Back to @DanWetzel's profile

Dan Wetzel engagement report

@DanWetzel - 282K followers on X

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.117%
of 282K followers
Per impression
0.301%
109K views on a typical post
Reach
38.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
330
interactions (median)
Saved
0.011%
12 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.97/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 330 interactions against 282K followers, an engagement rate of 0.117%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 109K times each, and 0.301% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 38.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 47% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 42% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.9K interactions, about 21x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #h2p, #iufb, #lions.

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026. Recurring tags: #h2p, #iufb, #lions.

Compared with accounts its own size

Dan Wetzel's engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 17% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.117%, Dan Wetzel sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,570 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.147%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.699%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,570 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,410 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.699%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video47% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link42% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 47% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 42% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 162 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 22, 202621x their median

    Nothing stops #MACtion https://t.co/aqfAcX179h

    6.5K3922118197K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 202618x their median

    Western Michigan head coach Lance Taylor on the final play of tonight’s game: https://t.co/WJEBAGHaG8

    5.3K3172592031.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202610x their median

    New Jersey taxpayers gave Rutgers $5 million in the state budget for "Events Attraction and Marketing," reportedly to help compete in the NIL arms race. Last night Rutgers lost to UMass 37-21. A team that went 0-12 last year. On a 16-game losing streak. A 28.5-point underdog. Oh! And Rutgers paid UMass $1.55 million to show up and beat them. "We got outlicked, outplayed and outcoached." — Coach Schiano Let's recap: 💸 $5M in taxpayer money 💸 $1.55M paid to the opponent 🏈 One historic upset Your tax dollars at work. https://t.co/0SkFrUPOfA

    2.9K1971031271.5M viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20267.8x their median

    I've seen a lot of people still struggling with understanding what happened at the end of the UM WMU game. With the release of what I consider to be the best angle (shows both the play and the in-stadium clock in HD), I did my best to provide context surrounding the play. https://t.co/OBFk9bIdgY

    1.9K258352851.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20265.7x their median

    96 degrees, dew point 65 at kick off and Pete Golding is rocking a hoodie. Beast mode. https://t.co/gLlTJ1NWjl

    1.8K16289502K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20265.5x their median

    Game of Inches. Field Pass: Game Five 🎥 #H2P https://t.co/k0YZ3sIX1k

    1.4K3013971230K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20265.2x their median

    "I can save you $33 and lots of reading time by summing up the book this way," Kiffin wrote to Mars in a text message, which was shared with ESPN. "Old unnamed sources say Lane used to argue with Saban, drink alcohol and hang out with hot women. New unnamed sources say Lane gets along with Saban, doesn't drink alcohol, but still hangs out with hot women." Great story by @Mark_Schlabach on ESPN about Lane. https://t.co/wxZvXxFEdf

    1.5K913541893K viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 20264.7x their median

    For the first time in program history, your Tarleton State Texans are the No. 1 ranked team in the nation 🔥 https://t.co/WUVXFgqSM6

    1.3K2051334184K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20264.5x their median

    Remember this play last season? It is the only time in the past two seasons that Jeremiah Smith has drawn a pass interference penalty. That's 75 receptions, 1,338 yards, and 12 touchdowns (in 10 games) since he's drawn a PI flag. ⬇️More https://t.co/AW5DeKLzHd

    1.3K127341889K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20263.9x their median

    R.R. Jones Stadium from all angles 📸 📍 El Paso, TX 🏠 El Paso High School 🕰️ Opened in 1916 🪑 12,000 seats • Hosted the first 3 Sun Bowl games (1935-37) • Birthplace of Texas ‘Friday Night Lights’ (1928) Link to watch the game⬇️ https://t.co/9dlbUCIlgY https://t.co/4KYa1JOsWC

    1.2K91149312K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#h2p#iufb#lions#maction#nfl

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 330 interactions against 282K followers, an engagement rate of 0.117%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 109K times each, and 0.301% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 38.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 47% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 42% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.9K interactions, about 21x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #h2p, #iufb, #lions.

What is Dan Wetzel's engagement rate on X?
Dan Wetzel (@DanWetzel) has an engagement rate of 0.117%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 281,684 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.117%, Dan Wetzel sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,570 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DanWetzel have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @DanWetzel post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going