Back to @DannyDrinksWine's profile

DepressedBergman engagement report

@DannyDrinksWine - 247K followers on X

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.046%
of 247K followers
Per impression
1.34%
8.5K views on a typical post
Reach
3.44%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
114
interactions (median)
Saved
0.129%
11 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.47/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 114 interactions against 247K followers, an engagement rate of 0.046%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.5K times each, and 1.34% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.45% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 17% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 140x its own typical post.

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

DepressedBergman's engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 51% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.046%, DepressedBergman sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video17% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 17% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 411 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 8, 2026140x their median

    Werner Herzog says contact with David Lynch became “difficult” as he became absorbed by transcendental meditation "He wanted to talk about world peace and meditation, and I’m not into that" https://t.co/Gk01Zulk9W

    14K1.1K1295551.8M viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 202622x their median

    Isabelle Adjani in "One Deadly Summer" (1983) is the epitome of beauty & acting. She carries the movie from the start to the end effortlessly. It is impossible to take your eyes off her. She rejected the role when it was first offered to her. Another actress was cast in her place, but her partner at that time, convinced her to take the role. I believe we are all forever indebted to him. This performance is as good as or slightly better than her performance in "Possession" (1981). I can't see any other actress [I am sorry, Margaret Qualley!] performing either of the roles. Another aspect that enhances Adjani's performance in "One Deadly Summer" (1983) is the costumes. Ever since I saw the movie, I have been meaning to make a video compilation of all the dresses worn by her in the film. Now, I found the time for it. I hope you enjoy the video. I suggest you watch the movie, if you haven't already.

    2.3K200218217K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202611x their median

    Juliette Binoche was the only actor Krzysztof Kieślowski had in mind for the lead character in "Three Colours: Blue" (1993). He had said to Binoche's agent that he wouldn't do the movie if she wasn't part of it. Binoche rejected Steven Spielberg's offer to star in "Jurassic Park" (1993) because she felt the story of 'Blue' was close to her. Binoche had a friend who suffered a similar tragedy as her character in the movie. She had lost her kid and husband. Binoche had helped her recover from the loss. So, in a way, Binoche thought she had already prepared for the role in real life. The one important advice Kieślowski had for her was: “No tears. Never any tears". Initially, Binoche doubted if it would work. But as the filming continued, she understood the reasoning behind Kieślowski's words. P.S: On this day, 33 years ago, "Three Colours: Blue" (1993) premiered at the Telluride Film Festival, USA. I too agree with Kieślowski that no one else could have nailed the role as Binoche did. This is such a subtle performance and a masterclass on how to play a depressed character. I have made this video by compiling some of Binoche's best moments from the movie. I hope you enjoy it.

    1.1K165292855K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20269.8x their median

    Two of the most depressing movie endings from the 21st century. Both movies were released only a year apart each other. Kim Jee-woon & Steve McQueen handle two complex subjects [revenge & lust] in their unique way. But for both the protagonists, the guilt catches up at the end & they cry into the void.

    1.0K90101277K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20266.1x their median

    I wonder what type of movies filmmakers like Ingmar Bergman, Robert Bresson and Andrei Tarkovsky would have made had they been born in this era.

    57938542038K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20263.5x their median

    The symbol of hope and faith in Andrei Tarkovsky's filmography- "Tree of Life." He began and ended his career with similar shots. Below is the side by side of the opening shot of Tarkovsky's first feature film, "Ivan's Childhood" (1962), and the closing shot of his final film, "The Sacrifice" (1986).

    315761615K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20262.7x their median

    In this scene in "See No Evil" (1971), Mia Farrow had to run down a spiral staircase, fall before she reached the bottom and tumble to the floor. Mia Farrow did it so convincingly that after the scene was filmed, Richard Fleischer said, "Good Lord! I hope she hasn't broken her neck". Mia Farrow got up and said, "Do you think that was a good fall? If not, I will do it again" P.S: On this day, 55 years ago, "See No Evil" (1971) was released in the USA.

    263389321K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20262.3x their median

    I finally got around to see "Backrooms" (2026) earlier this week & I was surprised how immersive it was. I was totally drawn into the film's world right from the get go. While it was easy to predict the direction in which the plot was moving, the production design & the acting kept me hooked in. For a 20 year old filmmaker, this is an impressive achievement & a promising debut.

    2331611111K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20261.9x their median

    Today marks 100 years since the release of "Faust" (1926) & it still remains one of the greatest movies ever made. Murnau made many masterpieces in the very short time he lived. It is no wonder that this movie gets overshadowed by his other movies. Murnau was one of Bergman's favourite filmmakers and this movie was among those he loved. I hope people will remember 'Faust' and Murnau's contribution to Cinema, 100 years from now.

    18226718.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 2026

    I miss watching Polish, Hungarian & Czechoslovakian movies. I used to see a lot of movies from those countries regularly. Some of my favourite movies of all time are from that region. For the past 2 years, I haven't seen much. It is time to rectify that mistake.

    13831918.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 114 interactions against 247K followers, an engagement rate of 0.046%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.5K times each, and 1.34% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.45% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 17% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 140x its own typical post.

What is DepressedBergman's engagement rate on X?
DepressedBergman (@DannyDrinksWine) has an engagement rate of 0.046%, based on the median interactions across 29 original posts from the last 30 days against 247,050 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.046%, DepressedBergman sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DannyDrinksWine have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @DannyDrinksWine post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going