Back to @DesireToSee's profile

That's Freaking Amazing engagement report

@DesireToSee - 869K followers on X

Measured over 69 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.074%
of 869K followers
Per impression
1.57%
41K views on a typical post
Reach
4.74%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
646
interactions (median)
Saved
0.129%
53 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.3/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 646 interactions against 869K followers, an engagement rate of 0.074%. Measured over 69 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 3,809 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 41K times each, and 1.57% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.75% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 69 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 26x its own typical post.

Measured over 69 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

That's Freaking Amazing's engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,809 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 63% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.074%, That's Freaking Amazing sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,960 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,960 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,518 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%102K
16:00 UTC-3%99K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-2%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%233K
Monday0%292K
Tuesday-3%284K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%246K
Friday-3%255K
Saturday+3%229K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 15, 202626x their median

    Great actress 😂 https://t.co/9HPhMzqVTW

    15K1.7K10475706K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 202621x their median

    A kind couple rescued a pregnant otter that was calling for help, and then…🥰 https://t.co/1CILLWk3wv

    13K796455761K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 202616x their median

    This scene is an example of top tier creativity during Hong Kong’s golden era. https://t.co/QFfqnM5yYn

    9.8K60481182.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202614x their median

    What God cannot do is not exist 😃😃 https://t.co/M5f06Vboa8

    8.5K4546714223K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20269.5x their median

    You won’t believe ur eyes! 🤯🔥 https://t.co/SH4Mw8j4pd

    5.6K524138291K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20264.8x their median

    There are heroes who don't wear a cape, but have a tail. He understood the danger before anyone else. A four-legged angel. ✨🐶 https://t.co/LhDoa4nRPW

    2.9K20233377K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20264.5x their median

    A 3-month-old pitbull puppy went to the beach for the first time… he played so much that, on the way back, he chose his owner's sister as his official pillow. 😂🐶 https://t.co/mFW7eiXbm7

    2.8K841281K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20264.2x their median

    Every living being with a heartbeat knows what love feels like 🫶🦉 https://t.co/swT7aJOUO9

    2.5K17121956K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20262.5x their median

    Strength Vs Stamina https://t.co/zY8FcHu3qh

    1.6K2631393K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20262.4x their median

    Give that green parrot an Oscar right now... The dramatic delayed reaction was absolute perfection 😂🦜 https://t.co/g9QT3DJ6Wc

    1.4K1569646K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 646 interactions against 869K followers, an engagement rate of 0.074%. Measured over 69 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 3,809 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 41K times each, and 1.57% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.75% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 69 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 26x its own typical post.

What is That's Freaking Amazing's engagement rate on X?
That's Freaking Amazing (@DesireToSee) has an engagement rate of 0.074%, based on the median interactions across 69 original posts from the last 30 days against 869,367 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.074%, That's Freaking Amazing sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,960 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DesireToSee have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,809 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @DesireToSee post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going