Back to @DaniNovarama's profile

Dani Sanchez-Crespo engagement report

@DaniNovarama - 131K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.019%
of 131K followers
Per impression
0.365%
6.7K views on a typical post
Reach
5.13%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
24
interactions (median)
Saved
0.067%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.47/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 24 interactions against 131K followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.7K times each, and 0.365% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 88% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.6K interactions, about 192x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #invizimals, #nuestrabase, #tigershark.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #invizimals, #nuestrabase, #tigershark.

Compared with accounts its own size

Dani Sanchez-Crespo's engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 19% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.019%, Dani Sanchez-Crespo sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,475 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video13% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link88% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 13% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 88% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 141 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 12, 2026192x their median

    Setembre de 2013. Estàvem a tota màquina per entregar els primers màsters d’Invizimals, que s’havien d’estrenar arreu del món a principis de desembre. 13 anys després, em fa molta il·lusió que encara hi hagi fans de Tigershark que em demanin dibuixos. #Invizimals #Tigershark https://t.co/WY2R56VhsM

    4.0K4584841134K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 202622x their median

    Qué callados están los terraplanistas eh?

    4642834042K viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 202621x their median

    Estoy muy hasta las narices de políticos peleándose como críos. Callen la puta boca. Arreglen problemas.

    4085827960K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202419x their median

    Había una vez una mujer, programadora de IA. Era estéril, no podía concebir, pero anhelaba ser madre. Así que creó un hijo robot para llenar ese vacío. Quería que fuese un buen chico, así que lo programó con una regla: hacer siempre el bien. Lo llamó Edén. Dentro hilo. https://t.co/4SQcBOyAdi

    3051013011245K viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 202613x their median

    Me encanta la gente que dice que La Odisea de Nolan es la versión “históricamente correcta”. Se lo digo yo o se lo decís vosotros?

    2741129284K viewsView on X
  • Jul 8, 202610x their median

    Acabo de llegar de los USA, he estado hablando con americanos toda la semana pasada. Y hoy voy y veo las declaraciones de Trump en la cumbre de la OTAN. Mi resumen: este tío es gilipollas. Que llegue noviembre ya por favor.

    2181017257K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20268.5x their median

    Me lo han pasado y no me lo creía. Os juro que es real, lo he buscado 1) aprende historia, garrulo. Faltan los Bush, Kennedy, Reagan, Eisenhower… 2) necesita un psiquiatra https://t.co/iUu3ybkntK

    1591627234K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 20267.0x their median

    Vale y ahora vamos a lo importante: infantino, métete la pausa de hidratación y el show lamentable de media parte por donde te quepa. Y a Trump también ya puestos.

    150161010K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 20266.5x their median

    Despidan al entrenador inglés. Tuchel, eres un inútil. Ponerte a defender contra Argentina con un 1-0 a favor. Que GRAN idea Madre mía qué final. QUE FINAL. Alguien conoce un cardiólogo “bueno bueno” que trabaje domingos?

    1341010113K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20265.8x their median

    Hoy toca esto https://t.co/B77KzHPkLY

    107264312K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#invizimals#nuestrabase#tigershark#u20wwc

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 24 interactions against 131K followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.7K times each, and 0.365% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 88% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.6K interactions, about 192x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #invizimals, #nuestrabase, #tigershark.

What is Dani Sanchez-Crespo's engagement rate on X?
Dani Sanchez-Crespo (@DaniNovarama) has an engagement rate of 0.019%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 130,501 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.019%, Dani Sanchez-Crespo sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DaniNovarama have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @DaniNovarama post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going