Back to @DanannOficial's profile

Danann engagement report

@DanannOficial - 477K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.305%
of 477K followers
Per impression
2.55%
57K views on a typical post
Reach
11.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.5K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.058%
33 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.5/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 1.5K interactions against 477K followers, an engagement rate of 0.305%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 85% of 3,917 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 57K times each, and 2.55% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 55K interactions, about 37x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #debatelaotracara, #lindsayclancy.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #debatelaotracara, #lindsayclancy.

Compared with accounts its own size

Danann's engagement rate beats 85% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,917 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 77% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.305%, Danann sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,996 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.439%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99154.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,996 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 96,714 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile154.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%54K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%56K
04:00 UTC-6%45K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%82K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%99K
14:00 UTC-3%102K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%103K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%89K
19:00 UTC-2%84K
20:00 UTC-1%78K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%54K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%239K
Monday0%303K
Tuesday-3%305K
Wednesday-1%259K
Thursday-2%251K
Friday-3%260K
Saturday+3%234K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Dec 12, 202537x their median

    Y sí. https://t.co/VD9xI4khfw

    45K8.8K600152694K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20265.7x their median

    Es literalmente un tipo pegándole a una mina, pero no es violencia de género porque vivimos en el siglo más retardado de la historia y tenemos que hacer de cuenta que ese negro gigante es una minita https://t.co/C3AwPf1rKc

    7.1K1.1K12714199K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.0x their median

    La derecha no tiene artistas.

    2.4K1983125782K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20261.9x their median

    Es hora de prohibir a los hombres hablar sobre el aborto o el cuerpo de la mujer, en general.

    1.4K217927164195K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20261.6x their median

    Soy fan https://t.co/N6TdtBr4cA

    1.7K16340142192K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 2026

    Che qué bien habla inglés EL ALCALDE DE BIRMINGHAM 😂😂😂👳🏾‍♂️💣 https://t.co/BXo9jN4UhR

    1.6K209120964K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 2026

    Quienes creemos en las banderas que enarbolamos preferimos el procesamiento y la condena antes que arrodillarnos ante la agenda que Judas prometió combatir. https://t.co/GyRHwAhk5z

    76312388522K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026

    #DebateLaOtraCara | "Aquí no estamos hablando de la prevención de abuso sexual, nada tiene que ver con eso. Pero lo que hemos encontrado en Colombia: en muchos colegios le dicen a un niño que una niña puede tener pene y un niño puede tener vagina" @silvajonathan01 https://t.co/YQIhvGSsNI

    40115713931K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 2026

    Team masterclass o team mierda humana?

    2218124526K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026

    Trivia: ¿qué tienen en común la Inquisición, el Holocausto y los gulags? 1. El Islam 2. Argentina 3. Los chinos 4. Occidente

    776911350K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#debatelaotracara#lindsayclancy

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.5K interactions against 477K followers, an engagement rate of 0.305%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 85% of 3,917 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 57K times each, and 2.55% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 55K interactions, about 37x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #debatelaotracara, #lindsayclancy.

What is Danann's engagement rate on X?
Danann (@DanannOficial) has an engagement rate of 0.305%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 477,163 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.305%, Danann sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,996 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DanannOficial have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 85% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,917 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @DanannOficial post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going

Danann (@DanannOficial) Engagement Rate - 0.305% | PlayerSells