Back to @DeryaTR_'s profile

Derya Unutmaz, MD engagement report

@DeryaTR_ - 343K followers on X

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.097%
of 343K followers
Per impression
2.36%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
4.11%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
333
interactions (median)
Saved
0.135%
19 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.37/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 333 interactions against 343K followers, an engagement rate of 0.097%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 2.36% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.11% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 66% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 55x its own typical post.

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026. Recurring tag: #ardd2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Derya Unutmaz, MD's engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 72% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.097%, Derya Unutmaz, MD sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video66% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link9% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 66% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 9% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 362 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 30, 202655x their median

    Your Codex and ChatGPT Work reset will land at 6pm PST. I challenge you to burn as much usage as you can and discover and the latest awesome features. Time to go /fast

    14K5782.7K8752.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202628x their median

    Bullish

    7.7K1691.3K1231.9M viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 202624x their median

    i asked GPT 6 Pro and Fable 5.1 to rank all discoveries in the last three years 🔵 for Human discovered 🔴 for AI discovered (before October 6th) 🟢 for AI discovered from OpenAI/math repo 81% of them have been released today. wtf https://t.co/wU4Lsf18XH

    6.8K770172198782K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 202624x their median

    At this rate AI will get us GTA 7 before GTA 6

    7.3K29430570207K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 202618x their median

    Roundup of Day 2/ 2.1/ Approve for me (auto-review) is now included and does not use usage. Can be between 2-10% of plan when used. Also better for you. 2.2/ Simplified API for builders. 2.3/ Meeting notes integrated. 2.4/ Decisions API live for builders. Will use in the app to improve the experience.

    5.1K1566021952.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202617x their median

    No one is ready for what’s coming. The next generation of models will be an ontological shock.

    4.6K2654811911.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202613x their median

    1/ today we’re releasing muse spark 1.3—available in muse code & the meta model api. this is our most capable model yet—frontier performance almost too cheap to meter. much stronger at agentic and coding with better usability. we think users will really notice the jump. https://t.co/RW6n5NQsBw

    3.6K307200155651K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202613x their median

    Tobi and I had an argument: - He claims LLMs advantage people with ADHD, who start many things, LLMs work, people hop between them - I claim they advantage super-disciplined folks, LLMs are tremendous entropy-generators, controlling which is the name of the game Who is right?

    3.2K9486089359K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20268.5x their median

    🚨BREAKING: China's https://t.co/szf6zBfdFx has raised $5 billion. The interesting part is where the money is going: 60% of the net proceeds will fund next-generation GLM models and what https://t.co/szf6zBfdFx calls its 'Fully Self Training' system. https://t.co/szf6zBfdFx's stated goal is for each generation of GLM to build the environments used to train the next one, forming what the company itself calls a Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI) loop. They just raised billions to push on it.

    2.3K28416875660K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20267.8x their median

    Today, we’re bringing ChatGPT closer to the systems, information, and workflows healthcare teams already rely on. ♥️ We’re introducing a new EHR integration to connect supported Epic environments to ChatGPT and a plugin connecting to nine additional industry data sources. https://t.co/XlMtU4cFUt

    2.2K207123128994K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ardd2026

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 333 interactions against 343K followers, an engagement rate of 0.097%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 2.36% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.11% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 66% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 55x its own typical post.

What is Derya Unutmaz, MD's engagement rate on X?
Derya Unutmaz, MD (@DeryaTR_) has an engagement rate of 0.097%, based on the median interactions across 47 original posts from the last 30 days against 343,382 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.097%, Derya Unutmaz, MD sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DeryaTR_ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @DeryaTR_ post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going