Back to @DanielUrresti1's profile

Daniel Urresti engagement report

@DanielUrresti1 - 561K followers on X

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.009%
of 561K followers
Per impression
1.11%
4.4K views on a typical post
Reach
0.79%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
49
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.9/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 49 interactions against 561K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.4K times each, and 1.11% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.788% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 24x its own typical post.

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026. Recurring tag: #loúltimo.

Compared with accounts its own size

Daniel Urresti's engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 50% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.009%, Daniel Urresti sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video64% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link5% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 64% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 258 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 22, 202624x their median

    ¡¡NO TE SIGAS EQUIVOCANDO SOBRINO!! https://t.co/QgAzocJCxU

    1.0K99036127K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202622x their median

    UN AMIGO DA CONSEJOS SABIOS EN LOS MOMENTOS MÁS DIFÍCILES. LOS INVITO A SEGUIR MI TIK TOK @URRESTICONSEJOS. https://t.co/4A7nVAQ0qz

    9539803761K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202618x their median

    ¡¡LA TIRADERA DE URRESTI!! https://t.co/5rtDcijU07

    72074092118K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20267.6x their median

    Al parecer los grandes medios me han vetado!! https://t.co/hUk93eeYYL

    336270955K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20265.1x their median

    📣 ALTO AL CRIMEN: Keiko Fujimori anuncia Comando Unificado entre las FF.AA. y la PNP | VIDEO ➡️ Entre las medidas que la presidenta anunció están la expulsión de extranjeros delincuentes y recuperar el control de los penales. https://t.co/yZmS4G2HeB

    1864021316K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 20264.7x their median

    #LoÚltimo Tenso momento se vivió durante el debate de facultades en la Comisión de Constitución del Senado. Una fuerte discusión entre el senador de Juntos por el Perú, Iber Maraví, y miembros del gabinete ministerial interrumpió la sesión. https://t.co/9LAmp5WJaT

    10726841132K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20262.8x their median

    Qué paradoja la del JNE: el organismo encargado de dar seguridad jurídica al proceso electoral decidió que lo más prudente era… no decidir. Su falta de un pronunciamiento oportuno antes de las elecciones nos deja ahora ante la posibilidad de un gobierno municipal cuya legitimidad constitucional podría terminar discutiéndose después de que los ciudadanos ya votaron. Excelente manera de proteger la democracia: primero las elecciones y después vemos si todo era constitucional.

    105260512K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20262.6x their median

    Para los conciertos de BTS en Lima: 1,000 agentes municipales, 450 policías por fecha, cámaras, drones, bomberos, ambulancias y 180 buses. Excelente. Ahora solo falta descubrir cómo hacemos para que los delincuentes compren entrada para BTS. Así, por lo menos, los tendremos vigilados.

    110160115K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20262.6x their median

    El Senado puede modificar las facultades aprobadas por Diputados. Al final, todo se decidirá a punta de votos. Lo curioso es que algunos parecen más preocupados por medir fuerzas con el Gobierno que por explicar cómo combatirán al crimen. Los delincuentes deben estar fascinados con nuestro sistema bicameral. ¡Ahora tienen dos cámaras para esperar!

    11211126.5K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20262.1x their median

    La presidenta viajará a El Salvador para conocer el CECOT, la famosa cárcel de Bukele. Interesante. Allá podrá ver cómo mantienen encerrados a los delincuentes. La pregunta es cómo hacemos aquí para atraparlos primero. Porque las cárceles no se llenan con discursos.

    9013016.6K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#loúltimo

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 49 interactions against 561K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.4K times each, and 1.11% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.788% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 24x its own typical post.

What is Daniel Urresti's engagement rate on X?
Daniel Urresti (@DanielUrresti1) has an engagement rate of 0.009%, based on the median interactions across 22 original posts from the last 30 days against 560,818 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.009%, Daniel Urresti sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DanielUrresti1 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @DanielUrresti1 post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going