8% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 8% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 405 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 10, 20262.7x their median
在我看来， $Dealer 是一个具备长期发展潜力、值得持续关注的项目，其真正吸引人的地方并不只是短期市场热度，而是对未来生态建设和实际价值创造的重视。 随着加密市场逐渐从单纯追逐叙事转向更加注重产品、用户与生态协同，Dealer 所展现出的发展方向有望获得更多市场认可。 一个项目能否走得更远，关键在于团队持续建设的能力、社区参与度以及能否不断拓展真实应用场景，而 Dealer 在这些方面都具备进一步成长的空间。从市场发展的角度来看，如果未来能够持续优化产品体验、扩大用户基础并加强生态合作，Dealer 的整体竞争力有机会得到进一步提升。 与此同时，项目如果能够保持清晰的发展节奏，在市场波动中坚持长期建设，而不是过度依赖短期热点，那么这种稳定性本身也会成为未来价值增长的重要基础。 更值得期待的是，随着行业基础设施不断完善以及用户对优质项目的筛选标准逐渐提高，拥有明确定位和持续执行能力的项目将拥有更大的成长空间，而 Dealer 正处于一个值得观察和期待的位置。 综合来看，我认为 Dealer 的未来想象空间依然值得重视，只要团队继续保持建设效率并不断提升生态质量，相信它有机会在未来竞争更加激烈的市场中形成自己的优势。 https://t.co/lNaM7jJwpO 6f8ZQhxqfigdv7UszZ1rirbV7Sgv83s3rxv1N2Zopump
- Aug 26, 20261.6x their median
在我看来，一个真正值得长期关注的项目，并不是只依靠短期热度，而是要有清晰的发展方向、持续建设的能力，以及能够不断吸引用户参与的生态基础。🌱 而我对 $OBS 的印象正是如此。🔥 从目前的发展思路来看，OBS 正在逐渐建立属于自己的定位，并通过产品、生态与社区之间的协同，为未来的持续增长打下基础。一个项目能够保持长期活力，关键就在于团队是否愿意持续迭代、不断优化用户体验，并根据市场变化寻找新的突破点。🚀 我尤其看好 OBS 后续的发展空间。随着 用户对交易效率、生态体验以及创新产品的需求不断提升，拥有明确方向和持续建设能力的项目，有机会在竞争激烈的市场中逐渐形成自己的优势。 当然，任何项目的发展都需要时间沉淀，但从个人角度来看，我认为 OBS 具备进一步成长的潜力。只要团队能够坚持长期主义，不断完善产品和生态，同时持续扩大社区影响力，未来仍然值得保持关注。💎 希望 OBS 可以一步一个脚印，把现在的基础转化为更强的生态价值，在未来带给社区更多惊喜。🚀🌎 Contract: 0xfe242d1Da8FD04f6A1F80B6D3d807B02e062Ad4E 更多动态可以关注：@ObscuraCEX
- Aug 11, 20261.6x their median
$MANCER 展现出了较强的发展潜力，从项目定位到整体生态建设都体现出清晰而积极的长期思路。💥💥💥 随着社区不断扩大和市场关注度提升，MANCER有机会进一步完善自身的应用场景，并形成更加稳定的用户基础。 我认为项目真正值得期待的地方，在于团队持续推进产品建设和生态扩展的能力，这将成为未来价值增长的重要支撑。 如果后续能够持续保持创新节奏，同时加强社区互动与实际应用落地，MANCER的市场影响力还有很大的提升空间。 从长期角度来看，MANCER具备值得持续关注的成长空间，相信随着生态逐渐成熟，项目未来能够展现出更加亮眼的发展表现。 https://t.co/O4ppfqxgUM 0xc72F232a6869e6CF34dC06129AfFD07F8a2a246A
- Sep 13, 20261.6x their median
$CHUMP 近期引发了市场的广泛关注。在经历了一轮持续上涨后，随着价格攀升且交易活跃度显著激增，市场对其关注度迅速升温。这种量价齐升的态势通常表明市场已将目光聚焦于此，CHUMP 现已成为备受瞩目的焦点。@ChumpCoinX 尽管短期资金的频繁进出带来了一定的波动，但从宏观走势来看，情况依然值得关注：在经历了最初的爆发式上涨后，市场似乎正步入一个更高位阶的盘整阶段。 0x0E0d2C89a5a019FE1cF762e5e33187631DACC21B 接下来的走势尤为值得期待。强劲的上涨行情往往需要时间来回调蓄势，并确立新的价格区间，为下一轮重大行情做准备。如果 CHUMP 能够保持强势，维持活跃的交易态势，并持续吸引新的关注，那么这一盘整期有望成为其开启下一阶段行情的坚实基础。
- Aug 18, 20261.5x their median
我认为 $TOAD 有着独特的成长空间，随着市场关注度逐渐提升，它有机会通过自身特色吸引更多用户和社区参与者。 一个项目能否走得长远，不只是看短期的市场表现，更重要的是能否持续积累影响力，而 TOAD 在这一方面展现出了值得关注的潜力。 如果未来能够不断加强社区建设、扩大品牌认知并保持稳定的发展节奏，TOAD 有望进一步提升自身在市场中的存在感。 我比较看好 TOAD 后续持续成长的可能性，尤其是在社区活跃度和市场关注不断增加的情况下，未来仍然拥有较大的想象空间。 整体来看，TOAD 是一个值得长期观察的项目，希望它能够不断完善自身优势，在未来的发展过程中取得更加亮眼的成绩。 https://t.co/Qww0Qr6cqv A13oRB9FFaiUjfi6LdCg6p9ka1u8SfGkUFs4SKvPpump
- Aug 11, 20261.5x their median
在我看来，一个项目真正的成长并不只是来自市场关注度，更重要的是它能否在不断变化的环境中找到清晰的定位，并持续释放自身的潜力。 $MANLET 让我关注的地方，正是它所展现出的发展空间以及未来进一步完善生态的可能性。 加密市场从来不缺少短期热点，但真正能够留下来的项目，往往需要具备持续迭代的能力。市场趋势会改变，用户需求也会不断变化，因此项目是否能够及时调整、优化自身方向，将直接影响未来的发展质量。MANLET 在这一点上具备值得期待的潜力。 从生态角度来看，一个项目的价值并不是单一维度能够决定的。产品体验、社区活跃度、用户参与以及后续生态扩展，都可能成为推动项目成长的重要因素。如果 MANLET 能够继续围绕这些方面进行建设，并不断吸收市场反馈，相信其整体生态会拥有更大的想象空间。 我也比较看重社区所形成的长期共识。一个有生命力的社区，不应该只是围绕价格进行讨论，而是能够逐渐形成对项目方向、文化和未来发展的认同。随着更多用户参与其中，MANLET 也有机会建立更加稳定的社区基础。 另外，项目未来的发展仍然需要时间来验证。相比短期数据，我更愿意关注 MANLET 接下来能否持续推出实际成果，以及团队是否能够保持稳定的执行节奏。只有真正把想法转化为持续的建设，项目的长期价值才有机会逐步体现出来。 综合来看，我认为 MANLET 具备值得持续关注的成长空间。未来如果能够进一步强化生态建设、扩大用户参与并持续提升自身竞争力，它或许能够在市场中找到更加清晰的位置。期待 MANLET 用时间和实际行动证明自己的潜力，也期待看到它在未来带来更多新的可能。 以上仅代表个人观点，不构成任何投资建议，请大家保持独立思考并做好自己的研究（DYOR）。 https://t.co/xb7VmJs8tF HxQhDGYqyjorgogMJx7YbBHADEDxuHhLnMMmr6VYpyn
- Aug 19, 2026
在我看来，一个项目能否真正形成长期价值，关键并不是短时间内获得多少关注，而是能否逐步建立清晰的定位，并让用户愿意持续参与其中。 $YOLO 目前展现出的社区关注度让我认为，它仍然拥有进一步发展的空间。如果未来能够持续围绕项目特色进行内容建设，同时不断提升社区互动质量，那么现有的市场关注或许能够逐渐沉淀为更加稳定的用户基础。 对于一个加密项目而言，社区始终是非常重要的组成部分。YOLO 如果能够不断创造更多开放的讨论机会，让社区成员不仅是信息的接受者，也能够参与内容创作、观点交流以及项目建设，那么社区内部的凝聚力有望进一步增强。当用户之间形成更加自然和积极的互动时，这种社区文化本身也可能成为项目持续成长的重要推动力。 我也比较关注 YOLO 在品牌塑造和叙事方向上的发展潜力。在竞争激烈的市场中，真正容易被记住的项目通常都有属于自己的风格和文化。如果 YOLO 能够持续强化自身特色，保持稳定的内容输出，并通过长期社区运营形成更加鲜明的品牌认知，那么未来或许能够在众多项目中建立更独特的位置。 当然，市场趋势和用户需求始终处于变化之中，因此项目的适应能力同样重要。YOLO 如果能够根据社区反馈不断尝试新的互动方式和发展方向，同时保持自身核心特色，那么就有机会持续吸引新的用户，并进一步扩大社区影响力。相比追逐短期热点，我更愿意观察它能否在长期运营中不断积累实际成果。 归根结底，一个项目真正的潜力还是需要时间和实际表现来验证。对我而言，YOLO 后续在社区活跃度、品牌建设、用户参与以及生态发展方面的表现，比短期市场波动更加值得关注。如果能够将当前的关注度逐步转化为稳定的社区基础和持续的项目活力，那么 YOLO 的长期发展空间仍然值得继续观察。 以上仅代表个人观点，不构成任何投资建议，请大家保持独立思考并做好自己的研究（DYOR）。 https://t.co/7wuQhrsX81 0x62C71cd34a52c30d894419CBcc55Db2aFA8032eA
- Aug 19, 2026
在我看来， $EYE 的价值并不只是体现在当前的市场讨论度，更重要的是它展现出了持续成长和建立自身特色的潜力。 如果未来能够围绕项目定位不断完善发展方向，同时加强社区建设与用户互动，相信 EYE 能够逐步积累更加稳定的基础。 一个优秀项目需要经得起时间的考验，而 EYE 如果能够保持持续建设和积极创新，就有机会获得更多长期参与者的认可。 随着生态不断拓展以及品牌影响力逐渐提升，EYE 未来或许能够形成更鲜明的市场定位，并拥有更大的发展空间。 从长期角度来看，我对 EYE 的后续表现保持乐观，期待项目继续稳步推进，在未来展现出更加成熟和亮眼的发展潜力。 https://t.co/B7Vmxca1O6 RmtMAYVTTFv2iK9muMrXEoAnSSsZPPgRPbqZCKwNDYk
- Aug 18, 2026
我觉得 $GPS 有着比较清晰的成长潜力，在不断变化的市场环境中依然具备值得关注的发展空间。💫💫💫 相比只追求短期热度的项目，GPS 更值得期待的是未来持续建设和积累社区影响力的能力。 如果后续能够不断完善项目生态，提升用户体验并扩大社区规模，相信 GPS 的市场认知度会进一步提高。 随着更多用户了解并参与其中，GPS 有机会逐渐形成更加稳定的社区基础，并释放更大的成长潜力。 总体来说，我对 GPS 的未来发展保持积极态度，期待它能够持续突破，在未来市场中取得更加亮眼的表现。 https://t.co/j9Fs5VH6wl 0x9A4a67721573f2c9209DfFf972c52Be4E3F6642e
- Aug 13, 2026
$CETS 展现出了清晰的发展方向和持续建设的潜力，从整体规划来看具有不错的长期价值。💥💥💥 项目不仅关注当前的生态建设，也在不断寻找新的发展空间，为未来扩大影响力打下基础。 随着社区活跃度和用户认可度逐步提升，CETS有机会形成更加稳定且具有竞争力的生态。 如果团队能够持续推进产品、技术和社区建设，相信项目未来的发展空间会更加广阔。 从长期角度来看，CETS值得持续关注，未来有望凭借自身优势取得更好的成长表现。 https://t.co/1gDTjUW9dZ 0xB0c2aB5af4028461acE3f6e1C33a4eE1404E7777
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 50 interactions against 155K followers, an engagement rate of 0.032%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.9K times each, and 0.724% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 136 interactions, about 2.7x its own typical post.
- What is Dexconer空 空🐕's engagement rate on X?
- Dexconer空 空🐕 (@Dexconer) has an engagement rate of 0.032%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 154,799 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.032%, Dexconer空 空🐕 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Dexconer have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Dexconer post?
- Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.47 posts per day across the measured window.