Back to @DefundBBC's profile

Defund The BBC engagement report

@DefundBBC - 138K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.646%
of 138K followers
Per impression
7.68%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
8.42%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
894
interactions (median)
Saved
0.043%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.8/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 894 interactions against 138K followers, an engagement rate of 0.646%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 85% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 7.68% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.41% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 63% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 12x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #defundthebbc, #defundofcom.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #defundthebbc, #defundofcom.

Compared with accounts its own size

Defund The BBC's engagement rate beats 85% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 94% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.646%, Defund The BBC sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link13% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 265 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 3, 202612x their median

    🚨 WATCH: The BBC's on-air apology to Nigel Farage after misquoting his "pure cold rage" comment as "white cold rage" https://t.co/XDVcci5cNy

    8.7K1.1K8091781.5M viewsView on X
  • Jun 9, 20269.2x their median

    Man taken to hospital with 'serious injuries' after stabbing https://t.co/QrQVLvxssq

    3.0K4184.2K6414.1M viewsView on X
  • Jun 11, 20265.9x their median

    As ITV unveil there super-snazzy Brooklyn studio for the World Cup I do feel a bit for the BBC who will broadcasting games back in Salford. The location will have cost ITV a fortune and the BBC can’t win… if they go then there is criticism every day about the cost and, if they don’t go, they get hammered for staying at home. Must feel very distant at the moment though.

    4.4K144629591.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20264.9x their median

    🚨The outgoing Today programme presenter Amol Rajan has admitted the broadcaster is "screwed" and its finances are “much worse than people realise” because of a steep decline in licence fee revenue. Keep defunding. It's working! #DefundTheBBC https://t.co/GC96iQnsmV

    3.4K7791582932K viewsView on X
  • Jun 12, 20264.5x their median

    Jude Bellingham is expected to start England's World Cup opener 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿⁣ ⁣ John Stones and Ezri Konsa are favoured to start over Marc Guehi in defence. https://t.co/uUu5K6SqFX

    3.1K1213673773.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20263.5x their median

    Well well well, who would have thought it! The terrorism threat is greater now than on 9/11. Islamic extremism is named, not ‘right wing’ Brits. 🧐 https://t.co/dOzrEHBUmy

    2.3K66811933131K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20262.9x their median

    🚨The BBC has wheeled out a collection of rich, self-important celebrities to explain why you should keep paying their salaries. Meanwhile, 500,000+ more households walked away last year... Read the room. @BeccyRyan talks to @JuliaHB1 https://t.co/38Iceqiw4g

    2.2K35946239K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 20262.4x their median

    🚨The BBC licence fee could be replaced with a compulsory levy on people’s energy bills, the broadcaster’s new director-general has suggested. https://t.co/Ew4J3rTtZn

    70139287620267K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20261.8x their median

    How convenient. Ofcom “forgot” to publish data showing viewers trust GB News more than the BBC — despite publishing the figures every year. It only emerged after @GBNEWS demanded the data. #DefundTheBBC #DefundOfcom https://t.co/ixVYBotkWz

    1.3K31316412K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 2026

    🚨The BBC is in an “inescapable doom spiral”, we're told. And already the calls have begun for politicians to step in and secure more funding. 🗣️We say: good riddance🧵 #DefundtheBBC https://t.co/G752kEFGLx

    92617063108.1K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#defundthebbc#defundofcom

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 894 interactions against 138K followers, an engagement rate of 0.646%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 85% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 7.68% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.41% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 63% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 12x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #defundthebbc, #defundofcom.

What is Defund The BBC's engagement rate on X?
Defund The BBC (@DefundBBC) has an engagement rate of 0.646%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 138,460 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.646%, Defund The BBC sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DefundBBC have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 85% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @DefundBBC post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going