Back to @Daractenus's profile

Daractenus engagement report

@Daractenus - 76K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
1.09%
of 76K followers
Per impression
6.92%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
15.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
822
interactions (median)
Saved
0.244%
29 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.03/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
07:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 822 interactions against 76K followers, an engagement rate of 1.09%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 6.92% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 15.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 78% carry an image or video and 22% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.6K interactions, about 5.9x its own typical post.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Daractenus's engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 91% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.09%, Daractenus sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video78% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 78% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 255 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 25, 20265.9x their median

    With the Kremlin again trying to convince the world that Russia is a "traditional values" paradise for Westerners looking to relocate, I figured I'd again share some of the very real stories of those who did relocate and just how well that worked out for them. 🧵 https://t.co/wG2GPUZNm4

    6.3K1.1K11992771K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20267.2x their median

    Yesterday, a Romanian shepherd stumbled upon a Russian drone carrying an explosive payload that crashed into a field in Romania. This being the first drone he ever saw, the man did the sensible thing and started pulling random wires out of it until he defused it himself. https://t.co/QJucZkJbfs

    5.1K6259477797K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20263.6x their median

    So the good people of Saxony-Anhalt have decided the best response to Russia trying to blow something up in Germany every other day is to vote for an openly pro-Russian party led by a nazi "anti-immigrant" defender of "traditional values", one who is herself a gay immigrant living in Switzerland, married to another immigrant. Alright..

    2.3K5331111937K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 20262.8x their median

    Russians born the day Putin came to power turn 27 this year. More than a quarter of Russia’s population has never known life outside Putin’s direct or proxy rule. Millions have been born, lived and died all under Putin. If anyone needs a new president, that's Russia.

    1.9K40412625K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.1x their median

    Russian air defense units scored another stunning victory this morning, successfully intercepting several Ukrainian drones with two oil depots in Sochi. Absolutely no damage of any kind was registered, according to the Russian MoD. https://t.co/2ZPWQ16yiJ

    1.5K19739438K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 20262.1x their median

    I think we owe it to ourselves at this point to boycott any and all American products we can. Whatever it is they make, there's a better, healthier and cheaper alternative made in Europe, Canada, Japan or Australia. If its Russia they so desperately want, let the Russian buy. https://t.co/qNSDgcwB87

    1.3K342382412K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 20261.9x their median

    Shout out to @Deloitte for the fantastic job they did in helping Russian oligarch Roman Abramovich do tax evasion. Really living up to that "integrity underlies everything we do" "foundational" motto of yours! https://t.co/x5cFPw3zqs

    1.2K340171214K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 20261.9x their median

    To all the spineless sycophants in the Trump administration who’ve blindly defended and enabled his every act of stupidity and corruption, as loudly and as publicly as possible: what’s the plan now boys? If you thought nobody was keeping receipts, you’re in for a surprise. https://t.co/gY7cl5pR9b

    1.2K301321114K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20261.8x their median

    BREAKING: The Dutch Central Bank has announced today that the Netherlands has moved approximately 86 tonnes of gold from the United States and Canada to London, saying the reserves are being repositioned to be better prepared for serious crises. The transfer took place between March and August 2026 and represents more than a quarter of the roughly 313 tonnes of Dutch gold previously stored in the US and Canada. DNB says London was chosen because it is a major trading center for physical gold, meaning the reserves could be sold and accessed more quickly during a crisis. Gold held in New York and Ottawa is considered less immediately available in such circumstances. The move comes amid increasingly strained relations between Europe and the United States since Donald Trump returned to the White House. DNB has previously warned that the Netherlands could be vulnerable if the US restricted payment transactions and has repeatedly called for reducing dependence on the United States.

    1.1K2953941249K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20261.7x their median

    The latest Ipsos poll ordered by Reuters puts his approval rating at 33%. One in three US citizens continues to venerate this complete lunatic. The imbecile annexed the moon last night. https://t.co/qsoT4nUNt9

    1.2K176581415K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 822 interactions against 76K followers, an engagement rate of 1.09%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 6.92% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 15.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 78% carry an image or video and 22% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.6K interactions, about 5.9x its own typical post.

What is Daractenus's engagement rate on X?
Daractenus (@Daractenus) has an engagement rate of 1.09%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 75,514 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.09%, Daractenus sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Daractenus have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Daractenus post?
Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going