Back to @DarkBlueGoddess's profile

Dark-Blue engagement report

@DarkBlueGoddess - 226K followers on X

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.763%
of 226K followers
Per impression
3.43%
50K views on a typical post
Reach
22.2%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.7K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.379%
189 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.2/day
active 87% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 1.7K interactions against 226K followers, an engagement rate of 0.763%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 50K times each, and 3.43% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 22.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 14% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.6K interactions.

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Dark-Blue's engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 78% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.763%, Dark-Blue sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.679% to 2.56%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 82 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 19, 2026

    He thought he just met some cool girl that was just a little hornier and a little more adventurous in bed than the rest of them https://t.co/rtJaWDcXUo

    5.1K433768311K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20263.1x their median

    He started begging for a threesome just months after we started dating. He really should have been more specific https://t.co/05wfgg5KhI

    4.7K601459232K viewsView on X
  • May 6, 2026

    Who thinks I should dress him up again? https://t.co/ZivdQGK7Nw

    4.6K53910012177K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20263.0x their median

    Cucks aren’t completely useless. I like to use mine as a mattress https://t.co/KMtTuY8BUV

    4.5K6052711145K viewsView on X
  • May 14, 2026

    Your tiny dick is locked in a plastic cage. The woman you love is straddling your face with her dripping pussy open and ready for a man with a much bigger cock. Then he SPITS on her already wet hole to make sure he can slide his whole cock inside her. And you can’t even reach around to wipe his saliva off your mouth before he gets back to fucking her senseless just inches from your face

    4.5K602376346K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20262.9x their median

    How to brainwash your cuck: - Keep him locked for no less than two weeks - Tease him relentlessly about all the better sex you’re having without him - Dry pity handjob with ruined orgasm - Make him eat it - Repeat https://t.co/I9hXrw2sDB

    4.4K497339220K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20262.9x their median

    I call it a clit because it’s small AND because thirty seconds on the tip of a vibrator turns him into a squirting little slut https://t.co/znXzGoFm2P

    4.4K468316200K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20262.7x their median

    You can play with yourself but don’t cum yet. I want you to feel how loose he’s making me https://t.co/5rYfRoanus

    4.2K485156205K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20262.6x their median

    I’ve been fucked by so many guys in so many different hotel rooms that now I get wet at the check-in counter https://t.co/1uD9igCHkV

    4.1K369257128K viewsView on X
  • May 10, 2026

    What's more humiliating than watching the woman you love experience something you could never give her? https://t.co/IubdOKSJ3f

    3.8K456314269K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.7K interactions against 226K followers, an engagement rate of 0.763%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 50K times each, and 3.43% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 22.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 14% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.6K interactions.

What is Dark-Blue's engagement rate on X?
Dark-Blue (@DarkBlueGoddess) has an engagement rate of 0.763%, based on the median interactions across 29 original posts from the last 30 days against 226,189 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.763%, Dark-Blue sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DarkBlueGoddess have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @DarkBlueGoddess post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going