Back to @DeniseMaerker's profile

Denise Maerker engagement report

@DeniseMaerker - 3.0M followers on X

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.004%
of 3.0M followers
Per impression
0.661%
21K views on a typical post
Reach
0.69%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
138
interactions (median)
Saved
0.041%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.07/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 138 interactions against 3.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 0.661% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.688% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 63% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 12x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #tercergradodeportivo, #podcast, #tercergrado.

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026. Recurring tags: #tercergradodeportivo, #podcast, #tercergrado.

Compared with accounts its own size

Denise Maerker's engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 39% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.004%, Denise Maerker sits above the 10th percentile of the 156,027 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,027 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,983 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video90% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link63% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 90% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 63% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 289 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 3, 202612x their median

    .@perezricart — “En dos años ha habido muchos desafíos a la autoridad de la presidenta y no diría que todos los ha ganado, pero de todos ha sobrevivido. A mí me gustaría verla mucho más echada para adelante en los temas de impunidad, sobre todo dentro del partido y del movimiento, ver a esa Claudia Sheinbaum que sí había en la Jefatura de Gobierno”. 🎧 Episodio donde nos acompaña @carlosbravoreg: https://t.co/Q1KPc9lPov

    1.2K2421071174K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 202610x their median

    El discurso de Felipe Calderón tiene un enorme eco ante la falta de liderazgos políticos en la oposición. https://t.co/9AVpmRuERp

    9631872662784K viewsView on X
  • Jul 8, 20269.4x their median

    ¿A qué jugará la Selección? Javier Aguirre revela el ADN táctico de Rafael Márquez como DT nacional: una amalgama directa entre Pep Guardiola y Ricardo La Volpe. Además, confiesa por qué le dijo "no" a Arabia Saudita. Narra en el podcast que, al terminar el partido contra Inglaterra, "les di un abrazo a cada uno; lloré con ellos porque se cerraba un círculo de amistad, más allá de lo profesional". Les dijo que estaba orgulloso de ellos y que los iba a extrañar. 🎧 Escucha la radiografía completa desde el banquillo de la Selección aquí: https://t.co/icyQIrBTLG

    1.3K8813061K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20266.7x their median

    —¿Ha llegado el momento de bajarle a la polarización y al discurso descalificador hacia los otros? —@A_MontielR: "Nosotros solamente decimos la verdad". 🎧 Escucha el episodio completo con la presidenta nacional de Morena: https://t.co/UBlLSrTHbo https://t.co/TsVYErC3aG

    57710922114101K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20266.3x their median

    .@perezricart — “No tenemos las figuras de Bolsonaro o de Milei o de Abelardo de la Espriella todavía. Sería lamentable que los partidos políticos de oposición le abrieran la puerta a ese tipo de figuras que no creen en la democracia y que están dispuestos a romperlo todo”. @carlosbravoreg — “Son personajes tan marginales y, de pronto, tan disruptivos, que nos cuesta trabajo tomarlos en serio hasta que ya es demasiado tarde. Ellos representan el hartazgo hacia los partidos tradicionales, hacia la clase política tradicional”. 🎧 Episodio completo: https://t.co/Q1KPc9lPov

    60510913023111K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20265.7x their median

    ¿La Inteligencia Artificial realmente puede convertirse en una amenaza para la humanidad? Carissa Véliz, filósofa mexicana y profesora e investigadora del Instituto de Ética en Inteligencia Artificial de Oxford, señala que la discusión actual sobre la IA tiene un tono parecido a: “los dioses están enojados con nosotros y están tratando de ahogarnos”. Sobre los bots que hackean sistemas, agrega que fueron hechos “por personas que están acostumbradísimas a romper las leyes sabiendo que se van a salir con la suya”.

    598139371547K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20265.1x their median

    “Nosotros gobernamos para el pueblo y el PRIAN gobernó para la mafia y los privilegios”. @A_MontielR, presidenta nacional de Morena, responde en mi podcast sobre las acusaciones de corrupción contra algunos funcionarios del partido. 🎧 Escucha el episodio completo: https://t.co/aECV9bYHOi

    401802121373K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 20264.1x their median

    Javier Aguirre: “No logramos el objetivo de meternos entre los ocho mejores del mundo, pero logramos sembrar algo, estoy seguro de ello”. 🇲🇽⚽ Podcast | Tras la eliminación, el estratega reconoció errores, defendió a sus jugadores y explicó por qué la selección nacional aún no logra competir al nivel de las grandes potencias. También habló del futuro del Tri, de Rafa Márquez y de los jóvenes que podrían marcar una nueva etapa. 🎧 https://t.co/icyQIrBlW8 #Hablemos #HablemosConDenise

    4657217438K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20264.0x their median

    Sigo lamentando que las instituciones mexicanas no se hayan fortalecido y que no tengamos investigaciones que nos permitan, en realidad, contraponer versiones con pruebas frente a los dichos de Estados Unidos… que se han caído en muchas ocasiones. https://t.co/DkHFi2vC0z

    259382164196K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20263.1x their median

    “La población estadounidense es menor que la que había hace cinco años en México”. ¿Cuáles son las posibles causas? 🎧 Esto me dijo la socióloga y demógrafa Silvia Giorguli (@Ssaucedo5050): https://t.co/xJwvFR618C https://t.co/wW3OHTYUK7

    3494039536K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#tercergradodeportivo#podcast#tercergrado#atandocabos#enpunto

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 138 interactions against 3.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 0.661% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.688% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 63% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 12x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #tercergradodeportivo, #podcast, #tercergrado.

What is Denise Maerker's engagement rate on X?
Denise Maerker (@DeniseMaerker) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 30 original posts from the last 30 days against 3,022,946 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.004%, Denise Maerker sits above the 10th percentile of the 156,027 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DeniseMaerker have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @DeniseMaerker post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going