Back to @Daniel_Rapaport's profile

Dan Rapaport engagement report

@Daniel_Rapaport - 5.3M followers on X

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.013%
of 5.3M followers
Per impression
0.414%
173K views on a typical post
Reach
3.24%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
715
interactions (median)
Saved
0.005%
9 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.77/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 715 interactions against 5.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 173K times each, and 0.414% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.24% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.0K interactions, about 9.4x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #breaking, #look, #mufc.

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026. Recurring tags: #breaking, #look, #mufc.

Compared with accounts its own size

Dan Rapaport's engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 27% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.013%, Dan Rapaport sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,491 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video27% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link6% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 27% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 198 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 19, 20269.4x their median

    Using the c-word on yourself is crazy and also the reason we love Si Woo https://t.co/9YICu155VP

    6.9K44294360K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20268.9x their median

    🚨👑🏌️#LOOK — Sungjae Im is rocking an electric fit today that says “Sungjae HIM” https://t.co/D7CTpAOgH8

    6.1K1744445614K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20268.6x their median

    24 hours away from probably becoming the youngest to ever play for the club and then this? Sorry but this is ill advised and calculated. There's no argument that the club haven't given the pathway to the first team for him.

    5.8K22412114383K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20267.6x their median

    Ryan Fox WD from the 3M Open. The WD after winning a massive tournament, a tradition unlike any other.

    5.2K5614414813K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20264.8x their median

    If Jon Rahm truly doesn't care about public opinion/narrative...did he play this perfectly? —3 years on LIV —$100+ million in signing on fees —$106 million in earnings —Didn't miss a single major —Didn't miss a Ryder Cup —Will earn his way back on PGA Tour with his play

    3.2K5022713905K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 20264.5x their median

    🚨Charlie Woods playoff hole at 2026 U.S. Junior Championship at Saucon Valley C.C. phone camera clicks in backswing and misses cut 🚨 https://t.co/1T709uo94y

    2.6K77516724.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20264.5x their median

    This is why we will never, ever be able to quit Jordan Spieth. https://t.co/OjXB5B3gEh

    3.0K136774419K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20263.9x their median

    I'm genuinely baffled by this one. Forget Haaland for a moment. Look at Enzo Fernández. He's in an offside position and, in my view, clearly attempts to play the ball and impacts the situation. That's precisely why the offside law matters here. VAR has had the opportunity to examine this from multiple angles and still allowed it. For me, that's a massive VAR error.

    2.1K28032553451K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 20263.7x their median

    Tyler Mawhinney shot 7 under in 17 holes of his U.S. Junior semifinal match. He lost, 2 and 1. Miles Russell carded two eagles and five birdies to advance to Saturday’s 36-hole final against Noah Maclauchlan. https://t.co/VoU1H5IvFn

    2.5K4430181.5M viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 20263.5x their median

    One of the best finishes in recent major memory...a birdie on the brutal 18th to win it outright. Fox played the best all day. Didn't miss a shot down the stretch. Crucial bogey save on the back 9 just like Spieth did. An incredibly compelling watch. https://t.co/NRBbVS1E5b

    2.5K5143288K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#breaking#look#mufc#stick

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 715 interactions against 5.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 173K times each, and 0.414% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.24% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.0K interactions, about 9.4x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #breaking, #look, #mufc.

What is Dan Rapaport's engagement rate on X?
Dan Rapaport (@Daniel_Rapaport) has an engagement rate of 0.013%, based on the median interactions across 33 original posts from the last 30 days against 5,338,260 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.013%, Dan Rapaport sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Daniel_Rapaport have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Daniel_Rapaport post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going