Back to @DanielMuvdiYT's profile

Daniel Muvdi engagement report

@DanielMuvdiYT - 147K followers on X

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.132%
of 147K followers
Per impression
1.38%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
9.57%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
194
interactions (median)
Saved
0.057%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.83/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 194 interactions against 147K followers, an engagement rate of 0.132%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 1.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.58% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 6% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.1K interactions, about 21x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #quantfury, #trading, #anthropic.

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #quantfury, #trading, #anthropic.

Compared with accounts its own size

Daniel Muvdi's engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 50% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.132%, Daniel Muvdi sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,676 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video56% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 56% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 644 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 24, 202621x their median

    10yr at 5.20% S&P500 and Nasdaq-100 right near ATH’s https://t.co/X895FEmpw2

    3.7K20515730189K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20264.6x their median

    Markets price a 90% probability of a Fed hike, but the data do not justify monetary panic. August CPI was lifted by energy. Rate hikes do not drill a single well, build a pipeline, or lower gasoline prices. What they do is raise mortgage, credit card, and business-financing costs, hurting families, investment, and small firms. The entire burden of higher rates falls on the shoulders of job creators and families, while government spending and energy prices will not be affected. Meanwhile, the labor market has improved, but not enough. 162,000 jobs were created in August, unemployment was steady at 4.1%, and participation was rising. Do not confuse an energy-price shock with demand overheating. Hiking into a recovering job market would be a massive policy mistake. The Fed has other tools to reduce monetary inflation, and balance sheet management is the way, not rate hikes. via Bloomberg

    708140272476K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20261.9x their median

    👀 Atentos al USD/COP. El dólar frente al peso colombiano empieza a mostrar una estructura técnica interesante. Tras formar una base alrededor de los $3.000–$3.100, ahora intenta romper la zona de resistencia de $3.220–$3.240. Si confirma por encima de ese nivel, el USD/COP podría seguir agarrando fuerza para una recuperación más amplia cerca a los $3.500. El peso colombiano empieza a perder momentum, algo bueno para muchos exportadores en el pais.

    3311821228K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20261.8x their median

    Meta acaba de darle un fuerte golpe a las controversiales y, para mí, muy buenas Vision Pro. Meta tiene años haciendo headsets. Compraron Oculus en su momento y sinceramente no creo que Apple esté ni cerca de lo que Meta puede lograr en este mercado. Sí, las Apple Vision Pro son excelentes, pero son bastante pesadas. Meta trae unas gafas de productividad y entretenimiento con apenas unos 100 gramos de peso, lentes micro-OLED y sus pancake patentados. Una verdadera locura. Y si a esto le sumamos que Muse, su IA, se ha convertido en una de mis favoritas: barata, rápida y a niveles casi frontier, que va a controlar todo dentro de sus dispositivos, el avance es significativo. Para mí, Muse se va a convertir en uno de los 3 modelos más importantes en muy poco tiempo. $META

    326156028K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20261.7x their median

    🇺🇸🇨🇳 Trump abre la puerta a que fabricantes chinos como BYD, entre otros, produzcan y vendan vehículos directamente en EE. UU. Cuidado con $TSLA porque este tipo de competencia sí podría golpearlos, los chinos hacen tremendos carros eléctricos.

    2872118021K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20261.6x their median

    La realidad detrás del slowdown que proponen en la IA es que no tienen plata y, si siguen corriendo a este ritmo, se quiebran. Así de siemple. Nos dicen “slowdown”: no tienen que lanzar modelos que consuman cada vez más. Optimizan los que ya tienen, agarran fuerzas, tratan de mejorar los balances y, mientras tanto, siguen entrenando, pero sin la misma presión económica y "problemas de seguridad". No es que la carrera se detenga. Están intentando sobrevivir a ella.

    2622320219K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20261.5x their median

    Nuevo video!! BITCOIN Y WALL STREET AL BORDE DEL COLAPSO: CLARITY ACT, SUBIDA DE TIPOS Y BONO A 10 AÑOS EN 5% Y si quieres verlo en YouTube, acá te dejo el enlace: https://t.co/YGlXUHSFUE #StockMarket #Trading #Quantfury bitcoin:native https://t.co/eyxGI7hlST

    2642014222K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 2026

    Otro fracaso más para Trump: Clarity Act. El tipo no ha logrado nada en 2 años.

    2451328120K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 2026

    ⛽ El verdadero cuello de botella energético ya no está solo en el petróleo. Está en las refinerías. No falta tanto crudo como capacidad para convertirlo en gasolina, diésel y jet fuel. Entre guerras, ataques y daños operativos en Irán, Ucrania y Oriente Medio, unos 7–8 millones de barriles diarios de capacidad de refinación están afectados o fuera de servicio. En EE. UU., las refinerías operan cerca del límite, alrededor del 97%, mientras la Reserva Estratégica de Petróleo sigue cerca de mínimos no vistos desde 1983. Y el punto más delicado es el diésel. El problema es que esta capacidad no se reemplaza de un día para otro. Construir nuevas refinerías lleva años y reparar infraestructura destruida podría extenderse hasta finales de 2027. El cuello de botella ya no está en el pozo. Está en la destilación. El optimismo de la FED queda una vez más en evidencia y mis colegas que no están viendo el verdadero riesgo en el tema del diésel no creo que comprendan la magnitud del problema.

    2291913017K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 2026

    Viedo: Como queda el mercado después de la decisión de tipos, el tema del petróleo tiene solución a corto plazo? El tema de la inflación está resuelto? Mis conclusiones. #Trading #Quantfury https://t.co/AedZuoElqX

    227116114K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#quantfury#trading#anthropic#stockmarket

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 194 interactions against 147K followers, an engagement rate of 0.132%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 1.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.58% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 6% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.1K interactions, about 21x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #quantfury, #trading, #anthropic.

What is Daniel Muvdi's engagement rate on X?
Daniel Muvdi (@DanielMuvdiYT) has an engagement rate of 0.132%, based on the median interactions across 32 original posts from the last 30 days against 146,989 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.132%, Daniel Muvdi sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DanielMuvdiYT have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @DanielMuvdiYT post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going